Abstract
Summary
The aim of this study is to identify osteoporosis values, beyond which there is a high risk of osteosynthesis failure. Bone mineral density (BMD) of 30 cadaveric femora with a pertrochanteric fracture osteotomy was correlated to the risk of cut out after osteosynthesis on a biomechanical testing approach. For a BMD less than 250 mg/cm3, there is a high risk of fixation failure after surgical treatment of pertrochanteric fractures. This value can be regarded as a reference value for future experimental and clinical studies.
Introduction
Despite continuous modification of intramedullary load carriers for the surgical stabilization of trochanteric fractures, cut out remains the most frequent complication. The aim of this experimental study was to identify threshold osteoporosis values, beyond which there is a high risk of osteosynthesis failure.
Methods
Bone mineral density (BMD) of 30 cadaveric femora was recorded for the femoral head by QCT measurement. Subsequently, a standardized osteotomy mimicking an unstable trochanteric type fracture was stabilized by intramedullary nailing. The constructs were loaded axially at a force of 2,100 N up to 20,000 cycles. Cut out at the femoral head was documented by radiograph. Statistical evaluation of the cohort group was performed by calculation of relative risk in relation to the BMD values.
Results
In total, there were six cases of cut out after 10,000 cycles. The incidence of cut out for BMD less than 250 mg/cm3 was 0.55 (5 of 9) and for BMD greater than 250 mg/cm3, it was 0.05 (1 of 21). Therefore, the relative risk of cut out for BMD <250 mg/cm3 is 11× greater than for a BMD >250 mg/cm3. After 20,000 cycles, an additional test caused one cut out (relative risk of cut out for a BMD <250 mg/cm3 5.8).
Conclusions
For a BMD less than 250 mg/cm3, there is a high risk of fixation failure after surgical treatment of pertrochanteric fractures. Although this value is based on an experimental in vitro study design with all its associated limitations, it can be regarded as a reference value for future experimental and clinical studies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bonnaire F, Zenker H, Lill C, Weber AT, Linke B (2005) Treatment strategies for proximal femur fractures in osteoporotic patients. Osteoporos Int 16(2):S93–S102
Parker MJ, Handoll HH (2010) Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (9):CD000093
Bonnaire F, Weber A, Bosl O, Eckhardt C, Schwieger K, Linke B (2007) "Cutting out" in pertrochanteric fractures—problem of osteoporosis? Unfallchirurg 110(5):425–432
Windolf M, Braunstein V, Dutoit C, Schwieger K (2009) Is a helical-shaped implant a superior alternative to the dynamic hip screw for unstable femoral neck fractures? A biomechanical investigation. Clin Biomech 24(1):59–64
Goldhahn J, Seebeck J, Frei R, Frenz B, Antoniadis I, Schneider E (2005) New implant designs for fracture fixation in osteoporotic bone. Osteoporos Int 16(2):S112–S119
Bonnaire FA, Buitrago-Tellez C, Schmal H, Gotze B, Weber AT (2002) Correlation of bone density and geometric parameters to the mechanical strength of the femoral neck. Injury 33(3):C47–C53
von der Linden P, Gisep A, Boner V, Windolf M, Appelt A, Suhm N (2006) Biomechanical evaluation of a new augmentation method for enhanced screw fixation in osteoporotic proximal femoral fractures. J Orthop Res 24(12):2230–2237
Dall'Oca C, Maluta T, Moscolo A, Lavini F, Bartolozzi P (2010) Cement augmentation of intertrochanteric fractures stabilized with intramedullary nailing. Injury 41(11):1150–1155
Konstantinidis L, Papaioannou C, Mehlhorn A, Hirschmuller A, Sudkamp NP, Helwig P (2011) Salvage procedures for trochanteric femoral fractures after internal fixation failure: biomechanical comparison of a plate fixator and the dynamic condylar screw. Proc IME H, J Eng Med 225(7):710–717
Mehlhorn AT, Strohm PC, Muller CA, Konstantinidis L, Schmal H, Sudkamp NP (2009) The reversed locked internal plate fixator as an alternative internal fixation of problematic proximal femur fractures. Z Orthop Unfall 147(5):561–566
Muller ME (1980) Classification and international AO-documentation of femur fractures. Unfallheilkunde 83(5):251–259
Wu CC, Shih CH, Lee MY, Tai CL (1996) Biomechanical analysis of location of lag screw of a dynamic hip screw in treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fracture. J Trauma 41(4):699–702
Konstantinidis L, Hauschild O, Beckmann NA, Hirschmuller A, Sudkamp NP, Helwig P (2010) Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures with two different minimal invasive angle-stable plates: biomechanical comparison studies on cadaveric bones. Injury 41(12):1256–1261
Bergmann G, Deuretzbacher G, Heller M, Graichen F, Rohlmann A, Strauss J, Duda GN (2001) Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. J Biomech 34(7):859–871
Roderer G, Moll S, Gebhard F, Claes L, Krischak G (2011) Side plate fixation vs. intramedullary nailing in an unstable medial femoral neck fracture model: a comparative biomechanical study. Clin Biomech 26(2):141–146
Sermon A, Boner V, Boger A, Schwieger K, Boonen S, Broos PL, Richards RG, Windolf M (2011) Potential of Polymethylmethacrylate Cement-Augmented Helical Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation Blades to Improve Implant Stability-A Biomechanical Investigation in Human Cadaveric Femoral Heads. The Journal of trauma
Barton TM, Gleeson R, Topliss C, Greenwood R, Harries WJ, Chesser TJ (2010) A comparison of the long gamma nail with the sliding hip screw for the treatment of AO/OTA 31-A2 fractures of the proximal part of the femur: a prospective randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92(4):792–798
Sadowski C, Lubbeke A, Saudan M, Riand N, Stern R, Hoffmeyer P (2002) Treatment of reverse oblique and transverse intertrochanteric fractures with use of an intramedullary nail or a 95° screw-plate: a prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A(3):372–381
Lobo-Escolar A, Joven E, Iglesias D, Herrera A (2010) Predictive factors for cutting-out in femoral intramedullary nailing. Injury 41(12):1312–1316
Akan K, Cift H, Ozkan K, Eceviz E, Tasyikan L, Eren A (2011) Effect of osteoporosis on clinical outcomes in intertrochanteric hip fractures treated with a proximal femoral nail. J Int Med Res 39(3):857–865
Knobe M, Munker R, Schmidt-Rohlfing B, Sellei RM, Schubert H, Erli HJ (2008) Surgical outcome in pertrochanteric femur fracture: the impact of osteoporosis. Comparison between DHS and percutaneous compression plate. Z Orthop Unfall 146(1):44–51
Hauschild O, Ghanem N, Oberst M, Baumann T, Kreuz PC, Langer M, Suedkamp NP, Niemeyer P (2009) Evaluation of Singh index for assessment of osteoporosis using digital radiography. Eur J Radiol 71(1):152–158
Konstantinidis L, Papaioannou C, Hirschmüller A, Pavlidis T, Schröter S, Südkamp NP, Helwig P (2012) Effects of muscle-equivalent forces on the biomechanical behavior of proximal femur fracture models: a pilot study on artificial bones. Proceedings of the institution of mechanical engineers part H. J Eng Med 226(9):681–685
Sommers MB, Roth C, Hall H, Kam BC, Ehmke LW, Krieg JC, Madey SM, Bottlang M (2004) A laboratory model to evaluate cut out resistance of implants for pertrochanteric fracture fixation. J Orthop Trauma 18(6):361–368
Conflicts of interest
None
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Konstantinidis, L., Papaioannou, C., Blanke, P. et al. Failure after osteosynthesis of trochanteric fractures. Where is the limit of osteoporosis?. Osteoporos Int 24, 2701–2706 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-013-2392-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-013-2392-8