Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis
An objective diagnostic method to understand vaginal laxity (VL) is still missing. The aim of our study is to determine whether vaginal wall thickness (VWT) measured by ultrasound may differ according to the abdominal or vaginal techniques and to assess whether clinical variables are associated with vaginal measurements of women with VL.
Methods
A cross-sectional study conducted at a tertiary hospital included 82 women aged ≥ 18 years with VL complaints assessed by the Vaginal Laxity Questionnaire. Women who reported severe comorbidities or vulvovaginal disorders, previous treatment for VL, and use of vaginal estrogen in the last 6 months were excluded. Participants reporting VL underwent transabdominal (TAUS) and transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) and physical examination and answered validated questionnaires. Descriptive data were given as mean and standard deviation, median (range), and absolute and relative frequency. The significance level adopted for this study was 5%. Sample size calculation was not performed for the present study.
Results
Mean age was 41.20 ± 8.64 years, and most participants were multiparous, with previous vaginal delivery and having vaginal intercourse. A statistically significant difference (up to 3 mm) between TAUS and TVUS measurements of the VWT was found in the proximal, middle-third, and distal compartments. A significant correlation was found between VWT and TAUS or TVUS in the mid-third and distal compartments.
Conclusion
A significant correlation was found between the VWT measurements in TVUS and TAUS. Our findings might give the health professional more possibilities for investigating VWT according to patient characteristics.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dietz HP, Stankiewicz M, Atan IK, Ferreira CW, Socha M. Vaginal laxity: what does this symptom mean? Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29(5):723–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3426-0.
Haylen B, De Ridder D, Freeman R, Swift S, Berghmans B, Lee J. International Continence Society. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29(1):4–20.
Millheiser LS, Pauls RN, Herbst SJ, Chen BH. Radiofrequency treatment of vaginal laxity after vaginal delivery: nonsurgical vaginal tightening. J Sex Med. 2010;7(9):3088–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.01910.x.
Bray R, Derpapas A, Fernando R, Khullar V, Panayi DC. Does the vaginal wall become thinner as prolapse grade increases? Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(3):397–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-3150-1.
Balica AC, Cooper AM, McKevitt MK, et al. Dyspareunia related to GSM: association of total vaginal thickness via transabdominal ultrasound. J Sex Med. 2019;16(12):2038–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.08.019.
da Silva Lara LA, da Silva AR, Rosa ESJC, et al. Menopause leading to increased vaginal wall thickness in women with genital prolapse: impact on sexual response. J Sex Med. 2009;6(11):3097–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01407.x.
Peker H, Gursoy A. Relationship between genitourinary syndrome of menopause and 3D high-frequency endovaginal ultrasound measurement of vaginal wall thickness. J Sex Med. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2021.05.004.
Weber AM, Walters MD. Anterior vaginal prolapse: review of anatomy and techniques of surgical repair. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89(2):311–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-7844(96)00322-5.
Krychman ML. Vaginal laxity issues, answers and implications for female sexual function. J Sex Med. 2016;13(10):1445–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.07.016.
Aydin S, Bakar RZ, Arioğlu Aydin Ç, Ateş S. Correlation between transperineal 3-dimensional ultrasound measurements of levator hiatus and female sexual function. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2017;23(6):433–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/spv.0000000000000407.
Thibault-Gagnon S, McLean L, Goldfinger C, Pukall C, Chamberlain S. Differences in the biometry of the levator hiatus at rest, during contraction, and during Valsalva maneuver between women with and without provoked vestibulodynia assessed by transperineal ultrasound imaging. J Sex Med. 2016;13(2):243–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2015.12.009.
Manzini C, Friedman T, Turel F, Dietz HP. Vaginal laxity: which measure of levator ani distensibility is most predictive? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020;55(5):683–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.21873.
Pereira GMV, Juliato CRT, de Almeida CM, et al. Effect of radiofrequency and pelvic floor muscle training in the treatment of women with vaginal laxity: A study protocol. PLoS One. 2021;16(11):e0259650. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259650.
Millheiser LS, Pauls RN, Herbst SJ, Chen BH. Radiofrequency treatment of vaginal laxity after vaginal delivery: nonsurgical vaginal tightening. J Sexual Med. 2010;7(9):3088–95.
Balica A, Wald-Spielman D, Schertz K, Egan S, Bachmann G. Assessing the thickness of the vaginal wall and vaginal mucosa in pre-menopausal versus post-menopausal women by transabdominal ultrasound: A feasibility study. Maturitas. 2017;102:69–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2017.02.017.
Panayi DC, Digesu GA, Tekkis P, Fernando R, Khullar V. Ultrasound measurement of vaginal wall thickness: a novel and reliable technique. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(10):1265–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-010-1183-4.
Balica A, Schertz K, Wald-Spielman D, Egan S, Bachmann G. Transabdominal sonography to measure the total vaginal and mucosal thicknesses. J Clin Ultrasound. 2017;45(8):461–4. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.22497.
Haylen BT, Maher CF, Barber MD, et al. Erratum to: An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(4):655–84.
Laycock J. Female pelvic floor assessment: the Laycock ring of continence. J Natl Women Health Group Aust Physiother Assoc. 1994:40–51.
Wiegel M, Meston C, Rosen R. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): Cross-validation and development of clinical cutoff scores. J Sex Marital Ther. 2005;31(1):1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00926230590475206.
Tamanini JTN, Almeida FG, Girotti ME, Riccetto CL, Palma PC, Rios LAS. The Portuguese validation of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire—Vaginal Symptoms (ICIQ-VS) for Brazilian women with pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2008;19(10):1385–91.
Tamanini JT, Dambros M, D'Ancona CA, Palma PC, Rodrigues Netto N Jr. Validation of the "International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire—Short Form" (ICIQ-SF) for Portuguese. Rev Saude Publica. 2004;38(3):438–44 S0034-89102004000300015.
Avery K, Donovan J, Peters TJ, Shaw C, Gotoh M, Abrams P. ICIQ: a brief and robust measure for evaluating the symptoms and impact of urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2004;23(4):322–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.20041.
Khullar V, Salvatore S, Cardozo L, Bourne TH, Abbott D, Kelleher C. A novel technique for measuring bladder wall thickness in women using transvaginal ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1994;4(3):220–3. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-0705.1994.04030220.x.
Khullar V, Cardozo LD, Salvatore S, Hill S. Ultrasound: a noninvasive screening test for detrusor instability. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996;103(9):904–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1996.tb09910.x.
Panayi DC, Khullar V, Fernando R, Tekkis P. Transvaginal ultrasound measurement of bladder wall thickness: a more reliable approach than transperineal and transabdominal approaches. BJU Int. 2010;106(10):1519–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09367.x.
DeLancey JO, Starr RA. Histology of the connection between the vagina and levator ani muscles. Implications for urinary tract function. J Reprod Med. 1990;35(8):765–71.
Kanmaz AG, İnan AH, Beyan E, et al. Transabdominal ultrasonography: A non-invasive method for diagnosing vaginal atrophy. Post Reprod Health. 2020;26(4):220–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053369120921079.
Gravina GL, Brandetti F, Martini P, et al. Measurement of the thickness of the urethrovaginal space in women with or without vaginal orgasm. J Sex Med. 2008;5(3):610–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2007.00739.x.
Manzini C, Friedman T, Turel F, Dietz HP. Vaginal laxity: what measure of levator ani distensibility is the most predictive? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.21873.
Hsu Y, Chen L, Delancey JO, Ashton-Miller JA. Vaginal thickness, cross-sectional area, and perimeter in women with and those without prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105(5 Pt 1):1012–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000158127.97690.4e.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Dr. Rodrigo Menezes Jales for the administrative support, Dr. Helymar Machado, for the statistical analysis, and the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) for the support given to our study.
Funding
First author: Scholarship Grant 2019/26723-5, São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP). The remaining authors reported no disclosures.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
GMVP: Protocol/project development; Data collection or management; Data analysis; Manuscript writing/editing
CRTJ: Protocol/project development; Data collection or management; Data analysis; Manuscript writing/editing
CMA: Data collection or management; Data analysis; Manuscript writing/editing
ISV: Data collection or management; Data analysis
KCA: Data collection or management; Data analysis
LGOB: Protocol/project development; Data collection or management; Data analysis; Manuscript writing/editing
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interests
None.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pereira, G.M.V., Juliato, C.R.T., de Almeida, C.M. et al. Measurement of the vaginal wall thickness by transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound of women with vaginal laxity: a cross-sectional study. Int Urogynecol J 33, 3563–3572 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05184-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05184-8