Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Laparoscopic management of pelvic organ prolapse recurrence after open sacrocervicopexy

  • IUJ Video
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this narrated video we present a case of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) recurrence 12 years after sacrocervicopexy, outline our management and suggest an optimal laparoscopic surgical technique that may reduce the risk of future recurrence. A 71-year-old patient, who had undergone an open sub-total hysterectomy with sacrocervicopexy 12 years previously, complained of a bulging sensation in her vagina, of 12 months’ duration. On physical examination, a Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) stage III prolapse was diagnosed, with marked apical, anterior and posterior compartment prolapse. On laparoscopy we identified the old mesh attached to the promontory and to the vaginal apex, without any fixation of the vaginal walls. Complete mesh excision was performed, followed by vaginal dissection to facilitate implantation of two new meshes and performing a new sacrocolpopexy. No postoperative complications occurred. Over 6 weeks of post-operative follow-up, there was no pelvic pain, dysuria or dyschezia. A good anatomical result was noted without any prolapse. Laparoscopy appears to be an effective approach to complete mesh excision. For the treatment of prolapse recurrence, complete excision of the old mesh with new pelvic mesh-augmented reconstruction is recommended. Thorough dissection of the vesico-vaginal and recto-vaginal spaces followed by mesh fixation to the relevant vaginal walls may reduce recurrence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Coolen AWM, Bui BN, Dietz V, Wang R, van Montfoort APA, Mol BWJ, et al. The treatment of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28:1767–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3493-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. De Gouveia De Sa M, Claydon LS, Whitlow B, Dolcet Artahona MA. Laparoscopic versus open sacrocolpopexy for treatment of prolapse of the apical segment of the vagina: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27:3–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2765-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Biler A, Ertas IE, Tosun G, Hortu I, Turkay U, Gultekin OE, et al. Perioperative complications and short-term outcomes of abdominal sacrocolpopexy, laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy, and laparoscopic pectopexy for apical prolapse. Int Braz J Urol. 2018;44:996–1004. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2017.0692.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Baines G, Price N, Jefferis H, Cartwright R, Jackson SR. Mesh-related complications of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30(9):1475–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-03952-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dandolu V, Akiyama M, Allenback G, Pathak P. Mesh complications and failure rates after transvaginal mesh repair compared with abdominal or laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and to native tissue repair in treating apical prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28:215–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-3108-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Christmann-Schmid C, Haya N, Brown J. Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;10:CD012376. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012376.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Vandendriessche D, Sussfeld J, Giraudet G, Lucot J-P, Behal H, Cosson M. Complications and reoperations after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with a mean follow-up of 4 years. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28:231–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-3093-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mohr S, Siegenthaler F, Imboden S, Kuhn A, Mueller MD. Transvaginal excision of an eroded Sacrocolpopexy mesh by using single-incision laparoscopic surgery equipment. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017;24:1079–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2017.04.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chamsy D, Lee T. Laparoscopic excision of sacrocolpopexy mesh. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014;21:986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2014.07.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gluck O, Grinstein E, Blaganje M, Veit-Rubin N, Deval B. Rectal injury during laparoscopic mesh removal after sacrocervicopexy. Int Urogynecol J. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-04168-5.

  11. Myers EM, Siff L, Osmundsen B, Geller E, Matthews CA. Differences in recurrent prolapse at 1 year after total vs supracervical hysterectomy and robotic sacrocolpopexy. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26:585–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2551-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tan-Kim J, Menefee SA, Luber KM, Nager CW, Lukacz ES. Prevalence and risk factors for mesh erosion after laparoscopic-assisted sacrocolpopexy. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22:205–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-010-1265-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Moroni RM, Juliato CRTT, Cosson M, Giraudet G, Brito LGOO. Does sacrocolpopexy present heterogeneity in its surgical technique? A systematic review. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018;37:2335–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23764.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wong V, Guzman Rojas R, Shek KL, Chou D, Moore KH, Dietz HP. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: how low does the mesh go? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;49:404–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.15882.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Habib N, Centini G, Pizzoferrato A-C, Bui C, Argay I, Bader G. Laparoscopic promontofixation: where to stop the anterior dissection? Med Hypotheses. 2019;124:60–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MEHY.2019.02.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cosma S, Petruzzelli P, Chiadò Fiorio Tin M, Parisi S, Olearo E, Fassio F, et al. Simplified laparoscopic sacropexy avoiding deep vaginal dissection. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2018;143:239–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

E.G.: data collection, laparoscopy filming, video preparation, manuscript preparation; O.G.: data collection, video preparation, manuscript preparation; N.V.R.: data collection, video preparation, manuscript preparation; B.D.: data collection, laparoscopy filming, video preparation, manuscript preparation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruno Deval.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for filming and publication of the video material and any accompanying images.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

This video demonstrates a case of laparoscopic complete mesh excision and new sacrocolpopexy in a patient with pelvic organ prolapse after a previous sacrocervicopexy. We discuss the possible reason for recurrence and suggest a surgical technique that may reduce recurrence rates (MP4 91750 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Grinstein, E., Gluck, O., Veit-Rubin, N. et al. Laparoscopic management of pelvic organ prolapse recurrence after open sacrocervicopexy. Int Urogynecol J 31, 1965–1968 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04283-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04283-8

Navigation