Abstract
Dubey and Geanakoplos (Q J Econ 117:1529–1570, 2002) have developed a theory of competitive pooling, which incorporates adverse selection and signaling into general equilibrium. By recasting the Rothschild–Stiglitz model of insurance in this framework, they find that a separating equilibrium always exists and is unique.
We prove that their uniqueness result is not a consequence of the framework, but rather of their definition of refined equilibria. When other types of perturbations are used, the model allows for many pooling allocations to be supported as such: in particular, this is the case for pooling allocations that Pareto dominate the separating equilibrium.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dubey P., Geanakoplos J. (2002) Competitive pooling: Rothschild Stiglitz reconsidered. Q J Econ 117, 1529–1570
Gale D. (1992) A Walrasian theory of markets with adverse selection. Rev Econ Stud 59, 229–255
Gale D. (1996) Equilibria and Pareto optima of markets with adverse selection. Econ Theory 7, 207–235
Gale D. (2001) Signaling in markets with two-sided adverse selection. Econ Theory 18, 391–414
Hellwig M. (1987) Some recent developments in the theory of competition in markets with adverse selection. Eur Econ Rev 31, 319–325
Kohlberg E., Mertens J.F. (1986) On the strategic stability of equilibria. Econometrica 54, 1003–1038
Rothschild M., Stiglitz J. (1976) Equilibrium in competitive insurance markets: an essay on the economics of imperfect information. Q J Econ 90, 629–649
Selten R. (1975) Reexamination of the perfectness concept for equilibrium points in extensive Games. Int J Game Theory 4, 25–55
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Martin, A. On Rothschild–Stiglitz as Competitive Pooling. Economic Theory 31, 371–386 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-006-0089-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-006-0089-3