Skip to main content

Can pelvic floor injury secondary to delivery be prevented?

International Urogynecology Journal volume 23, pages 165–173 (2012)Cite this article

Abstract

The number of women suffering from pelvic floor disorders (PFD) is likely to grow significantly in the coming years with a growing older population. There is an urgent need to investigate factors contributing to the development of PFD and develop preventative strategies. We have reviewed the literature and analyzed results from our own study regarding the association between delivery mode, obstetrical practice and fetal measurements, and damage to the pelvic floor. Based on our findings, we have suggested a flowchart helping the obstetrician to conduct vaginal delivery with minimal pelvic floor insult. Primiparity, instrumental delivery, large fetal head circumference, and prolonged second stage of delivery are risk factors for PFD. Pelvic floor integrity should always be seriously considered in every primiparous woman. All efforts should be aimed at minimizing any insult, which might have a significant impact on the woman’s pelvic integrity and future quality of life.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. Lukacz ES et al (2006) Parity, mode of delivery, and pelvic floor disorders. Obstet Gynecol 107(6):1253–1260

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Varma MG et al (2006) Fecal incontinence in females older than aged 40 years: who is at risk? Dis Colon Rectum 49(6):841–851

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Boreham MK et al (2005) Anal incontinence in women presenting for gynecologic care: prevalence, risk factors, and impact upon quality of life. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192(5):1637–1642

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fultz NH et al (2003) Burden of stress urinary incontinence for community-dwelling women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189(5):1275–1282

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Olsen AL et al (1997) Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 89(4):501–506

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sultan AH et al (1993) Anal-sphincter disruption during vaginal delivery. N Engl J Med 329(26):1905–1911

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sultan AH et al (1994) Third degree obstetric anal sphincter tears: risk factors and outcome of primary repair. BMJ 308(6933):887–891

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hendrix SL et al (2002) Pelvic organ prolapse in the Women's Health Initiative: gravity and gravidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 186(6):1160–1166

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Handa VL et al (2004) Progression and remission of pelvic organ prolapse: a longitudinal study of menopausal women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 190(1):27–32

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rortveit G et al (2001) Age- and type-dependent effects of parity on urinary incontinence: the Norwegian EPINCONT study. Obstet Gynecol 98(6):1004–1010

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Abramov Y et al (2005) Risk factors for female anal incontinence: new insight through the Evanston–Northwestern Twin Sisters Study. Obstet Gynecol 106(4):726–732

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Goldberg RP et al (2005) Delivery mode is a major environmental determinant of stress urinary incontinence: results of the Evanston–Northwestern Twin Sisters Study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193(6):2149–2153

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Subak LL et al (2001) Cost of pelvic organ prolapse surgery in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 98(4):646–651

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Carley ME et al (1999) Obstetric history in women with surgically corrected adult urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 6(1):85–89

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Moalli PA et al (2003) Risk factors associated with pelvic floor disorders in women undergoing surgical repair. Obstet Gynecol 101(5 Pt 1):869–874

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chiaffarino F et al (1999) Reproductive factors, family history, occupation and risk of urogenital prolapse. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 82(1):63–67

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rinne KM, Kirkinen PP (1999) What predisposes young women to genital prolapse? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 84(1):23–25

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. MacLennan AH et al (2000) The prevalence of pelvic floor disorders and their relationship to gender, age, parity and mode of delivery. BJOG 107(12):1460–1470

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. O'Boyle AL et al (2002) Pelvic organ support in nulliparous pregnant and nonpregnant women: a case control study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 187(1):99–102

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Grodstein F et al (2003) Association of age, race, and obstetric history with urinary symptoms among women in the Nurses' Health Study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189(2):428–434

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nygaard I (2006) Urinary incontinence: is cesarean delivery protective? Semin Perinatol 30(5):267–271

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rortveit G et al (2007) Symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse: prevalence and risk factors in a population-based, racially diverse cohort. Obstet Gynecol 109(6):1396–1403

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Leijonhufvud A et al (2011) Risks of stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse surgery in relation to mode of childbirth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 204(1):70.e1–70.e7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Viktrup L, Lose G (2001) The risk of stress incontinence 5 years after first delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185(1):82–87

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Boyles SH et al (2009) Effect of mode of delivery on the incidence of urinary incontinence in primiparous women. Obstet Gynecol 113(1):134–141

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Burgio KL et al (2003) Urinary incontinence in the 12-month postpartum period. Obstet Gynecol 102(6):1291–1298

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Thorp JM Jr et al (1999) Urinary incontinence in pregnancy and the puerperium: a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 181(2):266–273

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. van Brummen HJ et al (2006) How do the prevalences of urogenital symptoms change during pregnancy? Neurourol Urodyn 25(2):135–139

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. van Brummen HJ et al (2006) Bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms 1 year after first delivery: prevalence and the effect of childbirth. BJU Int 98(1):89–95

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Mason L et al (1999) The prevalence of stress incontinence during pregnancy and following delivery. Midwifery 15(2):120–128

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Viktrup L, Lose G (2000) Lower urinary tract symptoms 5 years after the first delivery. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 11(6):336–340

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Foldspang A et al (2004) Risk of postpartum urinary incontinence associated with pregnancy and mode of delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 83(10):923–927

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Farrell SA, Allen VM, Baskett TF (2001) Parturition and urinary incontinence in primiparas. Obstet Gynecol 97(3):350–356

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Stainton MC, Strahle A, Fethney J (2005) Leaking urine prior to pregnancy: a risk factor for postnatal incontinence. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 45(4):295–299

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Dolan LM, Hilton P (2010) Obstetric risk factors and pelvic floor dysfunction 20 years after first delivery. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 21(5):535–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Bump RC, Norton PA (1998) Epidemiology and natural history of pelvic floor dysfunction. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 25(4):723–746

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Hornemann Aea (2010) Advanced age is a risk factor for higher grade perineal lacerations during delivery in nulliparous women. Arch Gynecol Obstet 281:59–64

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Rortveit G, Hunskaar S (2006) Urinary incontinence and age at the first and last delivery: the Norwegian HUNT/EPINCONT study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 195(2):433–438

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Handa V (2010) Pelvic floor disorders associated with pregnancy and childbirth. UpToDate. Available at http://www.uptodate.com/contents/pelvic-floor-disorders-associated-with-pregnancy-and-childbirth

  40. Bick DE et al (2006) PErineal Assessment and Repair Longitudinal Study (PEARLS): protocol for a matched pair cluster trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 10:10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Sultan AH (1999) Obstetrical perineal injury and anal incontinence. Clinical Risk 5:193–196

    Google Scholar 

  42. Hannestad YS et al (2004) Familial risk of urinary incontinence in women: population based cross sectional study. BMJ 329(7471):889–891

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Twiss C, Triaca V, Rodriguez LV (2007) Familial transmission of urogenital prolapse and incontinence. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 19(5):464–468

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Jack GS et al (2006) Familial transmission of genitovaginal prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 17(5):498–501

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Christianson LM et al (2003) Risk factors for perineal injury during delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189(1):255–260

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Fenner DE et al (2008) Establishing the prevalence of incontinence study: racial differences in women's patterns of urinary incontinence. J Urol 179(4):1455–1460

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Bump RC (1993) Racial comparisons and contrasts in urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 81(3):421–425

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Woodman PJ et al (2006) Prevalence of severe pelvic organ prolapse in relation to job description and socioeconomic status: a multicenter cross-sectional study. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 17(4):340–345

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Groutz Aea (2007) First vaginal delivery at an older age: does it carry an extra risk for the development of stress urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 26:779–782

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Wilson PD, Herbison RM, Herbison GP (1996) Obstetric practice and the prevalence of urinary incontinence three months after delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 103(2):154–161

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Bump RC et al (1992) Obesity and lower urinary tract function in women: effect of surgically induced weight loss. Am J Obstet Gynecol 167(2):392–397, discussion 397–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Altman D et al (2006) Risk of urinary incontinence after childbirth: a 10-year prospective cohort study. Obstet Gynecol 108(4):873–878

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. DeLancey JO (2005) The hidden epidemic of pelvic floor dysfunction: achievable goals for improved prevention and treatment. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192(5):1488–1495

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. de Leeuw JW et al (2001) Risk factors for third degree perineal ruptures during delivery. BJOG 108(4):383–387

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. DiPiazza D et al (2006) Risk factors for anal sphincter tear in multiparas. Obstet Gynecol 107(6):1233–1237

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Combs CA, Robertson PA, Laros RK Jr (1990) Risk factors for third-degree and fourth-degree perineal lacerations in forceps and vacuum deliveries. Am J Obstet Gynecol 163(1 Pt 1):100–104

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Fischer SR (1979) Factors associated with the occurrence of perineal lacerations. J Nurse Midwifery 24(1):18–26

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Eason E et al (2000) Preventing perineal trauma during childbirth: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 95(3):464–471

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Eskandar O, Shet D (2009) Risk factors for 3rd and 4th degree perineal tear. J Obstet Gynaecol 29(2):119–122

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Sleep J et al (1984) West Berkshire perineal management trial. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 289(6445):587–590

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Dudding TC, Vaizey CJ, Kamm MA (2008) Obstetric anal sphincter injury: incidence, risk factors, and management. Ann Surg 247(2):224–237

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Kudish B et al (2006) Operative vaginal delivery and midline episiotomy: a bad combination for the perineum. Am J Obstet Gynecol 195(3):749–754

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. (1993) Routine vs selective episiotomy: a randomised controlled trial. Argentine Episiotomy Trial Collaborative Group. Lancet 342(8886–8887):1517–1518

  64. Hudelist G et al (2005) Factors predicting severe perineal trauma during childbirth: role of forceps delivery routinely combined with mediolateral episiotomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192(3):875–881

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Cheng YW, Hopkins LM, Caughey AB (2004) How long is too long: Does a prolonged second stage of labor in nulliparous women affect maternal and neonatal outcomes? Am J Obstet Gynecol 191(3):933–938

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Ophir Kea (2003) Uterine rupture: risk factors and pregnancy outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189(4):1042–1046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Williams A et al (2005) Risk scoring system for prediction of obstetric anal sphincter injury. BJOG 112(8):1066–1069

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Valsky DV et al (2009) Fetal head circumference and length of second stage of labor are risk factors for levator ani muscle injury, diagnosed by 3-dimensional transperineal ultrasound in primiparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 201(1):91.e1–91.e7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Dumoulin C (2006) Postnatal pelvic floor muscle training for preventing and treating urinary incontinence: where do we stand? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 18(5):538–543

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Beckmann MM, Garrett AJ (2006) Antenatal perineal massage for reducing perineal trauma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (1):CD005123

  71. Wheeler TL 2nd, Richter HE (2007) Delivery method, anal sphincter tears and fecal incontinence: new information on a persistent problem. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 19(5):474–479

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Borello-France D et al (2006) Fecal and urinary incontinence in primiparous women. Obstet Gynecol 108(4):863–872

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Press JZ et al (2007) Does cesarean section reduce postpartum urinary incontinence? A systematic review. Birth 34(3):228–237

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Al-Mufti R, McCarthy A, Fisk NM (1996) Obstetricians' personal choice and mode of delivery. Lancet 347(9000):544

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Shek KL, Dietz HP (2011) Can levator avulsion be predicted antenatally? Am J Obstet Gynecol 202(6):586.e1–586.e6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Ruckhaberle E (2009) Prospective randomised multicentre trial with the birth trainer EPI-NO for the prevention of perineal trauma. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 49(5):478–483

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. ACOG (2008) Committee opinion no. 395 surgery and patient choice. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Washington

  78. National Institutes of Health state-of-the-science conference statement (2006) Cesarean delivery on maternal request March 27–29, 2006. Obstet Gynecol 107(6):1386–1397

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah Mount Scopus, Jerusalem, Israel

    Yuval Lavy, Chava I. Kaniel & Drorith Hochner-Celnikier

  2. Division of Urogynecology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA

    Peter K. Sand

  3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah Hospital, Mount Scopus, Jerusalem, Israel

    Yuval Lavy

Authors
  1. Yuval Lavy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Peter K. Sand
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chava I. Kaniel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Drorith Hochner-Celnikier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuval Lavy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lavy, Y., Sand, P.K., Kaniel, C.I. et al. Can pelvic floor injury secondary to delivery be prevented?. Int Urogynecol J 23, 165–173 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-011-1530-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-011-1530-0

Keywords

  • Pelvic floor damage
  • Mode of delivery