Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Urodynamic profile of voiding in patients with pelvic organ prolapse after surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis

  • Review Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a defect of the female pelvic floor. Stress urinary incontinence (SUI), urge urinary incontinence (UUI), and obstructive symptoms may occur in these patients. The objective of surgical treatment is to restore the anatomy and function of the pelvic floor; however, it may prompt urinary symptoms not present previously. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine urodynamic changes in patients undergoing surgical correction for POP.

Methods

PubMed and Cochrane databases were searched for studies that contained data from urodynamic evaluation before and after vaginal surgery for POP. The main urodynamic data collected were free uroflowmetry (maximum flow [Qmax], voided volume, and post-void residual volume [PVR]), cystometry (bladder capacity, presence of detrusor overactivity [DO], SUI or UUI, and Valsalva leak point pressure), and pressure × flow study (detrusor pressure at maximum flow [PdetQmax], Qmax, and PVR).

Results

A total of 22 studies were included (1,549 women). Patients had a significantly higher prevalence of DO before surgery (OR = 1.56; 95% CI = 1.06–2.29), and surgeries without sling placement demonstrated a tendency to ameliorate DO. Patients who did not receive a sling were more incontinent after surgery. Bladder-emptying parameters improved after surgery, with higher PdetQmax before surgery (IV = 3.23; 95% CI = 0.45–1.18). Patients who did not receive MUS presented a lower Qmax (IV = −3.19; 95%CI = −4.09 to −2.30) and a higher PVR (IV = 27.89; 95%CI = 15.68–40.1) before surgery.

Conclusion

Correction surgery for POP yields better urodynamic emptying parameters, with a reduction in the prevalence of DO. In contrast, sling placement enhances obstructive parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CI:

Confidence intervals

DO:

Detrusor overactivity

LUTS:

Lower urinary tract symptoms

MUS:

Mid-urethral sling

PdetQmax:

Detrusor pressure at maximum flow

PVR:

Post-void residual volume

Qmax:

Maximum flow

SUI:

Stress Urinary Incontinence

UUI:

Urgency urinary incontinence

VLPP:

Valsalva leak point pressure

References

  1. Barber MD. Pelvic organ prolapse. BMJ. 2016;354:i3853. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i3853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Al-Mandeel H, Ross S, Robert M, Milne J. Incidence of stress urinary incontinence following vaginal repair of pelvic organ prolapse in objectively continent women. Neurourol Urodyn. 2011;30(3):390–4. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.20947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kawasaki A, Corey EG, Laskey RA, Weidner AC, Siddiqui NY, Wu JM. Obesity as a risk for the recurrence of anterior vaginal wall prolapse after anterior colporrhaphy. J Reprod Med. 2013;58:195–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ellerkmann RM, Cundiff GW, Melick CF, Nihira MA, Leffler K, Bent AE. Correlation of symptoms with location and severity of pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185:1332–7; discussion 1337–8. https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2001.119078.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Swift SE. The distribution of pelvic organ support in a population of female subjects seen for routine gynecologic health care. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183:277–85. https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2000.107583.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Trowbridge ER, Fultz NH, Patel DA, DeLancey JO, Fenner DE. Distribution of pelvic organ support measures in a population-based sample of middle-aged, community-dwelling African American and white women in southeastern Michigan. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198:548.e1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2008.01.054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. NICE Guidance—Urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse in women: management: © NICE. Urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse in women: management. BJU Int. 2019;123:777–803. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.14763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lensen EJ, Withagen MI, Kluivers KB, Milani AL, Vierhout ME. Urinary incontinence after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Neurourol Urodyn. 2013;32:455–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.22327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Baessler K, Christmann-Schmid C, Maher C, Haya N, Crawford TJ, Brown J. Surgery for women with pelvic organ prolapse with or without stress urinary incontinence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;8:CD013108. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD013108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wan X, Wang W, Liu J, Tong T. Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14:135. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bump RC, Hurt WG, Theofrastous JP, Addison WA, Fantl JA, Wyman JF, et al. (1996) randomized prospective comparison of needle colposuspension versus endopelvic fascia plication for potential stress incontinence prophylaxis in women undergoing vaginal reconstruction for stage III or IV pelvic organ prolapse. The continence program for women research group. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175(2):326–33; discussion 333–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70142-4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ek M, Tegerstedt G, Falconer C, Kjaeldgaard A, Rezapour M, Rudnicki M, et al. Urodynamic assessment of anterior vaginal wall surgery: a randomized comparison between colporrhaphy and transvaginal mesh. Comparative study; journal article; multicenter study; randomized controlled trial. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29:527–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.20811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Natale F, La Penna C, Padoa A, Agostini M, Panei M, Cervigni M. High levator myorrhaphy versus uterosacral ligament suspension for vaginal vault fixation: a prospective, randomized study. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21:515–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-1064-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Liang CC, Tseng LH, Lo TS, Lin YH, Lin YJ, Chang SD. Sexual function following outside-in transobturator midurethral sling procedures: a prospective study. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23:1693–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1792-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lo TS, Bt Karim N, Cortes EFM, Wu PY, Lin YH, Tan YL. Comparison between Elevate anterior/apical system and Perigee system in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: clinical and sonographic outcomes. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26:391–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2492-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Long CY, Wang CL, Wu MP, Wu CH, Lin KL, Liu CM, et al. Comparison of clinical outcomes using "Elevate Anterior" versus "Perigee" system devices for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:479610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lo TS, Al-Kharabsheh AM, Tan YL, Pue LB, Hsieh WC, Uy-Patrimonio MC. Single incision anterior apical mesh and sacrospinous ligament fixation in pelvic prolapse surgery at 36 months follow-up. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;56:793–800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjog.2017.10.016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bakas P, Papadakis E, Karachalios C, Beta A, Liapis A. Long-term efficacy follow-up of tension-free vaginal tape obturator in patients with stress urinary incontinence with or without cystocele. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018;143:339–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ker CR, Lin KL, Loo ZX, Juan YS, Long CY. Comparison of UpholdTM vaginal mesh procedure with hysterectomy or uterine preservation for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Sci Rep. 2018;8:9438. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27765-8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lo TS, Chua S, Kao CC, Hsieh WC, Wu MP, Tseng LH. Prophylactic midurethral sling insertion during transvaginal pelvic reconstructive surgery for advanced prolapse patients with high-risk predictors of postoperative de novo stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30:1541–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3787-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Borstad E, Rud T. The risk of developing urinary stress-incontinence after vaginal repair in continent women. A clinical and urodynamic follow-up study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1989;68:545–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Colakoğlu M, Capar M, Kiliç M, Colakoğlu U, Kaya H, Acar A. A new needle suspension procedure for genuine stress incontinence and anterior vaginal wall prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1996;7:64–7; discussion 67–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01902374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gordon D, Groutz A, Wolman I, Lessing JB, David MP. Development of postoperative urinary stress incontinence in clinically continent patients undergoing prophylactic Kelly plication during genitourinary prolapse repair. Neurourol Urodyn. 1999;18:193–7; discussion 197–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1520-6777(1999)18:3<193::aid-nau5>3.0.co;2-e

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Groutz A, Gordon D, Wolman I, Jaffa AJ, Kupferminc MJ, David MP, et al. The use of prophylactic Stamey bladder neck suspension to prevent post-operative stress urinary incontinence in clinically continent women undergoing genitourinary prolapse repair. Neurourol Urodyn. 2000;19:671–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6777(2000)19:6<671::aid-nau4>3.0.co;2-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Gordon D, Gold RS, Pauzner D, Lessing JB, Groutz A. Combined genitourinary prolapse repair and prophylactic tension-free vaginal tape in women with severe prolapse and occult stress urinary incontinence: preliminary results. Urology. 2001;58:547–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-4295(01)01327-9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Costantini E, Pajoncini C, Zucchi A, Lombi R, Bini V, Mearini E, et al. Four-corner colposuspension: clinical and functional results. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2003;14:113–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-002-1015-2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Digesu GA, Salvatore S, Chaliha C, Athanasiou S, Milani R, Khullar V. Do overactive bladder symptoms improve after repair of anterior vaginal wall prolapse? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2007;18:1439–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-007-0375-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Chin HY, Chiang CH, Lin KC, Wang CJ, Lee CL, Soong YK. Prospective assessment of overactive bladder symptoms in women who have undergone transvaginal surgery for advanced vaginal wall prolapse: a preliminary report. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2009;35:732–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1447-0756.2008.00999.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lakeman MM, Hakvoort RA, Van de Weijer EP, Emanuel MH, Roovers JP. Anterior colporrhaphy does not induce bladder outlet obstruction. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23:723–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1688-0.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Lo TS, Tan YL, Cortes EF, Pue LB, Wu PY, Al-Kharabsheh A. Anterior-apical single-incision mesh surgery (SIMS): surgical and functional outcomes at 1 year. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015;22:50–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2014.07.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Natale F, Costantini E, La Penna C, Illiano E, Balsamo R, Carbone A, Cervigni M. Trocar-guided trans-vaginal mesh surgery for pelvic organ prolapse: effects on urinary continence and anatomical and functional outcomes. A prospective observational study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017;210:29–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.10.052.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Sayed Ahmed WA, Taha OT, Hamdy MA, Ibrahim ZM, Elshahat AM. Bladder function after sacrospinous hysteropexy and vaginal wall repair in women with uterovaginal prolapse. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018;224:170–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.03.041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wen L, Shek KL, Dietz HP. Changes in urethral mobility and configuration after prolapse repair. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;53:124–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.19165.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Lo TS, Chua S, Uy-Patrimonio MC, Kao CC, Lin CH. Clinical outcomes of detrusor underactivity in female with advanced pelvic organ prolapse following vaginal pelvic reconstructive surgery. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018;37:2242–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Frigerio M, Manodoro S, Cola A, Palmieri S, Spelzini F, Milani R. Detrusor underactivity in pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29:1111–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3532-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Levin RM, Longhurst PA, Barasha B, McGuire EJ, Elbadawi A, Wein AJ. Studies on experimental bladder outlet obstruction in the cat: long-term functional effects. J Urol. 1992;148:939–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)36782-4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Dancz CE, Ozel B. Is there a pelvic organ prolapse threshold that predicts bladder outflow obstruction? Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22:863–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-011-1373-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Chang TC, Hsiao SM, Chen CH, Wu WY, Lin HH. Utilizing preoperative 20-minute pad testing with vaginal gauze packing for indicating concomitant midurethral sling during cystocele repair. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014;172:127–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.10.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Ploeg JM, Rengerink KO, Steen A, Leeuwen JH, Vaart CH, Roovers JP. Vaginal prolapse repair with or without a midurethral sling in women with genital prolapse and occult stress urinary incontinence: a randomized trial. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27:1029–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2924-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Crescenze IM, Abraham N, Li J, Goldman HB, Vasavada S. Urgency incontinence before and after revision of a synthetic mid urethral sling. J Urol. 2016;196:478–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.01.091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Uebersax JS, Wyman JF, Shumaker SA, McClish DK, Fantl JA. Short forms to assess life quality and symptom distress for urinary incontinence in women: the incontinence impact questionnaire and the urogenital distress inventory. Continence program for women research group. Neurourol Urodyn. 1995;14:131–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.1930140206.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Shoureshi PS, Lee W, Kobashi KC, Sajadi KP. Media coverage of the 2019 United States Food and Drug Administration ordered withdrawal of vaginal mesh products for pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2021;32:375–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04401-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

H.O.D. Santos: project conceptualization and development, data extraction/analysis, data curation, visualization, manuscript writing/editing; D.B. Lourenço: project conceptualization and development, data extraction/analysis, data curation, visualization, manuscript writing/editing; A.D. Partezani: data extraction/analysis and manuscript editing; S.B. Teles: data extraction/analysis and manuscript editing; B. Bianco: resources, manuscript review and editing; L.A.S. Rios: visualization, manuscript review and editing; G.C. Lemos: resources, supervision, manuscript review, and editing; A. Carneiro: project conceptualization, supervision and administration, resources, manuscript writing/editing. All authors critically reviewed the manuscript and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arie Carneiro.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations

Supplementary information

Supplementary Fig. 1

UDI-6 questionnaire scores before and after surgery for correction of pelvic organ prolapse with or without sling placement (PNG 156 kb)

High resolution image (TIFF 209 kb)

Supplementary Table 1

(DOCX 30 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lourenço, D.B., Duarte-Santos, H.O., Partezani, A.D. et al. Urodynamic profile of voiding in patients with pelvic organ prolapse after surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J 34, 53–65 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05086-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05086-9

Keywords

Navigation