Skip to main content
Log in

Reference equations for ultrasound bone densitometry of the radius in Central European children and adolescents

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Summary

Bone density measurements are important for evaluation and follow-up of children with alterations in their mineral status (increased risk for fractures and osteoporosis subsequently). Interpretation of these measurements relies on the availability of appropriate reference equations. We developed gender-specific, age-dependent reference values of bone density for Central European children.

Introduction

In recent years, there has been an increasing demand for the measurement of bone density in children exposed to an increased risk of early alterations in their bone status. These values must be compared to an adequate reference population. The aim of the present study was to create reference equations of radial speed of sound (SOS) for Central European children and adolescents.

Methods

In this cross-sectional study, SOS values were measured at the distal third of the radius in 581 Swiss children and adolescents (321 girls and 260 boys) aged 6 to 16 years using the Sunlight Omnisense® 7000P quantitative ultrasound system.

Results

Gender-specific reference equations for SOS values were derived by polynomial regression and combined a cubic dependence of age and a linear dependence of height. The fitted SOS curves in our study population show a plateau period in both genders for younger ages followed by an increase phase beginning at the age of 12 in girls and 14 in boys. Neither the reported level of physical activity nor additional sport nor self-reported calcium intake influenced the reference equations.

Conclusions

Our results show a good agreement with similar studies using the same measurement technique on other body parts, suggesting a wide applicability of the obtained reference curves over different European populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

SOS:

Speed of sound

DXA:

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry

QUS:

Quantitative ultrasound

PBM:

Peak bone mass

References

  1. Henry Y, Fatayerji D, Eastell R (2004) Attainment of peak bone mass at the lumbar spine, femoral neck and radius in men and women: relative contributions of bone size and volumetric bone mineral density. Osteoporos Int 15:263–273

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pérez-López F, Chedraui P, Cuadros-López J (2010) Bone mass gain during puberty and adolescence: deconstructing gender characteristics. Curr Med Chem 17:453–466

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pitukcheewanont P, Punyasavatsut N, Feuille M (2010) Physical activity and bone health in children and adolescents. Pediatr Endocrinol Rev 7:275–282

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Prais D, Diamond G, Kattan A, Salzberg J, Inbar D (2008) The effect of calcium intake and physical activity on bone quantitative ultrasound measurements in children: a pilot study. J Bone Miner Metab 26:248–253

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bonjour J (2005) Dietary protein: an essential nutrient for bone health. J Am Coll Nutr 24:526S–536S

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Weldon D (2009) The effects of corticosteroids on bone growth and bone density. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 103:3–11, quiz 11–13, 50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bonjour J, Chevalley T, Rizzoli R, Ferrari S (2007) Gene-environment interactions in the skeletal response to nutrition and exercise during growth. Med Sport Sci 51:64–80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Davies J, Evans B, Gregory J (2005) Bone mass acquisition in healthy children. Arch Dis Child 90:373–378

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Cvijetic S, Colic Baric I, Satalic Z (2010) Influence of heredity and environment on peak bone density: a parent-offspring study. J Clin Densitom 13:301–306

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cashman K, Hill T, Cotter A, Boreham C, Dubitzky W, Murray L, Strain J, Flynn A, Robson P, Wallace J, Kiely M (2008) Low vitamin D status adversely affects bone health parameters in adolescents. Am J Clin Nutr 87:1039–1044

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Baroncelli G, Saggese G (2005) Effect of GH treatment on bone mass in children with GH deficiency. J Endocrinol Invest 28:23–27

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Reix P, Bellon G, Braillon P (2010) Bone mineral and body composition alterations in paediatric cystic fibrosis patients. Pediatr Radiol 40:301–308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Blazina S, Bratanič N, Campa A, Blagus R, Orel R (2010) Bone mineral density and importance of strict gluten-free diet in children and adolescents with celiac disease. Bone 47:598–603

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Baroncelli G (2008) Quantitative ultrasound methods to assess bone mineral status in children: technical characteristics, performance, and clinical application. Pediatr Res 63:220–228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. van den Bergh J, Noordam C, Ozyilmaz A, Hermus A, Smals A, Otten B (2000) Calcaneal ultrasound imaging in healthy children and adolescents: relation of the ultrasound parameters BUA and SOS to age, body weight, height, foot dimensions and pubertal stage. Osteoporos Int 11:967–976

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sawyer A, Moore S, Fielding K, Nix D, Kiratli J, Bachrach L (2001) Calcaneus ultrasound measurements in a convenience sample of healthy youth. J Clin Densitom 4:111–120

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mughal M, Ward K, Qayyum N, Langton C (1997) Assessment of bone status using the contact ultrasound bone analyser. Arch Dis Child 76:535–536

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Wünsche K, Wünsche B, Fähnrich H, Mentzel H, Vogt S, Abendroth K, Kaiser W (2000) Ultrasound bone densitometry of the os calcis in children and adolescents. Calcif Tissue Int 67:349–355

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhu Z, Liu W, Xu C, Han S, Zu S, Zhu G (2007) Ultrasound bone densitometry of the calcaneus in healthy Chinese children and adolescents. Osteoporos Int 18:533–541

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Barkmann R, Rohrschneider W, Vierling M, Tröger J, de Terlizzi F, Cadossi R, Heller M, Glüer C (2002) German pediatric reference data for quantitative transverse transmission ultrasound of finger phalanges. Osteoporos Int 13:55–61

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Baroncelli G, Federico G, Vignolo M, Valerio G, del Puente A, Maghnie M, Baserga M, Farello G, Saggese G, Group PQU (2006) Cross-sectional reference data for phalangeal quantitative ultrasound from early childhood to young-adulthood according to gender, age, skeletal growth, and pubertal development. Bone 39:159–173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Halaba Z, Pluskiewicz W (2004) Quantitative ultrasound in the assessment of skeletal status in children and adolescents. Ultrasound Med Biol 30:239–243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Zadik Z, Price D, Diamond G (2003) Pediatric reference curves for multi-site quantitative ultrasound and its modulators. Osteoporos Int 14:857–862

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lequin M, van Rijn R, Robben S, Hop W, van Kuijk C (2000) Normal values for tibial quantitative ultrasonometry in Caucasian children and adolescents (aged 6 to 19 years). Calcif Tissue Int 67:101–105

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Christoforidis A, Papadopoulou E, Dimitriadou M, Stilpnopoulou D, Gkogka C, Katzos G, Athanassiou-Metaxa M (2009) Reference values for quantitative ultrasonography (QUS) of radius and tibia in healthy Greek pediatric population: clinical correlations. J Clin Densitom 12:360–368

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. (1995) Physical status: the use and interpretation of anthropometry. Report of a WHO Expert Committee. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 854:1–452

  27. Trimpou P, Bosaeus I, Bengtsson B, Landin-Wilhelmsen K (2010) High correlation between quantitative ultrasound and DXA during 7 years of follow-up. Eur J Radiol 73:360–364

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Levine A, Mishna L, Ballin A, Givoni S, Dinari G, Hartman C, Shamir R (2002) Use of quantitative ultrasound to assess osteopenia in children with Crohn disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 35:169–172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hartman C, Brik R, Tamir A, Merrick J, Shamir R (2004) Bone quantitative ultrasound and nutritional status in severely handicapped institutionalized children and adolescents. Clin Nutr 23:89–98

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the children and adolescents who participated in the study as well as their parents.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Moeller.

Additional information

Michael J. Scherrer and Mascha K. Rochat contributed equally to this work.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOCX 261 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Scherrer, M.J., Rochat, M.K., Inci, D. et al. Reference equations for ultrasound bone densitometry of the radius in Central European children and adolescents. Osteoporos Int 25, 2617–2623 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-014-2807-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-014-2807-1

Keywords

Navigation