Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis
Oral pentosan polysulphate (PPS) has been used in the treatment of bladder pain syndrome/interstitial cystitis (BPS/IC) for almost 35 years. However, in some recent studies, questions have been raised about its efficacy in treating this condition. We aimed to evaluate the published medical literature and discuss the clinical utility of oral PPS in the treatment of BPS/IC.
Methods
PUBMED was searched for BPS/IC, treatment and PPS. Of the initial 398 articles screened, 7 randomized controlled trials, 3 systematic reviews and 3 meta-analyses were finally included in this study (Fig. 1). Other relevant literature such as observational studies and various clinical guidelines was also reviewed. The inclusion criteria, intervention methodology and end points of the studies were examined.
Results
Of the seven RCTs, five found a clear beneficial role of oral PPS in IC/BPS. The only study which did not have cystoscopy as a diagnostic and inclusion criterion failed to show any benefit of oral PPS compared to placebo. Two out of three meta-analyses clearly concluded that oral PPS had a positive role to play in the treatment of BPS/IC. Various open-label studies did conclude in favour of oral PPS as a treatment modality for these patients.
Conclusion
Oral PPS remains a useful pharmacological agent for treatment of BPS/IC, even though it may be effective only in a subgroup of patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- BPS:
-
Bladder pain syndrome
- IC:
-
Interstitial cystitis
- PPS:
-
Pentosan polysulphate
- GAG:
-
Glycosaminoglycan
- ICS:
-
International Continence Society
- IUGA:
-
International Urogynecology Association
- ICI:
-
International Consultation on Incontinence
- NIDDK:
-
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
- GRA:
-
Global response assessment
- PORIS:
-
Patient Overall Rating of Improvement of Symptoms
- ICSI:
-
Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Index
- PRISMA:
-
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
- RCT:
-
Randomized controlled trial
References
Hanno PM, Nordling J, Staskin DR, Wein AJ, Wyndaele JJ. Bladder pain syndrome—an evolution. USA: Springer; 2018.
Gillenwater JY, Wein AJ. Summary of the National Institute of Arthritis, Diabetes, Digestive and Didney Diseases workshop on interstitial cystitis, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland. J Urol. 1988;140:203–6.
Offiah I, McMahon SB, O’Reilly BA. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24:1243–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-013-2057-3.
Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U, et al. The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Urology. 2003;61(1):37–49.
Hanno P, Lin A, Nordling J, Nyberg L, van Ophoven A, Ueda T, et al. Bladder pain syndrome committee of the International Consultation on Incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29(1):191–8.
Parsons CL, Mulholland SG. Successful therapy of interstitial cystitis with pentosanpolysulfate. J Urol. 1987;138(3):513–6.
van Ophoven A, Vonde K, Koch W, Auerbach G, Maag KP. Efficacy of pentosan polysulfate for the treatment of interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome: results of a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Curr Med Res Opin. 2019;35(9):1495–503.
Wyndaele JJJ, Riedl C, Taneja R, Lovász S, Ueda T, Cervigni M. GAG replenishment therapy for bladder pain syndrome/interstitial cystitis. Neurourol Urodyn. 2019;38(2):535–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23900.
Tirlapur SA, Birch JV, Carberry CL, Khan KS, Latthe PM, Jha S, et al. On behalf of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Management of bladder pain syndrome. BJOG. 2016;124:e46–72.
Nickel JC, Herschorn S, Whitmore KE, Forrest JB, Hu P, Friedman AJ, et al. Pentosan polysulfate sodium for treatment of interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome: insights from a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled study. J Urol. 2015;193(3):857–62.
Fritjofsson A, Fall M, Juhlin R, Persson BE, Ruutu M. Treatment of ulcer and nonulcer interstitial cystitis with sodium pentosanpolysulfate: a multicenter trial. J Urol. 1987;138(3):508–12.
Hanno PM. Analysis of long-term Elmiron therapy for interstitial cystitis. Urology. 1997;49(5A Suppl):93–9.
Jepsen JV, Sall M, Rhodes PR, Schmidt D, Messing E, Bruskewitz RC. Long-term experience with pentosanpolysulfate in interstitial cystitis. Urology. 1998;51(3):381–7.
Al-Zahrani AA, Gajewski JB. Long-term efficacy and tolerability of pentosan polysulphate sodium in the treatment of bladder pain syndrome. Can Urol Assoc J. 2011;5(2):113–8. https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.10095.
Holm-Bentzen M, Jacobsen F, Nerstrøm B, Lose G, Kristensen JK, Pedersen RH, et al. A prospective double-blind clinically controlled multicenter trial of sodium pentosan polysulfate in the treatment of interstitial cystitis and related painful bladder disease. J Urol. 1987;138(3):503–7.
Mulholland SG, Hanno P, Parsons CL, Sant GR, Staskin DR. Pentosan polysulfate sodium for therapy of interstitial cystitis. A double-blind placebo-controlled clinical study. Urology. 1990;35(6):552–8.
Parsons CL, Benson G, Childs SJ, Hanno P, Sant GR, Webster G. A quantitatively controlled method to study prospectively interstitial cystitis and demonstrate the efficacy of pentosan polysulfate. J Urol. 1993;150(3):845–8.
Nickel JC, Barkin J, Forrest J, Mosbaugh PG, Hernandez-Graulau J, Kaufman D, et al. Randomized, double-blind, dose-ranging study of pentosan polysulfate sodium for interstitial cystitis. Urology. 2005;65(4):654–8.
Sant GR, Propert KJ, Hanno PM, Burks D, Culkin D, Diokno AC, et al. A pilot clinical trial of oral pentosan polysulfate and oral hydroxyzine in patients with interstitial cystitis. J Urol. 2003;170(3):810–5.
Dimitrakov J, Kroenke K, Steers WD, Berde C, Zurakowski D, Freeman MR, et al. Pharmacologic management of painful bladder syndrome/interstitial cystitis: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(18):1922–9. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.167.18.1922.
Pazin C, de Souza Mitidieri AM, Silva APM, et al. Treatment of bladder pain syndrome and interstitial cystitis: a systematic review. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27:697–708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2815-5.
Santos TGD, Miranda IAS, Nygaard CC, Schreiner L, Castro RA, Haddad JM. Systematic review of oral therapy for the treatment of symptoms of bladder pain syndrome: the Brazilian guidelines. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2018;40(2):96–102. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1609049.
Hwang P, Auclair B, Beechinor D, Diment M, Einarson TR. Efficacy of pentosan polysulfate in the treatment of interstitial cystitis: a meta-analysis. Urology. 1997;50(1):39–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(97)00110.
Giannantoni A, Bini V, Dmochowski R, Hanno P, Nickel JC, Proietti S, et al. Contemporary management of the painful bladder: a systematic review. Eur Urol. 2012;61(1):29–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2011.07.069.
Pearce WA, Chen R, Jain N. Pigmentary maculopathy associated with chronic exposure to pentosan polysulfate sodium. Ophthalmology. 2018;125(11):1793–802.
Wang D, Au A, Gunnemann F, Hilely A, Scharf J, Tran K, et al. Pentosan-associated maculopathy: prevalence, screening guidelines, and spectrum of findings based on prospective multimodal analysis. Can J Ophthalmol. 2020;55(2):116–25.
Wein AJ. Re: Pigmentary maculopathy associated with chronic exposure to pentosan polysulfate sodium. J Urol. 2002;203(2):259–60.
Acknowledgements
This is to acknowledge the invaluable help of Dr. Ranadip Choudhury in the PUBMED search, short listing and listing of the relevant publications during the initial part of the data collection.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Taneja, R. Current status of oral pentosan polysulphate in bladder pain syndrome/interstitial cystitis. Int Urogynecol J 32, 1107–1115 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04517-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04517-9