Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Resident simulation training improves operative time of the retropubic midurethral sling procedure for stress incontinence

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Our aim was to assess whether immediate preoperative resident simulation training decreases operative time and improves resident proficiency when performing a retropubic midurethral sling (MUS) procedure.

Methods

This prospective cohort study took place over 8 months at the Icahn School of Medicine, New York, USA. During the first 4 months, all retropubic MUS procedures were performed by residents who underwent immediate preoperative simulation training. The cases completed during the following 4 months were performed by residents who had not received preoperative simulation training. During the 8-month period, residents completed self-assessment questionnaires upon completion of the surgery and attendings evaluated the residents using the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) global rating scale. Operative time between the two periods were compared using two-sample Student’s t test. Comparative analysis between groups was performed based on the OSATS scores using the Wilcoxon rank-sum nonparametric test.

Results

There were 22 cases in the simulation group (SG) and 20 in the no simulation group (NSG). SG mean operative time was 12.6 min and NSG mean operative time was 14.6 min (p = 0.12). The SG mean OSATS score was 30.4 versus NSG of 27.8 (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that preoperative simulation significantly improves operative performance of the retropubic MUS procedure among residents and also improves their confidence in the operating room. There was a decrease in mean operative time of 2 min in the SG, but the difference was not statistically significant. This data is consistent in demonstrating improved surgical performance and resident confidence with simulation training.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sutherland LM, Middleton PF, Anthony A, Hamdorf J, Cregan P, Scott D, Maddern GJ. Surgical simulation a systematic review. Ann Surg. 2006;243(3).

  2. Scalese R, Obeso V, Issenberg B. Simulation technology in medical education. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23:46–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. McCluney AL, Vassiliou MC, Kaneva PA, Cao J, Stanbridge DD, Feldman LS, et al. FLS simulator performance predicts intraoperative laparoscopic skill. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:1991–199.

  4. Gala R, Oregjuela F, Gerten K, Lockrow E, Kilpatrick C, Chonan L, et al. Effect of validated skills simulation on operating room performance in obstetrics and gynecolgoy residents; a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gyencol. 2013;121(93):578–84.

  5. Banks E, Pardanani S, King M, Chudnoff S, Damus K, Freda MC. A surgical skills laboratory improves residents’ knowledge and performance of episiotomy repair. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195:1463–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Banks EH, Chudnoff S, Karmin I, Wang C, Pardanani S. Does surgical simulator improve resident operative performance on laparascopic tubal ligation? Am J of Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197:541e1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chudnoff SG, Liu CS, Levie MD, Bernestein P, Banks EH. Efficacy of a novel educational curriculum using a simulation laboratory on resident performance on hysteroscopic sterilization. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(4):1521–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Schimpf et al. Sling Surgery for Stress Urinary Incontinence in women; a systematic review and metaanalysis. 2014.

  9. McLennan MT, Melick CF. Bladder perforation during tension-free vaginal tape procedures: analysis of learning curve and risk factors. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106(5 Pt 1):1000–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Niitsu H, Hirabayashi N, Yoshimitsu M, Mimura T, Taomoto J, Sugiyama Y, et al. Using the objective structured assessment of technical skills (OSATS) global rating scale to evaluate the skills of surgical trainees in the operating room. Surg Today. 2013;43(3):271–5.

  11. Sorosky J, Anderson B. Surgical experiences and training of residents: perspective of experienced gynecologic oncologists. Gynecol Oncol. 1999;75:222–223.

  12. Patel NR, Makai GE, Sloan NL, Della Badia CR. Traditional versus simulation resident surgical laparoscopic salpingectomy training: a randomized controlled trial. JMIG. 2016.

  13. Coleman RL, Muller CY. Effects of a laboratory-based skills curriculum on laparoscopic proficiency: a randomized trial. Am J Obset Gynecol. 2002;186(4):836–42.

  14. Martin JA, Regehr G, Reznick R, MacRae H, Murnaghan J, Hutchison C, et al. Objective structured Assesssment of technical skills (OSATS) for surgical residents. Br J Surg. 1997;84(2):273–8.

  15. Hilton P, Rose K. The “learning curve” for retropubic mid-urethral sling procedures: a retrospective cohort study. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27:565–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles Ascher-Walsh.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rosen, L., Jacobson, N., Weinberg, A. et al. Resident simulation training improves operative time of the retropubic midurethral sling procedure for stress incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 30, 1359–1363 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3744-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3744-x

Keywords

Navigation