Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis
Neuropathy following pelvic surgery is an uncommon but important complication. The current literature about the natural history and treatment of these neuropathies is limited. We aim to describe the characteristics, treatments and natural history of postoperative neuropathy following benign gynecologic surgery.
Methods
This retrospective case series included patients who underwent benign gynecologic surgery for ≥ 60 min in lithotomy. Patients with preexisting neurologic disease were excluded. Patient demographics, identification of postoperative neuropathy and details regarding evaluation and treatment were obtained from the medical record. Neuropathies were characterized by anatomic location and nerve/dermatome distribution. Duration of symptoms was classified as < 1 week, 1 week to 3 months or > 3 months with neuropathy symptoms grouped as resolved, persistent but improved or persistent. Data were analyzed with appropriate descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation and chi-square test.
Results
The study included 2449 patients who had undergone benign gynecologic surgery, with 78 (3.2%) patients identified as having postoperative neuropathy. Most patients with neuropathies demonstrated either complete resolution [59 (75.6%)] or persistent but improved [13 (16.7%)] symptoms. Twenty-eight (35.9%) had symptoms of ≥ 3 months. Most neuropathies were sensory only [63 (80.8%)], and the most frequently documented nerve distribution was femoral [23 (29.5%)]. Evaluation and treatment of neuropathy most commonly included physical therapy consult [17 (21.8%)] and neurology consult [8 (10.3%)].
Conclusions
The incidence of postoperative neuropathy in this large, benign gynecologic surgery population was 3.2%. Most neuropathies are sensory only and self-limited. While physical therapy was the most common treatment, most patients received no specific intervention.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cardosi RJ, Cox CS, Hoffman MS. Postoperative neuropathies after major pelvic surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;100(2):240–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-7844(02)02052-5.
Warner MA, Warner DO, Harper CM, Schroeder DR, Maxson PM. Lower extremity neuropathies associated with lithotomy positions. Anesthesiology. 2000;93(4):938–42. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200010000-00010.
Warner MA, Martin JT, Schroeder DR, Offord KP, Chute CG. Lower-extremity motor neuropathy associated with surgery performed on patients in a lithotomy position. Anesthesiology. 1994;81(1):6–12. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199407000-00004.
Whitis AM, Chen E, Sekhon M, Akella S, Bradley CS, Kowalski JT. Postoperative lower extremity neuropathy with boot stirrups compared with candy cane stirrups. Obstet Gynecol. 2021;137(5):916–23. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000004353.
Bohrer JC, Walters MD, Park A, Polston D, Barber MD. Pelvic nerve injury following gynecologic surgery: a prospective cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201(5):531 e1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2009.07.023.
Irvin W, Andersen W, Taylor P, Rice L. Minimizing the risk of neurologic injury in gynecologic surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103(2):374–82. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000110542.53489.c6.
Benito-Leon J, Picardo A, Garrido A, Cuberes R. Gabapentin therapy for genitofemoral and ilioinguinal neuralgia. J Neurol. 2001;248(10):907–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004150170080.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Edison Chen: Project development, data collection, manuscript writing
Joseph T Kowalski: Project development, data collection, manuscript writing
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Edison Chen: NIH Kirschstein National Research Service Award (NRSA) training grant
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, E., Kowalski, J.T. Natural history of postoperative neuropathies in gynecologic surgery. Int Urogynecol J 33, 2471–2474 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05183-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05183-9