Abstract
Developed more than a century ago, Steinmetz’s symbolic method is still puzzling us. It puzzles us because, in spite of its theoretical inconsistencies, it is heuristically efficient. However, it remains the dominant method in design, analysis, and operation of electrical power networks. The paper shows that Steinmetz’s mathematical expression for electrical power is based on assumptions inconsistent with the algebra of complex numbers. The paper argues that, although the numbers are correct, the mathematical interpretation of these numbers is not. Steinmetz got empirical right results for wrong conceptual reasons; the success of the symbolic method is based on the fact that, unwittingly, Steinmetz rediscovered Grassmann–Clifford geometric algebra. The paper challenges the dominant paradigm in power theory which represents voltage, current, active, reactive and apparent power as complex numbers and/or vectors (phasors). The author proposes a new paradigm in which these entities are represented as an algebraic group; the group is composed of a scalar, two vectors and a bivector which are residing in a four-dimensional algebraic space and in a two-dimensional Euclidean geometric space. The paper claims that Steinmetz’s symbolic method is the oldest engineering application of Clifford Algebra. The paper provides a strong motivation for a new didactic of power theory based on Geometric Algebra as Physics’ unifying language.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hong S (1995) Forging scientific electrical engineering. John Ambrose Fleming and the Ferranti effect. Isis 86(1):30–51
Simons P (2009) Vectors and beyond: geometric algebra and its philosophical significance. Dialectica 63(4):381–395
Mathis W (1994) Analysis of power in nonlinear electrical circuits, Technical reports of the Technical University Budapest, Ser. Electr. Eng. J (5) In: Joint to Intern. Symp. Theor. Electrotechnics, No. TUB-TR-94-EE13, Budapest
Wigner E (1960) The unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences. Commun Pure Appl Math XIII(1):1–14
Steinmetz CP (1911) Some unexplored fields in electrical engineering. J Franklin Inst CLXXI(6):537–559 (pg. 540)
Steinmetz Ch (1890) Das Transformatorenproblem in elementar-geometrischer Behandlungsweise. E.T.Z 13:185–186
Steinmetz Ch (1890) Das Transformatorenproblem in elementar-geometrischer Behandlungsweise. E.T.Z. 14:205–206
Steinmetz Ch (1891) Anwendung des Polardiagramms der Wechselströme für inductive Widerstände. E.T.Z. 30:394–396
Steinmetz Ch (1891) Elementary geometrical theory of the alternate-current transformer. Electr Eng XI:627–629
Zeuner G (1884) Treatise of valve-gears, with special considerations of link-motions of locomotive engines. E & F.N. Spon, London
Emde F (1923) Die komplexe Darstellung der Ortskurven in Wechselstromdiagrammen. E.T.Z. 22:532
D’Agostino S, Leva S, Morando AP (2000) Per Una Storia della Teoria delle Reti Elettriche, Atti del XIX Congresso Nazionale di Storia della Fisica a dell’Astronomia, p 235
Hahn SL (1996) Hilbert transforms in signal processing. Artech House, Boston
Gabor D (1946) Theory of communications. Trans Inst Electr Eng 3:429–457
Steinmetz CP (1893) Complex quantities and their use in electrical engineering. In: Proceedings of the International Electrical Congress, Chicago, pp 33–74 (pg. 40)
Macfarlane A (1893) On the analytic treatment of alternating currents. In: Proceedings of the International Electrical Congress, Chicago, pp 24–31
Discussions (1893) Proceedings of the International Electrical Congress, Chicago, pp 74–75
Macfarlane A (1897) Application of hyperbolic analysis to the discharge of a condenser. In: AIEE Trans, vol 14, pp 163–174 (Discussion: pp 175–181, pp 250–252)
Steinmetz CP (1900) Theorie und Berechnungen der Wechselstromerscheinungen, Deutsche von Verfasser Autorisierte Ausgabe, Berlin, Verlag von Reuther & Reichard, 1900, Anhang I
Schubert H (1898) Arithmetic und Algebra, 2. Durchgesehene Aufl., Leipzig, G.L. Göschen
Peacock G (1845) A treatise on algebra, vol II. On the symbolic algebra and its applications to the geometry of position, University Press, Cambridge, MDCCCXL
Steinmetz CP (1899) Symbolic representation of general alternating waves and of double frequency vector products. In: AIEE Trans, vol XVI, pp 269–296 (pg. 270, pg. 272)
Kline RR, Charles P (1983) Steinmetz and the development of electrical engineering science. PhD. Thesis, The University of Wisconsin-Madison, No. 83–23061
Steinmetz CP (1911) Engineering mathematics, a series of lectures delivered at Union College. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York
Feynman RP (1951) An operator calculus having applications in quantum electrodynamics. Phys Rev 84(1):108–128
Guilbert CF (1893) La méthode de M Steinmetz pour le calcul des courants alternatifs. La Lumière Électrique, Tome L, pp 541–458 (pp. 554–563)
Guilbert CF (1896) Courants alternatifs et quantités complexes, L’Éclairage Électrique, pp 216–220
Guilbert CF (1897) Courants oscillants et quantités complexes. L’Éclairage Électrique, Tome X, pp 22–30
Janet P (1897) Sur une application des imaginaires au calcul des courants alternatifs. L’Éclairage Électrique, Tome XIII, pp 529–531
Janet P (1923) Léçons d’Électrotechnique Générale. Tome III, Paris, Gauthier-Villars
Breisig F (1899) Über die Anwendung des Vektordiagramms auf den Verlauf von Wechselströmen in langen Leitungen und über wirtschaftliche Grenzen höher Spannungen. E.T.Z., pp 400–403
Breisig F (1901) Darf man die Theorie rein sinusförmiger Wechselströme in Frage der Kabeltelegraphie anwenden? E.T.Z. 20:415–419
La Cour JL, Bragstad OS (1913) Theory and calculation of electric currents. Longmans, Green and Co., London
Grattan-Guinness I (2000) Routes of learning. Highways, pathways, and byways in the history of mathematics, The John Hopkins University Press, p 23
Mentis A, Zacharias T, Milias-Argitis J (2007) Geometric algebra: a powerful tool for representing power under non-sinusoidal conditions. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst I Regul Papers 54(3):601–609
Castilla MM, Bravo JJC, Ordonez MM, Montano JJC (2008) Clifford theory: a geometrical interpretation of multivectorial apparent power. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst I Fundam Theory Appl 55(10):3358–-3367
Lev-Ari H, Stanković AM (2009) A geometrical algebra approach to decomposition of apparent power in general polyphase networks. In: 41th North American Power Symposium, Calgary
Punga F (1901) Anwendung der Grassmann’schen linearen Ausdehnungslehre auf die analytische und graphische Behandlung von Wechselstromerscheinungen, Zeitschrift für Elektrotechnik, Vienna. Heft 43:516–520
Punga F (1938) Beitrag zur Bestimmung der Wirk-, und Blindleistung beim unsymmetrischen Dreiphasensystem. E.T.Z. 12:309–310
Punga F (1938) Zur Definition der Scheinleistung des unsymmetrischen Dreiphasenstromes und ihre Bestimmung, Archiv für Elektrotechnik 12:822–828
Bolinder FF (1987) Clifford algebra: what is it? IEEE, Antennas and Propagation, Society Newsletter, pp 18–23
Buchanan M (2011) Geometric intuition. Nat Phys 7:442
Hestenes D, Sobczyk G (1984) Clifford algebra to geometric calculus. Reidel, Dordrecht
Lounesto P (2001) Clifford algebras and spinors, \(2^{{\rm nd}}\) edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Altmann SL (1986) Rotations, quaternions, and double groups. Dover Publications, Inc., Mineola
Jancewicz B (1988) Multivectors and Clifford algebra in electrodynamics. World Scientific, Singapore
Dorst L, Doran C, Lasenby J (eds) (2002) Applications of geometric algebra in computer science and engineering. Birkhäuser, Boston
Dorst L, Fontijne D, Mann S (2007) Geometric algebra for computer science. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Zaddach A (1994) Grassmanns algebra in der Geometrie. B.I , Wissenschftsverlag, Mannheim
Arthur JW (2011) Understanding geometric algebra for electromagnetic theory. Wiley, IEEE Press, Hoboken
Dirac PAM (1925) The fundamental equations of quantum mechanics. Proc R Soc Lond A 109:642–653 (pg. 644)
Calvet RG (2007) Treatise of plane geometry through geometric algebra. Cerdanyola del Vallès (pg. 19)
Hitzer E, Nitta T, Kuroe Y (2013) Applications of Clifford’s geometric algebra. Adv Appl Clifford Algebra 23:377–404 (pg. 381)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix: mathematical proof
Appendix: mathematical proof
Calculation of the inner product: active power
The expression \((e^{1}i^{1}~+~e^{11}i^{11})\), obtained through geometric algebra, is identical to Steinmetz’s expression for active power \([P]^{1}\), obtained through symbolic method. The rule \(e_{1}e_{2} = -e_{2}e_{1}\) applies.
Calculation of the outer (wedge) product: reactive power
The expression \(\left( {e^{1}i^{11}-e^{11}i^{1}} \right) \), obtained through Geometric Algebra, is identical to Steinmetz’s expression for reactive power \(\left[ P \right] ^{j}\), obtained through symbolic method. . The rule \(e_{1}e_{2} = -e_{2}e_{1}\) applies.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Petroianu, A.I. A geometric algebra reformulation and interpretation of Steinmetz’s symbolic method and his power expression in alternating current electrical circuits. Electr Eng 97, 175–180 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-014-0325-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-014-0325-y