Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Validation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the questionnaire for the assessment of pelvic floor disorders and their risk factors during pregnancy and postpartum

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Pelvic floor dysfunction may be treated and prevented during pregnancy and postpartum, as it decreases women’s quality of life. The aim of the present study was to translate and validate the Brazilian Portuguese questionnaire for the assessment of pelvic floor disorders and their risk factors during pregnancy and postpartum.

Methods

This is a cross-sectional study. Two translators fluent in German translated the German version of the questionnaire into English. The back translation was performed by two other translators. The final version was tested on Brazilian pregnant/puerperal women. The participants answered the questionnaire twice, with an interval of 7–10 days between sessions. They also completed the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). To evaluate the test–retest reliability, we used the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Cronbach's alpha coefficient, to test the internal consistency, and Pearson's linear correlation to assess construct validity.

Results

Sixty-six women were included (77% pregnant; 23% puerperal women), with a mean age of 26.5 ± 5.8 years and a body mass index of 26.4 ± 5.7 kg/cm2. There were no missing ceiling or floor effects. The construct validity presented a moderate correlation with the role physical domain of the SF-36 (r = −0.48), the ICC test–retest showed good reliability of 0.72, and the internal consistency was 0.71.

Conclusions

These results provide evidence that the questionnaire for the assessment of pelvic floor disorders and their risk factors during pregnancy and postpartum is a valid and reliable instrument when utilized in Brazilian pregnant and postpartum women.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schreiner L, Crivelatti I, de Oliveira JM, et al. Systematic review of pelvic floor interventions during pregnancy. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2018;143:10–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kahyaoglu Sut H, Balkanli Kaplan P. Effect of pelvic floor muscle exercise on pelvic floor muscle activity and voiding functions during pregnancy and the postpartum period: effect of pregnancy and delivery on pelvic floor. Neurourol Urodyn. 2016;35:417–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.22728.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Palmezoni VP, Santos MD, Pereira JM, et al. Pelvic floor muscle strength in primigravidae and non-pregnant nulliparous women: a comparative study. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28:131–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-3088-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Iglesia C. Pelvic floor changes: consequences of pregnancy and delivery. BJOG. 2016;123:830. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13538.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hill A-M, McPhail SM, Wilson JM, Berlach RG. Pregnant women’s awareness, knowledge and beliefs about pelvic floor muscles: a cross-sectional survey. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28:1557–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3309-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Castro-Pardiñas MA, Torres-Lacomba M, Navarro-Brazález B. Función muscular del suelo pélvico en mujeres sanas, puérperas y con disfunciones del suelo pélvico. Actas Urol Esp. 2017;41:249–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acuro.2016.11.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wu JM, Hundley AF, Fulton RG, Myers ER. Forecasting the prevalence of pelvic floor disorders in U.S. women: 2010 to 2050. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114:1278–83. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c2ce96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Leon-Larios F, Corrales-Gutierrez I, Casado-Mejía R, Suarez-Serrano C. Influence of a pelvic floor training programme to prevent perineal trauma: a quasi-randomised controlled trial. Midwifery. 2017;50:72–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2017.03.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hallock JL, Handa VL. The epidemiology of pelvic floor disorders and childbirth. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2016;43:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogc.2015.10.008.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Colla C, Paiva LL, Ferla L, et al. Pelvic floor dysfunction in the immediate puerperium, and 1 and 3 months after vaginal or cesarean delivery. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2018;143:94–100. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bø K, Hilde G, Stær-Jensen J, et al. Postpartum pelvic floor muscle training and pelvic organ prolapse—a randomized trial of primiparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212:38.e1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2014.06.049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wallwiener CW, Wallwiener L-M, Seeger H, et al. Sexual function, contraception, relationship, and lifestyle in female medical students. J Womens Health. 2017;26:169–77. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2015.5731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Schraffordt Koops SE, Vervest HAM, Oostvogel HJM. Anorectal symptoms after various modes of vaginal delivery. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2003;14:244–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-003-1040-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Solans-Domènech M, Sánchez E, Espuña-Pons M. Urinary and anal incontinence during pregnancy and postpartum: incidence, severity, and risk factors. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115:618–28. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181d04dff.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Metz M, Junginger B, Henrich W, Baeßler K. Development and validation of a questionnaire for the assessment of pelvic floor disorders and their risk factors during pregnancy and post partum. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2017;77:358–65. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-102693.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Mokkink L, Terwee C, Patrick D, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63:737–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Baessler K, O’Neill SM, Maher CF, Battistutta D. A validated self-administered female pelvic floor questionnaire. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21:163–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-0997-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Palmieri S, Cola A, Ceccherelli A, et al. Italian validation of the German pelvic floor questionnaire for pregnant and postpartum women. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020;248:133–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.03.032.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Koyuncu K, Sakin O, Akalın EE, et al. Translation, cultural adaptation, and validation and reliability of assessment of pelvic floor disorders and their risk factors during pregnancy and postpartum questionnaire in Turkish population. Ginekol Pol. 2020;91:12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25:3186–91. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Campolina AG, Bortoluzzo AB, Ferraz MB, Ciconelli RM. Validação da versão brasileira do questionário genérico de qualidade de vida short-form 6 dimensions (SF-6D Brasil). Ciênc Saúde Coletiva. 2011;16:3103–10. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232011000800010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. De Vet HCW, Mokkink LB, Mosmuller DG, Terwee CB. Spearman-Brown prophecy formula and Cronbach’s alpha: different faces of reliability and opportunities for new applications. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017;85:45–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.01.013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fleiss J, Levin B, Paik M. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. Hoboken: Wiley; 2003.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Terwee CB, Bot SDM, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Arouca M, Duarte T, Lott D, et al. Validation and cultural translation for Brazilian Portuguese version of the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7) and Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20). Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27:1097–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2938-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Peterson TV, Pinto RA, Davila GW, et al. Validation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the pelvic floor bother questionnaire. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30:81–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3627-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Campolina AG, Ciconelli RM. O SF-36 e o desenvolvimento de novas medidas de avaliação de qualidade de vida. Acta Reumatol Port. 2008;33:127–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Anthoine E, Moret L, Regnault A, et al. Sample size used to validate a scale: a review of publications on newly-developed patient reported outcomes measures. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014;12:176. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-014-0176-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Zuchelo LTS, Bezerra IMP, Da Silva ATM, et al. Questionnaires to evaluate pelvic floor dysfunction in the postpartum period: a systematic review. Int J Womens Health. 2018;10:409–24. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S164266.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brasil (CAPES)—Finance Code 001 and grant #2018/26718–9, São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Women’s Health Research Laboratory, Department of Physical Therapy, Federal University of São Carlos, Rodovia Washington Luís, 235 km, São Carlos, SP, CEP: 13565-905, Brazil

    Renata Cristina Martins da Silva Vieira, Jordana Barbosa da Silva & Patricia Driusso

  2. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil

    Ricardo de Carvalho Cavalli

Authors
  1. Renata Cristina Martins da Silva Vieira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jordana Barbosa da Silva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ricardo de Carvalho Cavalli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Patricia Driusso
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

R.C.M. da Silva Vieira: project development, data collection and analysis, manuscript writing, and final approval of the version to be published; J.B. da Silva: data collection, drafting and revising the article critically, and final approval of the version to be published; R. de Carvalho Cavalli: drafting and revising the article critically, and final approval of the version to be published; P. Driusso: project development, data analysis, drafting and revising the article critically, and final approval of the version to be published.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patricia Driusso.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the Ethics and Research Committee of the Federal University of São Carlos.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 73 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

da Silva Vieira, R.C.M., Silva, J.B.d., de Carvalho Cavalli, R. et al. Validation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the questionnaire for the assessment of pelvic floor disorders and their risk factors during pregnancy and postpartum. Int Urogynecol J 33, 3155–3161 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05101-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05101-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation