Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Assessment of prevalent and incident vertebral fractures in osteoporosis research

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Vertebral fractures are the hallmark of osteoporosis, and it has been shown that the presence of vertebral fractures adds to the risk of future osteoporotic fractures. Thus, the evaluation of spinal radiographs for prevalent or incident vertebral fractures is important in the clinical evaluation of patients with osteoporosis, in clinical drug trials for osteoporosis treatment and in the epidemiologic evaluation of populations at risk for osteoporosis. Traditionally, conventional lateral radiographs of the thoracolumbar spine have been analyzed visually by radiologists or experienced clinicians to identify vertebral fractures in patients with clinical indications. Epidemiologic studies or clinical drug trials in osteoporosis research have considerably different requirements and expectations. To reduce potential subjectivity in qualitative readings and to provide definable, reproducible and objective methods to detect vertebral fracture, and to accommodate the assessment of large numbers of radiographs, various morphometric approaches have been explored and employed. However, potential deficiencies in morphometry have led to a renewed interest in standardized qualitative visual approaches for defining vertebral fractures and visual criteria. Numerous studies have shown that semiquantitative interpretation, after careful centralized training and standardization, can produce results with excellent intra- and interobserver reproducibility. We firmly believe that the experience from several studies has shown that there is a major role for radiologists and clinicians alike to carefully assess and diagnose vertebral fractures using standardized grading schemes such as the one proposed in this review. In the context of epidemiologic studies and clinical drug trials, quantitative morphometry may be used; however, the studies would be flawed if quantitative morphometry were to be performed in isolation without additional adjudication by a trained and highly experienced radiologist or clinician.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kleerekoper M, Nelson DA. Vertebral fracture or vertebral deformity. Calcif Tissue Int 1992;50:5–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Melton III LJ, Kan SH, Frye MA, Wahner HW, O'Fallon WM, Riggs BL. Epidemiology of vertebral fractures in women. Am J Epidemiol 1989;129:1000–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Genant HK, Wu CY, van Kuijk C, Nevitt MC. Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique. J Bone Miner Res 1993;8:1137–48.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Riggs BL, Hodgson SF, O'Fallon WM, Chao EY, Wahner HW, Muhs JM, et al. Effect of fluoride treatment on the fracture rate in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 1990;322:802–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Storm T, Thamsborg G, Steiniche T, Genant HK, Sørenson OH. Effect of intermittent cyclical etidronate therapy on bone mass and fracture rate in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 1990;322:1265–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Adami S, Gatti D, Rossini M, Adamoli A, James G, Girardello S, et al. The radiological assessment of vertebral osteoporosis. Bone 1992;13(Suppl 2):S33–6.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kanis JA, McCloskey EV, Khan S, Nakatsuka K, Sirtori P. What is a vertebral fracture? In: Christensen C, Riis B, editors. Fourth international symposium on osteoporosis and consensus development conference. Hong Kong: ApS Osteopress, 1993.

  8. Kiel D. Assessing vertebral fractures. National Osteoporosis Foundation Working Group on Vertebral Fractures. J Bone Miner Res 1995;10:518–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fletcher H. Anterior vertebral wedging: frequency and significance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1947;57:232–8.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Barnett E, Nordin BEC. The radiological diagnosis of osteoporosis: a new approach. Clin Radiol 1960;2:166–74.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hurxthal LM. Measurement of anterior vertebral compressions and biconcave vertebrae. AJR Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 1968;103:635–44.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jensen KK, Tougaard L. A simple X-ray method for monitoring progress of osteoporosis. Lancet 1981;II:19–20.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kleerekoper M, Parfitt AM, Ellis BI. Measurement of vertebral fracture rates in osteoporosis. In: Christiansen C, Arnaud CD, Nordin BEC, Parfitt AM, Peck WA, Riggs BL, editors. Copenhagen International Symposium on Osteoporosis June 3–8, 1984, vol 1. Copenhagen: Department of Clinical Chemistry, Glostrup Hospital, 1984:103–8.

  14. Hedlund LR, Gallagher JC. Vertebral morphometry in diagnosis of spinal fractures. Bone Miner 1988;5:59–67.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Davies KM, Recker RR, Heaney RP. Revisable criteria for vertebral deformity. Osteoporos Int 1993;3:265–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Smith-Bindman R, Cummings SR, Steiger P, Genant HK. A comparison of morphometric definitions of vertebral fracture. J Bone Miner Res 1991;6:25–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Eastell R, Cedel SL, Wahner HW, Riggs BL, Melton III LJ. Classification of vertebral fractures. J Bone Miner Res 1991;6:207–15.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Minne HW, Leidig G, Wuster C, Siromachkostov L, Baldauf G, Bickel R, et al. A newly developed spine deformity index (SDI) to quantitate vertebral crush fractures in patients with osteoporosis. Bone Miner 1988;3:335–49.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Black DM, Cummings SR, Stone K, Hudes E, Palermo L, Steiger P. A new approach to defining normal vertebral dimensions. J Bone Miner Res 1991;6:883–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. McCloskey EV, Spector TD, Eyres KS, Fern ED, O'Rourke N, Vasikaran S, et al. The assessment of vertebral deformity: a method for use in population studies and clinical trials. Osteoporos Int 1993;3:138–47.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ross PD, Yhee YK, He YF, Davis JW, Kamimoto C, Epstein RS, et al. A new method for vertebral fracture diagnosis. J Bone Miner Res 1993;8:167–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Genant HK, Van Kuijk C, Jergas M. Vertebral fracture in osteoporosis. San Francisco: Radiology Research and Education Foundation, 1995.

  23. Sauer P, Leidig G, Minne HW, Duckeck G, Schwarz W, Siromachkostov L, et al. Spine deformity index (SDI) versus other objective procedures of vertebral fracture identification in patients with osteoporosis: a comparative study. J Bone Miner Res 1991;6:227–38.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hansen MA, Overgaard K, Nielsen VA, Jensen GF, Gotfredsen A, Christiansen C. No secular increase in the prevalence of vertebral fractures due to postmenopausal osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 1992;2:241–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wu CY, Li J, Jergas M, Genant HK. Comparison of semiquantitative and quantitative techniques for the assessment of prevalent and incident vertebral fractures. Osteoporos Int 1995;5:354–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Grados F, Roux C, de Vernejoul MC, Utard G, Sebert JL, Fardellone P. Comparison of four morphometric definitions and a semiquantitative consensus reading for assessing prevalent vertebral fractures. Osteoporos Int 2001;12:716–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Davies KM, Recker RR, Heaney RP. Normal vertebral dimensions and normal variation in serial measurements of vertebrae. J Bone Miner Res 1989;4:341–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. De Smet AA, Robinson RG, Johnson BE, Lukert BP. Spinal compression fractures in osteoporotic women: patterns and relationship to hyperkyphosis. Radiology 1988;166:497–500.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Clark KC. Positioning in radiography. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1986.

  30. Gallagher JC, Hedlund LR, Stoner S, Meeger C. Vertebral morphometry: normative data. Bone Miner 1988;4:189–96.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Nicholson PH, Haddaway MJ, Davie MW, Evans SF. A computerized technique for vertebral morphometry. Physiol Meas 1993;14:195–204.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Smith-Bindman R, Steiger P, Cummings SR, Genant HK. The index of radiographic area (IRA): a new approach to estimating the severity of vertebral deformity. Bone Miner 1991;15:137–49.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Steiger P, Cummings SR, Genant HK, Weiss H. Morphometric X-ray absorptiometry of the spine: correlation in vivo with morphometric radiography. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Osteoporos Int 1994;4:238–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Spector TD, McCloskey EV, Doyle DV, Kanis JA. Prevalence of vertebral fracture in women and the relationship with bone density and symptoms: the Chingford Study. J Bone Miner Res 1993;8:817–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Albright F, Smith PH, Richardson AM. Postmenopausal osteoporosis. Its clinical features. JAMA 1941;116:2465–74.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Nathanson L, Lewitan A. Deformities and fractures of the vertebrae as a result of senile and presenile osteoporosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1941;46:197–202.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Barnett E, Nordin BEC. Radiological assessment of bone density. I. The clinical and radiological problem of thin bones. Br J Radiol 1961;34:683–92.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Doyle FH, Gutteridge DH, Joplin GF, Fraser R. An assessment of radiological criteria used in the study of spinal osteoporosis. Br J Radiol 1967;40:241–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Smith RW, Eyler WR, Mellinger RC. On the incidence of senile osteoporosis. Ann Intern Med 1960;52:773–81.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Meunier P. La dynamique du remaniement osseux humain, étudiée par lecture quantitative de la biopsie osseuse. Lyon, 1968.

  41. Meunier PJ, Bressot C, Vignon E, Edouard C, Alexandre C, Courpron P, et al. Radiological and histological evolution of post-menopausal osteoporosis treated with sodium fluoride–vitamin D–calcium. Preliminary results. In: Courvoisier B, Donath A, Baud CA, editors. Fluoride and bone. Bern: Hans Huber, 1978:263–76.

  42. Jergas M, Lang TF, Fuerst T. Morphometric X-ray absorptiometry. In: Genant HK, Jergas M, van Kuijk C, editors. Vertebral fracture in osteoporosis. San Francisco: Radiology Research and Education Foundation, 1995:331–48.

  43. Hans D, Baiada A, Dubouef F, Vignot E, Bochu M, Meunier P. Expert-XL: clinical evaluation of a new morphometric technique on 21 patients with vertebral fracture. Osteoporos Int 1996;6:79.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Watts NB, Harris ST, Genant HK, Wasnich RD, Miller PD, Jackson RD, et al. Intermittent cyclical etidronate treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 1990:323:73–9.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Ettinger B, Block JE, Smith R, Cummings SR, Harris ST, Genant HK. An examination of the association between vertebral deformities, physical disabilities and psychosocial problems. Maturitas 1988;10:283–96.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Heuck AF, Block J, Gluer CC, Steiger P, Genant HK. Mild versus definite osteoporosis: comparison of bone densitometry techniques using different statistical models. J Bone Miner Res 1989;4:891–900.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Li J, Wu CY, Jergas M, Genant HK. Diagnosing prevalent vertebral fractures: a comparison between quantitative morphometry and a standardized visual (semiquantitative) approach. In: Genant HK, Jergas M, van Kuijk C, editors. Vertebral fracture in osteoporosis. San Francisco: Radiology Research and Education Foundation, 1995:271–80.

  48. Wu CY, Li J, Jergas M, Genant HK. Diagnosing incident vertebral fractures: a comparison between quantitative morphometry and a standardized visual (semiquantitative) approach. In: Genant HK, Jergas M, van Kuijk C, editors. Vertebral fracture in osteoporosis. San Francisco: Radiology Research and Education Foundation, 1995:281–92.

  49. Ross PD, Davis JW, Epstein RS, Wasnich RD. Ability of vertebral dimensions from a single radiograph to identify fractures. Calcif Tissue Int 1992;51:95–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Harrison JE, Patt N, Muller C, Bayley TA, Budden FH, Josse RG, et al. Bone mineral mass associated with postmenopausal vertebral deformities. Bone Miner 1990;10:243–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Black D, Palermo L, Nevitt MC, Genant HK, Epstein R, San Valentin R, Cummings SR, and the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Comparison of methods for defining prevalent vertebral deformities: the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures. J Bone Miner Res 1995;10:890–902.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Jensen GF, McNair P, Boesen J, Hegedus V. Validity in diagnosing osteoporosis. Observer variation in interpreting spinal radiographs. Eur J Radiol 1984;4:1–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Ross PD, Wasnich RD, Davis JW, Vogel JM. Vertebral dimension differences between Caucasian populations, and between Caucasians and Japanese. Bone 1991;12:107–12.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. McCloskey EV, Spector TD, Khan S, Sirtori P, Nagatsuka K, Kanis JA. Prevalence of vertebral deformity and concordance between definitions of fracture. In: Christiansen C, Riis B, editors. Fourth international symposium on osteoporosis and consensus development conference. Hong Kong: ApS Osteopress, 1993:62–4.

  55. van Kuijk C, Genant HK. Radiology in osteoporosis. In: Riggs BL, Melton LJ, editors. Osteoporosis. New York: Raven Press, 1995.

  56. Leidig-Bruckner G, Genant HK, Minne HW, Storm T, Thamsborg G, Bruckner T, et al. Comparison of a semiquantitative and a quantitative method for assessing vertebral fractures in osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 1994;4:154–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Fechtenbaum J, Giraudeau B, Ravaud P, Kolta S, Roux C. Defining incident vertebral deformities: another approach [abstract]. 23rd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, Phoenix, AZ, 2001.

  58. Genant HK, Jergas M, Palermo L, Nevitt M, Valentin RS, Black D, et al. Comparison of semiquantitative visual and quantitative morphometric assessment of prevalent and incident vertebral fractures in osteoporosis. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. J Bone Miner Res 1996:11:984–96.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Black DM, Cummings SR, Karpf DB, Cauley JA, Thompson DE, Nevitt MC, et al. Randomised trial of effect of alendronate on risk of fracture in women with existing vertebral fractures. Fracture Intervention Trial Research Group. Lancet 1996;348:1535–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Chesnut CH 3rd, Silverman S, Andriano K, Genant H, Gimona A, Harris S, et al. A randomized trial of nasal spray salmon calcitonin in postmenopausal women with established osteoporosis: the Prevent Recurrence Of Osteoporotic Fractures (PROOF) Study Group. Am J Med 2000;109:267–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Ettinger B, Black DM, Mitlak BH, Knickerbocker RK, Nickelsen T, Genant HK, et al. Reduction of vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis treated with raloxifene: results from a 3-year randomized clinical trial. Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE) Investigators. JAMA 1999;282:637–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Harris ST, Watts NB, Genant HK, McKeever CD, Hangartner T, Keller M, et al. Effects of risedronate treatment on vertebral and nonvertebral fractures in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: a randomized controlled trial. Vertebral Efficacy with Risedronate Therapy (VERT) Study Group. JAMA 1999;282:1344–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Neer RM, Arnaud CD, Zanchetta JR, Prince R, Gaich GA, Reginster JY, et al. Effect of parathyroid hormone (1–34) on fractures and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 2001;344:1434–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Reginster J, Minne HW, Sorensen OH, Hooper M, Roux C, Brandi ML, et al. Randomized trial of the effects of risedronate on vertebral fractures in women with established postmenopausal osteoporosis. Vertebral Efficacy with Risedronate Therapy (VERT) Study Group. Osteoporos Int 2000;11:83–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Hedlund LR, Gallagher JC, Meeger C, Stoner S. Change in vertebral shape in spinal osteoporosis. Calcif Tissue Int 1989;44:168–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Raymakers JA, Kapelle JW, van Beresteijn EC, Duursma SA. Assessment of osteoporotic spine deformity. A new method. Skeletal Radiol 1990;19:91–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, Medicine and Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143-0628, USA

    H. K. Genant

  2. Department of Radiology, Elisabeth-Krankenhaus, Cologne, Germany

    M. Jergas

Authors
  1. H. K. Genant
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Jergas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. K. Genant.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Genant, H.K., Jergas, M. Assessment of prevalent and incident vertebral fractures in osteoporosis research. Osteoporos Int 14 (Suppl 3), 43–55 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-002-1348-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-002-1348-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation