Skip to main content
Log in

Liquidity and asset prices in rational expectations equilibrium with ambiguous information

  • Symposium
  • Published:
Economic Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The quality of information in financial asset markets is often hard to estimate. Reminiscent of the famous Ellsberg paradox, investors may be unable to form a single probability belief about asset returns conditional on information signals and may act on the basis of ambiguous (or multiple) probability beliefs. This paper analyzes information transmission in asset markets when agents’ information is ambiguous. We consider a market with risk-averse informed investors, risk-neutral competitive arbitrageurs, and noisy supply of the risky asset, first studied by Vives (Rev Financ Stud 8:3–40, 1995a, J Econ Theory 67:178–204, 1995b) with unambiguous information. Ambiguous information gives rise to the possibility of illiquid market where arbitrageurs choose not to trade in a rational expectations equilibrium. When market is illiquid, small informational or supply shocks have relatively large effects on asset prices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Admati A.: A noisy rational expectations equilibrium for multi-asset securities markets. Econometrica 53, 629–657 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cacoullos T.: On upper and lower bounds for the variance of a function of a random variable. Ann Probab 10, 799–809 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell J.Y., Shiller R.J.: Stock prices, earnings, and expected dividends. J Finance 43, 661–676 (1988a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell J.Y., Shiller R.J.: The dividend-price ratio and expectations of future dividends and discount factors. Rev Financ Stud 1, 195–227 (1988b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao H.H., Wang T., Zhang H.H.: Model uncertainty, limited market participation and asset prices. Rev Financ Stud 18, 1219–1251 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caskey J.A.: Information in equity markets with ambiguity-averse investors. Rev Financ Stud 22, 3595–3627 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Condie, S., Ganguli, J.: Ambiguity and rational expectations equilibria. Rev Econ Stud (2010a, forthcoming)

  • Condie, S., Ganguli, J.: Informational efficiency with ambiguous information. Econ Theory (2010b, this issue)

  • Correia da Silva J., Herves-Beloso C.: Prudent expectations equilibrium in economies with uncertain delivery. Econ Theory 39, 67–92 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dana R.A.: Ambiguity, uncertainty aversion and equilibrium welfare. Econ Theory 23, 569–587 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond D., Verrecchia R.: Information aggregation in a noisy rational expectations economy. J Financ Econ 9, 221–235 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dow J., Werlang S.: Ambiguity aversion, risk aversion, and the optimal choice of portfolio. Econometrica 60, 197–204 (1992a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dow J., Werlang S.: Excess volatility of stock prices and Knightian uncertainty. Eur Econ Rev 36, 631–638 (1992b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easley, D., O’Hara, M.: Microstructure and ambiguity. J Finance (2006, forthcoming)

  • Easley D., O’Hara M.: Ambiguity and nonparticipation: the role of regulation. Rev Financ Stud 22, 593–624 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellsberg D.: Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms. Q J Econ 75, 643–669 (1961)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein L., Schneider M.: Ambiguity, information quality and asset pricing. J Finance 63, 197–228 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garlappi L., Uppal R., Wang T.: Portfolio selection with parameter and model uncertainty: a multi-prior approach. Rev Financ Stud 20, 41–81 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilboa I., Schmeidler D.: Maxmin expected utility with non unique prior. J Math Econ 18, 141–153 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman S., Stiglitz J.: On the impossibility of informationally efficient markets. Am Econ Rev 70, 393–408 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellwig M.: On the aggregation of information in competitive markets. J Econ Theory 22, 477–498 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Illeditsch, P.H.: Ambiguous information, portfolio inertia, and excess volatility. Mimeo (2010)

  • Johnson T.C.: Volume, liquidity, and liquidity risk. J Financ Econ 87, 388–417 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ju, N., Miao, J.: Ambiguity, learning, and asset returns. Mimeo (2009)

  • Klibanoff P., Marinacci M., Mukherji S.: A smooth model of decision making under ambiguity. Econometrica 73(6), 1849–1892 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kyle A.: Continuous auctions and insider trading. Econometrica 53, 1315–1337 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeRoy S.F., Parke W.R.: Stock price volatility: tests based on the geometric random walk. Am Econ Rev 82, 981–992 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • LeRoy S.F., Porter R.D.: The present-value relation: tests based on implied variance bounds. Econometrica 49, 555–574 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mankiw N.G., Romer D., Shapiro M.D.: An unbiased reexamination of stock market volatility. J Finance 40, 677–687 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mankiw N.G., Romer D., Shapiro M.D.: Stock market forecastability and volatility: a statistical appraisal. Rev Econ Stud 58, 455–477 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mele, A., Sangiorgi, F.: Uncertainty, information acquisition and price swings in asset markets. Mimeo (2010)

  • Mukerji S., Tallon J.M.: Ambiguity aversion and incompleteness of financial markets. Rev Econ Stud 68, 883–904 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukerji S., Tallon J.M.: Ambiguity aversion and the absence of indexed debt. Econ Theory 24, 665–685 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pástor L., Stambaugh R.: Liquidity risk and expected stock returns. J Polit Econ 111, 642–685 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radner R.: Competitive Equilibrium under uncertainty. Econometrica 36, 31–58 (1968)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radner R.: Rational expectations equilibrium: generic existence and the information revealed by prices. Econometrica 47, 655–678 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer D.: Rational asset-price movements without news. Am Econ Rev 83, 1112–1130 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  • Routledge B., Zin S.: Model uncertainty and liquidity. Rev Econ Dyn 12, 543–566 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmeidler D.: Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity. Econometrica 57, 571–587 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiller R.J.: Do stock prices move too much to be justified by subsequent changes in dividends?. Am Econ Rev 71, 421–436 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  • Strzalecki, T., Werner, J.: Efficient allocations under ambiguity. J Econ Theory (2010, forthcoming)

  • Ui, T.: The ambiguity premium vs. the risk premium under limited market participation. Rev Finance (2010, forthcoming)

  • Vives X.: Short term investment and the information efficiency of the market. Rev Financ Stud 8, 3–40 (1995a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vives X.: The speed of information revelation in a financial market mechanism. J Econ Theory 67, 178–204 (1995b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Werner.

Additional information

We benefited from comments by seminar audiences at Queen’s University, University of Minnesota, Cornell University, HEC Paris, 2007 CARESS-Cowles Conference and 2007 SAET Conference. We are grateful to the editors of this Special Issue for useful suggestions.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ozsoylev, H., Werner, J. Liquidity and asset prices in rational expectations equilibrium with ambiguous information. Econ Theory 48, 469–491 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-011-0648-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-011-0648-0

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation