Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Reduction in normalized bone elasticity following long-term bisphosphonate treatment as measured by ultrasound critical angle reflectometry

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using an improved version of ultrasound critical angle reflectometry, the bone quality of cortical and trabecular bone was assessed in vivo by measuring elastic moduli (normalized for bone density) at both principal axes, referred to as the minimum and maximum normalized elasticities. The measurements were made in 30 normal premenopausal women, 30 normal postmenopausal women, 22 untreated postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, 74 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis or osteopenia on bisphosphonate treatment, and 32 patients with renal transplantation (16 women and 16 men) taking steroids. Cortical elasticity was higher than trabecular elasticity; both declined slightly and non-significantly with age in normal women. Among untreated postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, cortical maximum normalized elasticity (Ecmax) remained within 95% prediction intervals of normal women. Among patients on bisphosphonate, Ecmax was low in the majority of patients. Ecmax was significantly more depressed among those taking the drug ≥3 years than <3 years (22.1% below normal premenopausal women versus 17.2%, P =0.001), and among those with incident non-spinal fractures than without (75.9 vs. 81.5%, P =0.008). Ecmax was independent of bone mineral density at the calcaneus. Most patients with renal transplantation had low Ecmax, with a mean 20.8% below the normal premenopausal mean. Qualitatively similar findings were found with cortical minimum elasticity and with trabecular minimum and maximum elasticities. Thus, the material bone quality of cortical and trabecular bone may be impaired following bisphosphonate treatment, as in renal transplantation on steroids.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. NIH Consensus Conference (2001) Osteoporosis, diagnosis and therapy. J Amer Med Assoc 285:785–795

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sartoris DJ, Moscona A, Resnick D (1990) Dual energy radiographic absorptiometry for bone densitometry: current status and perspective. Progress in radiology. Ann NY Acad Sci 592:307–325

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mehta SS, Oz O, Antich P (1998) Bone elasticity and ultrasound velocity are affected by subtle changes in the organic matrix. J Bone Miner Res 13:114–121

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mashiba T, Turner CH, Hirano T, Forwood MR, Johnston CC, Burr DB (2001) Effects of suppressed bone turnover by bisphosphonates on microdamage accumulation and biomechanical properties in clinically relevant skeletal sites in beagles. Bone 28:524–531

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. An YH, Draughn RA (1999) Mechanical testing of bone and the bone-implant interface, 1st edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL

  6. Ashman RB, Corin JD, Turner CH (1987) Elastic properties of cancellous bone: measurement by an ultrasonic technique. J Biomech 20:979–986

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gluer CC, Vahlensieck M, Faulkner KG, Engelke K, Black D, Genant HK (1992) Site-matched calcaneal measurement of broad-band ultrasound attenuation and single X-ray absorptiometry: do they measure different skeletal properties? J Bone Miner Res 7:1071–1079

    Google Scholar 

  8. Antich PP, Anderson RB, Ashman RB, Dowdey JE, Gonzales J, Murry RC et al. (1991) Measurement of mechanical properties of bone material in vitro by ultrasound reflection: methodology and comparison with transmission ultrasound. J Bone Min Res 6:417–426

    Google Scholar 

  9. Antich PP, Pak CYC, Gonzales J, Anderson J, Sakhaee K, Rubin C (1993) Measurement of intrinsic bone quality in vivo by reflection ultrasound: correction of impaired quality with slow-release sodium fluoride and calcium citrate. J Bone Miner Res 8:301–311

    Google Scholar 

  10. Richer E, Lewis M, Odvina C, Vazquez M, Antich PP, Pak CYC (2003) Impaired bone quality in bisphosphonate (BISPHOS) treatment and renal transplantation by ultrasound critical angle reflectometry (UCR). J Bone Min Res 18(S2):SU111

    Google Scholar 

  11. Antich P, Mehta S (2001) Properties and measurements of hard tissues, part 2: ultrasound critical-angle reflectometry. In: Levy M, Bass H, Stern R (eds) Handbook of elastic properties of solids, liquids and gases, vol. III. Academic Press, New York, pp 182–192

  12. Odvina C, Zerwekh JE, Rao DS, Maalouf N, Gottschalk FA, Pak CYC (2004) Severely suppressed bone turnover: a potential complication of alendronate therapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (accepted for publication)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rojas E, Carlini RG, Clesca P, Arminio A, Suniaga O, DeElguezabal K, Weisinger JR, Hruska KA, Bellorin-Font E (2003) Pathogenesis of renal osteodystrophy after renal transplantation as detected by early alteration in bone remodeling. Kidn Inter 63:1915–1923

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mehta SS, Antich PP, Daphtary MM, Bronson DG, Richer E (2001) Bone material ultrasound velocity is predictive of whole bone strength. Ultrasound Med Biol 27:861–867

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ashman RB, Antich PP, Anderson JA, Gonzales J, Rho JY (1994) A comparison of reflection and transmission ultrasonic techniques for measurement of cancellous bone elasticity. J Biomech 27:1195–1199

    Google Scholar 

  16. Antich P, Mehta S (1997) Ultrasound critical-angle reflectometry (UCR): a new modality for functional elastometric imaging. Phys Med Biol 42:1763–77

    Google Scholar 

  17. Whyte MP, Wenkert D, Clemens KL, McAllister WH, Mumm S (2003) Bisphosphonate-induced osteopetrosis. N Eng J Med 349:457–463

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ruggiero SL, Mebrotra B, Rosenberg TJ, Engroff SL (2004) Osteonecrosis of the jaws associated with the use of bisphosphonates: a review of 63 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 62:527–534

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Norman TL, Yeni YN, Brown CU, Wang Z (1998) Influence of microdamage on fracture toughness of the human femur and tibia. Bone 23:303–306

    Google Scholar 

  20. Day JS, Ding M, Bednarz P, van der Linden JC, Mashiba T, Hirano T, et al (2004) Bisphosphonate treatment affects trabecular bone apparent modulus through micro-architecture rather than matrix properties. J Orthop Res 22:465–471

    Google Scholar 

  21. Liberman UA, Weiss SR, Broll J, Minne H, Quan H, Bell NH, et al. (1995) Effect of oral alendronate on bone mineral density and the incidence of fractures in postmenopausal osteoporosis. N Eng J Med 333:1437–1443

    Google Scholar 

  22. Harris ST, Watts NB, Genant HK, McKeever CD, Hangartner T, Keller M et al (1999) Effects of risedronate treatment on vertebral and nonvertebral fractures in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. A randomized controlled trial. J Amer Med Assoc 282:1344–1352

    Google Scholar 

  23. Boivin GY, Chavassiux PM, Santora AC, Yates J, Meunier PJ (2000) Alendronate increases bone strength by increasing the mean degree of mineralization of bone tissue in osteporotic women. Bone 27:687–694

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mehta, SS (1995) Analysis of the mechanical properties of bone material using nondestructive ultrasound reflectometry. PhD dissertation, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas

  25. Heaf J (2001) Causes and consequences of adynamic bone disease. Nephron 88:97–106

    Google Scholar 

  26. Vantour LM, Melton LJ, III, Clarke BL, Achenbach SJ, Oberg AL, McCarthy JT (2004) Long-term risk of fracture following renal transplantation: a population based study. Osteoporos Int 15:160–167

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by a GCRC grant from NIH M01-RR00633, and by the discretionary funds of the Center for Mineral Metabolism and Clinical Research and the Bone Quality Research Institute. The new UCR device is being developed by a non-profit entity, the Bone Quality Research Institute, in cooperation with the sponsor, the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center. None of the authors own equity in the Bone Quality Research Institute.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edmond Richer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Richer, E., Lewis, M.A., Odvina, C.V. et al. Reduction in normalized bone elasticity following long-term bisphosphonate treatment as measured by ultrasound critical angle reflectometry. Osteoporos Int 16, 1384–1392 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-005-1848-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-005-1848-x

Keywords

Navigation