Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Subjective versus objective determination of bladder emptying following urogynecological surgery: “do you feel that you completely emptied your bladder?”

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

We tested the hypothesis that women can subjectively determine if they have emptied their bladder after a spontaneous voiding attempt following urogynecological surgery to rule out post-operative urinary retention as determined by a voiding trial.

Methods

This is a prospective observational study of women undergoing urogynecological surgery at two academic institutions from June 2016 to March 2019. Following surgery, subjects underwent a voiding trial followed by measurement of the PVR via ultrasound bladder scan or straight catheterization. A successful voiding trial was defined as a PVR of ≤150 ml. Subjects were queried about their subjective sensation of bladder emptying; “Do you feel that you completely emptied your bladder?” Their responses were either “Yes”, “No” or “I don’t know”. Their subjective responses were correlated with the voiding trial results using a Chi-squared analysis for sensitivity, specificity, and positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV).

Results

A total of 266 subjects were included in the final evaluation. The screening subjective question had a sensitivity of 85.7% (CI 71.46 to 94.57%), a specificity of 91.5% (CI 87.01 to 94.79%), a PPV of 65.4% (CI 54.78 to 74.77%), and an NPV of 97.14% (CI 94.18 to 98.62%) to detect a failed voiding trial.

Conclusions

The NPV of the subjective question regarding bladder emptying in the post-operative urogynecological setting is high at >97%, suggesting that it might be reasonable to forgo a formal voiding trial in patients who subjectively feel that they have emptied their bladder.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adelowo AO, Hacker MR, Merport Modest A, et al. Do symptoms of voiding dysfunction predict urinary retention? Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2012;18:344–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alas A, Hidalgo R, Espaillat L, et al. Does spinal anesthesia lead to postoperative urinary retention in same-day urogynecology surgery? A retrospective review. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30:1283–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Geller EJ. Prevention and management of postoperative urinary retention after urogynecologic surgery. Int J Womens Health. 2014;6:829–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Barber MD, Walters MD, Bump RC. Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193:103–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Shumaker SA, Wyman JF, Uebersax JS, et al. Health-related quality of life measures for women with urinary incontinence: the incontinence impact questionnaire and the urogenital distress inventory. Continence program in women (CPW) research group. Qual Life Res. 1994;3:291–306.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Baldini G, Bagry H, Aprikian A, et al. Postoperative urinary retention: anesthetic and perioperative considerations. Anesthesiology. 2009;110:1139–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Smithling KR, Mwesigwa PJ, Siddiquie MM, et al. (2018) Risk factors for incomplete bladder emptying after prolapse repairs and slings. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000000595.

  8. Hakvoort RA, Dijkgraaf MG, Burger MP, et al. Predicting short-term urinary retention after vaginal prolapse surgery. Neurourol Urodyn. 2009;28:225–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sokol AI, Jelovsek JE, Walters MD, et al. Incidence and predictors of prolonged urinary retention after TVT with and without concurrent prolapse surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192:1537–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Carter-Brooks CM, Zyczynski HM, Moalli PA, et al. Early catheter removal after pelvic floor reconstructive surgery: a randomized trial. Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29:1203–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Darrah DM, Griebling TL, Silverstein JH. Postoperative urinary retention. Anesthesiol Clin. 2009;27:465–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

KK: project development, data collection and analysis, manuscript writing; AE: protocol and project development, data collection, manuscript editing; SS: protocol and project development, data collection, manuscript editing; VG: protocol supervision data collection, database development; LM: data collection, database construction; DC: data collection; MN: data collection.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven Swift.

Ethics declarations

Financial disclaimer/conflicts of interest

Swift: local PI research Cook Myosite, legal consultant Boston Scientific. The remaining authors claim that they no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kesty, K., Edenfield, A., Castro, D. et al. Subjective versus objective determination of bladder emptying following urogynecological surgery: “do you feel that you completely emptied your bladder?”. Int Urogynecol J 31, 1899–1905 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-04216-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-04216-0

Keywords

Navigation