Skip to main content
Log in

Free-field blast parameter errors from Cartesian cell representations of bursting sphere-type charges

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Shock Waves Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The bursting sphere model is a simple approach to the numerical simulation of blast from charge detonation. It involves initializing a group of computational cells at high pressure with the correct blast energy to represent the charge volume. In this paper, a programme of numerical simulations of charge detonations in free-field air using the bursting sphere approach will be performed. This is done to investigate the errors in important blast parameters like peak overpressure and impulse that arise due to deviation of the charge shape from an ideal spherical profile when the charge is represented by a Cartesian mesh. This study will also include an assessment of the quality of error estimation for this problem based on grid refinement studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Autodyn user’s manual-version 4.2. Century Dynamics Inc. (1997)

  2. Barth, T.J., Jespersen, D.: The design and application of upwind schemes on unstructured meshes. In: 27th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting (1989). AIAA 89-0366

  3. Baum, J.D., Löhner, R.: Numerical simulation of shock-elevated box interaction using an adaptive finite element shock capturing scheme. AIAA J. 32(4), 682–692 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bevins, T.L., Armstrong, B.J., Baylot, J.T., Rickman, D.D.: Multiple building simulations and effect of berms behind blast barrier walls. In: User’s Group Conference (2003)

  5. Brode, H.L.: Numerical solutions of spherical blast waves. J. Appl. Phys. 26, 766–775 (1955)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Cieslak, S., Kheil, S.B., Choquet, I., Merlen, A.: Cut cell strategy for 3-D blast waves numerical simulations. Shock Waves 10, 421–429 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Clutter, J.K., Mathis, J.T., Stahl, M.W.: Modeling environmental effects in the simulation of explosion events. Int. J. Impact Eng. 34, 973–989 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. De Zeeuw, D.L.: A quadtree-based adaptively-refined cartesian-grid algorithm for solution of the euler equations. Ph.D. thesis, The University of Michigan (1993)

  9. Huntington-Thresher, W.K.E., Cullis, I.G.: TNT blast scaling for small charges. In: 19th International Symposium of Ballistics, pp. 647–654 (2001)

  10. Hyde, D.W.: CONWEP: Conventional weapons effects program. Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kinney, G.F.: Explosive Shocks in Air, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin (1985)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee, E.L., Horning, H.C., Kury, J.W.: Adiabatic expansion of high explosive detonation products (1968). University of California Report No. UCRL-50422

  13. Pullin, D.I.: Direct simulation methods for compressible inviscid ideal-gas flow. J. Comput. Phys. 34(2), 231–244 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Richardson, L.F.: The approximate arithmetical solution by finite differences of physical problems involving differential equations, with an application to the stresses in a Masonry dam. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Series A 210, 307–357 (1908)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Ritzel, D.V., Matthews, K.: An adjustable explosion–source model for CFD blast calculations. In: 21st International Symposium on Shock Waves (1997). Paper 6590

  16. Roache, P.J.: Quantification of uncertainty in computational fluid dynamics. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 29, 123–160 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Roache, P.J.: Verification and Validation in Computational Science and Engineering. Hermosa, Albuquerque (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rose, T.A.: An approach to the evaluation of blast loads on finite and semi-infinite structures. Ph.D. thesis, Cranfield University, Engineering Systems Department (2001)

  19. Rose, T.A., Smith, P.D.: Development of an adaptive mesh CFD code for high explosive blast simulation. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Interaction of the Effects of Munitions with Structures, New Orleans (2005)

  20. Rose, T.A., Smith, P.D., Brittle, M.: Analysis of a generic cityscape using an adaptive mesh CFD code. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Interaction of the Effects of Munitions with Structures, New Orleans (2005)

  21. Tang, J.: A simple axisymmetric extension to virtual cell embedding. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 55(8), 785–791 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Timofeev, E., Voinovich, P., Takayama, K.: Adaptive unstructured simulation of three-dimensional blast waves with ground surface effect. In: 36th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit (1998). AIAA 98-0544

  23. Van Leer, B.: Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. V. A second order sequel to Godunov’s method. J. Comput. Phys. 32, 101–136 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wada, Y., Liou, M.S.: An accurate and robust flux splitting scheme for shock and contact discontinuities. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 18(3), 633–657 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Tang.

Additional information

Communicated by E. Timofeev.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tang, J. Free-field blast parameter errors from Cartesian cell representations of bursting sphere-type charges. Shock Waves 18, 11–20 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-008-0133-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-008-0133-2

Keywords

PACS

Navigation