Electrical Engineering

, Volume 99, Issue 3, pp 923–930 | Cite as

Nickel–titanium shape memory alloy-actuated thermal overload relay system design

Original Paper
  • 302 Downloads

Abstract

Nickel–titanium (NiTi) shape memory alloy (SMA) actuated electromechanical applications are becoming widespread in many mechatronics systems. In the thermal overload electromechanical relays (EMRs), the bimetallic strips which provide one-dimensional linear motion are used for activation. In this study, the actuation of the thermal overload EMR system is provided using the NiTi SMAs with novel EMR designs instead of traditional bimetallic strips. Two different nickel–titanium shape memory alloy-actuated thermal overload relays are designed to provide thermal overload protection for varied mechatronics systems. The displacement parameter of the designs is extracted from the established constitutive model for the NiTi SMA-actuated thermal overload relay. The developed antagonistic design structures provide functionality which is convenient for the thermal overload relays. Additionally, the developed NiTi SMA-actuated thermal overload relay designs can function in varied electrical current ranges compared to the traditional bimetallic EMRs which need to be produced separately for different electrical current ranges.

Keywords

NiTi shape memory alloy Thermal overload relay Solid-state relay Electromechanical relay 

References

  1. 1.
    Elahinia M, Shayesteh Moghaddam N, Taheri Andani M, Amerinatanzi A, Bimber B.A, Hamilton R.F (2016) Fabrication of NiTi through additive manufacturing: a review. Progress in Materials ScienceGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Leng J, Yan X, Zhang X, Huang D, Gao Z (2016) Design of a novel flexible shape memory alloy actuator with multilayer tubular structure for easy integration into a confined space. Smart Mater Struct 25:2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schneider D, Lauer M, Voigt I, Drossel WG (2016) Development and examination of switchable heat pipes. Appl Thermal Eng 99:857–865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hartl D, Lagoudas CD (2007) Aerospace applications of shape memory alloys. J Aerosp Eng 221(4):535–552Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dilibal S (2013) Investigation of nucleation and growth of detwinning mechanism in martensitic single crystal NiTi using digital image correlation. Metallogr Microstruct Anal 2:242–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nespoli A, Besseghini S, Pittaccio S, Villa E, Viscuso S (2010) The high potential of shape memory alloys in developing miniature mechanical devices: a review on shape memory alloy mini-actuators. Sensor Actuat A-Phys 158:149–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Browne A, Johnson N, Wittorf M (2012) Energy harvesting, storing, and conversion utilizing shape memory activation, patent US 8.104.278 B2Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sreekumar M, Nagarajan T, Singaperumal M, Zoppi M, Molfino R (2007) Critical review of current trends in shape memory alloy actuators for intelligent robots. Indus Robot 34:285–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hegana A, Hariharan SI, Engeberg E (2016) Electromechanical conversion of low temperature waste heat via helical shape memory alloy actuators. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron 21:1434–1444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pierce M, Mascaro S (2013) A biologically inspired wet shape memory alloy actuated robotic pump. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron 18:536–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mazzolai B, Margheri L, Cianchetti M, Dario P, Laschi C (2012) Soft-robotic arm inspired by the octopus: II. from artificial requirements to innovative technological solutions. Bioinspiration & BiomimeticsGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Engeberg E, Dilibal S, Vatani M, Choi J, Lavery J (2015) Anthropomorphic finger antagonistically actuated by SMA plates. Bioinspiration & BiomimeticsGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dilibal S., Engeberg E.D. (2015) Finger-like manipulator driven by antagonistic NiTi shape memory alloy actuators, IEEE Int. Conference on Advanced Robotics, IstanbulGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Silva A, Santos A, Souto C, Araujo C, Silva S (2013) Artificial biometric finger driven by shape-memory alloy wires. Artif Organs 37:965–972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Andrianesis K, Tzes A (2014) Development and control of a multifunctional prosthetic hand with shape memory alloy actuators. J Intell Robot Syst 78:257–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lu Y, Chung JL (2013) Detecting and solving the coordination curve intersection problem of overcurrent relays in subtransmission systems with a new method. Electric Power Syst Res J 95:19–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Elmitwally A, Gouda E, Eladawy S (2015) Optimal allocation of fault current limiters for sustaining overcurrent relays coordination in a power system with distributed generation. Alex Univ Eng J 54:1077–1089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
  19. 19.
    Mahaffey TR (2002) Electromechanical relays versus solid-state: each has its place. Electronic Design 50:19Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mengshoel OJ, Darwichse A, Cascio K, Chavira M, Poll S, Uckun S (2008) Diagnosing faults in electrical power systems of spacecraft and aircraft, IAAI’08 Proceedings of the 20th national conference on Innovative applications of artificial intelligence, 31699-1705Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Venkataraman B, Godsey B, Premerlani W, Shulman E, Thakur M, Midence R (2005) Fundamentals of a motor thermal model and its applications in motor protection. In: Pulp and Paper Industry Technical ConferenceGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Khosravifard A, Ebrahimi R (2010) Investigation of parameters affecting interface strength in Al/Cu clad bimetal rod extrusion process 31–1:493–499Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kyriakides E, Hadjistassou C, Georgiou J (2012) A new memristor based on NiTi smart alloys, IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, 1403–1406Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Liangliang G, Yong L, Teng YN (2014) An investigation on the crystal structure of Ti\(_{50}\)Ni\(_{50-{\rm x}}\)Cu\(_{\rm {x}}\) shape memory alloys based on density functional theory calculations. Intermatalics 53:20–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bhattacharya K (2003) Microstructure of martensite. Oxford Series on Materials Modeling, OxfordMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mohamed B (2010) Mathematical modeling and control of nonlinear oscillators with shape memory alloys. Dissertation, Wilfrid Laurier UniversityGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Guoa Z, Pana Y, Weeb LB, Yu H (2015) Design and control of a novel compliant differential shape memory alloy actuator. Sens Actuator A-Phys 225:71–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Piccirillo V, Goes LCS, Balthazar JM (2009) A shape memory alloy oscillator: regular and chaotic behavior, using basin of attractions approach. In: Proceedings of COBEM 2009Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Paiva A, Savi MA (2006) An overview of constitutive models for shape memory alloys. Mathematical problems in engineering 1–30Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ashish K, Vidyashankar B (2009) Models for shape memory alloy behavior: an overview of modeling approaches. Int J Struct Changes Solids Mech Appl 1:111–148Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Dilibal
    • 1
  • H. Sahin
    • 1
  • E. Dursun
    • 2
  • E. D. Engeberg
    • 3
  1. 1.Mechatronics Engineering DepartmentIstanbul Gedik UniversityYakacık Kartal, IstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Electrical and Electronics EngineeringMarmara UniversityIstanbulTurkey
  3. 3.Ocean and Mechanical Engineering DepartmentFlorida Atlantic UniversityBoca RatonUSA

Personalised recommendations