Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Long-term outcomes of the Ajust® Adjustable Single-Incision Sling for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and overall safety of the Ajust® Adjustable Single-Incision Sling in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence.

Methods

This was a prospective, multicenter study conducted in women diagnosed with stress urinary incontinence. The Ajust® Sling was implanted and patients were followed postoperatively for up to 29 months. Evaluations were performed to assess postoperative rate of continence, complications, and patient quality of life (QOL).

Results

From November 2008 through May 2009, 52 patients were enrolled and underwent a procedure to implant the Ajust® Sling. Overall, 86.3 % of the patients who successfully received the Ajust® Sling demonstrated total restoration or improvement of continence at the last study visit. QOL scores related to global bladder feeling and lifestyle improved. Only one patient reported the occurrence of mild pain which resolved without treatment or sequelae.

Conclusions

In long-term follow-up, the Ajust® Sling was safe and effective, restoring or improving continence in 86.3 % of patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

Ajust® Sling:

Ajust® Adjustable Single-Incision Sling

BMI:

Body mass index

CST:

Cough stress test

PGI-I:

Patient Global Impression of Improvement

PPIUS:

Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale

PVR:

Post-void residual

QOL:

Quality of life

SUI:

Stress urinary incontinence

TVT:

Tension-free vaginal tape

UUI:

Urgency urinary incontinence

VAS:

Visual analogue scale

References

  1. Luber KM (2004) The definition, prevalence, and risk factors for stress urinary incontinence. Rev Urol 6(Suppl 3):S3–S9

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ulmsten U, Henriksson L, Johnson P, Varhos G (1996) An ambulatory surgical procedure under local anesthesia for treatment of female urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 7(2):81–85, discussion 85-6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Nilsson CG, Palva K, Rezapour M, Falconer C (2008) Eleven years prospective follow-up of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure for treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19(8):1043–1047, Epub 2008 Jun 6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Barber MD, Kleeman S, Karram MM, Paraiso MF, Walters MD, Vasavada S, Ellerkmann M (2008) Transobturator tape compared with tension-free vaginal tape for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 111(3):611–621

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Delorme E (2001) Transobturator urethral suspension: mini-invasive procedure in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women. Prog Urol 11(6):1306–1313

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ross S, Robert M, Swaby C, Dederer L, Lier D, Tang S, Brasher P, Birch C, Cenaiko D, Mainprize T, Murphy M, Carlson K, Baverstock R, Jacobs P, Williamson T (2009) Transobturator tape compared with tension-free vaginal tape for stress incontinence: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 114(6):1287–1294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang W, Zhu L, Lang J (2009) Transobturator tape procedure versus tension-free vaginal tape for treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 104(2):113–116, Epub 2008 Oct 28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Schierlitz L, Dwyer PL, Rosamilia A, Murray C, Thomas E, De Souza A, Lim YN, Hiscock R (2008) Effectiveness of tension-free vaginal tape compared with transobturator tape in women with stress urinary incontinence and intrinsic sphincter deficiency: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 112(6):1253–1261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Latthe PM, Foon R, Toozs-Hobson P (2007) Transobturator and retropubic tape procedures in stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis of effectiveness and complications. BJOG 114(5):522–531, Epub 2007 Mar 16

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Latthe PM, Singh P, Foon R, Toozs-Hobson P (2010) Two routes of transobturator tape procedures in stress urinary incontinence: a meta-analysis with direct and indirect comparison of randomized trials. BJU Int 106(1):68–76, Epub 2009 Nov 12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Oliveira R, Botelho F, Silva P, Resende A, Silva C, Dinis P, Cruz F (2011) Exploratory study assessing efficacy and complications of TVT-O, TVT-Secur, and Mini-Arc: results at 12-month follow-up. Eur Urol 59(6):940–944, Epub 2011 Jan 21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Resende A, Oliveira R, Botelho F, Silva C, Dinis P, Cruz F (2011) Mid-term follow-up of a randomized trial comparing TVT-O™, TVT-Secur™ and Mini-Arc™. 26th Annual Congress of the European Association of Urology; March 18-22, 2011 Vienna, Abstract

  13. Ingelman-Sundberg A (1952) Urinary incontinence in woman, excluding fistulas. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 31:266–291

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Haylen BT, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Cosson M, Davila GW, Deprest J, Dwyer PL, Fatton B, Kocjancic E, Lee J, Maher C, Rizk DE, Petri E, Sand PK, Schaer GN, Webb R, Standardization and Terminology Committees of IUGA and ICS, Joint IUGA/ICS Working Group on Complications Terminology (2011) An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint terminology and classification of the complications related directly to the insertion of prosthesis (meshes, implants, tapes) and grafts in female pelvic floor surgery. Neurourol Urodyn 30(1):2–12, simultaneously published in Int Urogynecol J 2011 22(1):3–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cartwright R, Panayi D, Cardozo L, Khullar V (2010) Reliability and normal ranges for the Patient’s Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale in asymptomatic women. BJU Int 105(6):832–836, Epub 2009 Oct 10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yalcin I, Bump RC (2003) Validation of two global impression questionnaires for incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189(1):98–101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Meschia M, Barbacini P, Baccichet R, Buonaguidi A, Maffiolini M, Ricci L, Braghin C, Brusati V, Dell’Utri C, Spreafico L (2011) Short-term outcomes with the Ajust™ system: a new single incision sling for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 22(2):177–182, Epub 2010 Aug 27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Abdel-Fattah M, Agur W, Abdel-All M, Guerrero K, Allam M, Mackintosh A, Mostafa A, Yousef M (2012) Prospective multi-centre study of adjustable single-incision mini-sling (Ajust(®)) in the management of stress urinary incontinence in women: 1-year follow-up study. BJU Int 109:880–886. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10471.x, Epub ahead of print

  19. Mostafa A, Agur W, Abdel-All M, Guerrero K, Allam M, Lim C, Yousef M, Abdel-Fattah M (2011) A multicentre randomised trial of single-incision mini-sling (Ajust©) and tension-free vaginal tape-obturator (TVT-OTM) in management of female stress urinary incontinence. ICS Meeting 2011, Neurourol Urodyn Vol 30(6); Abstract 4

  20. Cornu J, Ciofu C, Sebe P, Peyrat L, Haab F (2011) Cure of women stress urinary incontinence with the Ajust single-incision sling: one year results. ICS Meeting 2011, Neurourol Urodyn Vol 30(6); Abstract 868

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kennelly M, Moore R, Siegel S, Pringle S, Presthus J, Nguyen J, Lukban J, Van Drie D, De Ridder D, Pommerville P, Snyder J (2011) Two years prospective evaluation of the MiniArc® single-incision sling for treatment of stress urinary incontinence. J Urol 185(4S) abstract 1335

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jeffery S, Acharyya R, Algar M, Makhene M, Makhene M (2010) Mini-sling procedures in stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review of efficacy and complications. ICS/IUGA meeting 2010. Neurourol Urodyn 29(6):811–812

    Google Scholar 

  23. Abdel-Fattah M, Ford J, Lim CP, Madhuvrata P (2011) A systematic review and meta-analysis of single-incision mini-slings versus standard midurethral slings in surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence. ICS Meeting 2011, Neurourol Urodyn Vol 30(6); Abstract 1

  24. Kaelin-Gambirasio I, Jacob S, Boulvain M et al (2009) Complications associated with transobturator sling procedures: analysis of 233 consecutive cases with a 27 months follow-up. BMC Womens Health 9:28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ogah J, Cody JD, Rogerson L (2009) Minimally invasive synthetic suburethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD006375

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Abdel-Fattah M, Ramsay I, Pringle S (2006) Lower urinary tract injuries after transobturator tape insertion by different routes: a large retrospective study. BJOG 113:1377–1381

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Tamussino K, Hanzal E, Kölle D et al (2007) Transobturator tapes for stress urinary incontinence: results of the Austrian registry. Am J Obstet Gynecol 197:634.e1–634.e5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Morey AF, Medendorp AR, Noller MW et al (2006) Transobturator versus transabdominal mid urethral slings: a multi-institutional comparison of obstructive voiding complications. J Urol 175:1014–1017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Laurikainen E, Valpas A, Kivelä A et al (2007) Retropubic compared with transobturator tape placement in treatment of urinary incontinence: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 109:4–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Cadish LA, Hacker MR, Dodge LE et al (2010) Association of body mass index with hip and thigh pain following transobturator midurethral sling placement. Am J Obstet Gynecol 203:508.e1–508.e5

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all of the patients as well as the secretarial, nursing, and medical staff of the participating hospitals and the gynecologists and urologists for their cooperation. Special thanks to Vincent Lucente, Allentown PA, for his help in introduction of this method.

Funding

None received from C. R. Bard.

Conflicts of interest

G. Naumann, T. Hagemeier and S. Zachmann have received honoraria from C.R. Bard for lectures.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gert Naumann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Naumann, G., Hagemeier, T., Zachmann, S. et al. Long-term outcomes of the Ajust® Adjustable Single-Incision Sling for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 24, 231–239 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1843-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1843-7

Keywords

Navigation