Skip to main content
Log in

Fecal Incontinence in Females Older Than Aged 40 Years: Who is at Risk?

  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Purpose

This study was designed to estimate the prevalence of, and identify risk factors associated with, fecal incontinence in racially diverse females older than aged 40 years.

Methods

The Reproductive Risks for Incontinence Study at Kaiser is a population-based study of 2,109 randomly selected middle-aged and older females (average age, 56 years). Fecal incontinence, determined by self-report, was categorized by frequency. Females reported the level of bother of fecal incontinence and their general quality of life. Potential risk factors were assessed by self-report, interview, physical examination, and record review. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine the independent association between selected risk factors and the primary outcome of any reported fecal incontinence in the past year.

Results

Fecal incontinence in the past year was reported by 24 percent of females (3.4 percent monthly, 1.9 percent weekly, and 0.2 percent daily). Greater frequency of fecal incontinence was associated with decreased quality of life (Medical Outcome Short Form-36 Mental Component Scale score, P = 0.01), and increased bother (P < 0.001) with 45 percent of females with fecal incontinence in the past year and 100 percent of females with daily fecal incontinence reporting moderate or great bother. In multivariate analysis, the prevalence of fecal incontinence in the past year increased significantly [odds ratio per 5 kg/m2 (95 percent confidence interval)] with obesity [1.2 (1.1–1.3)], chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [1.9 (1.3–2.9)], irritable bowel syndrome [2.4 (1.7–3.4)], urinary incontinence [2.1 (1.7–2.6)], and colectomy [1.9 (1.1–3.1)]. Latina females were less likely to report fecal incontinence than white females [0.6 (0.4–0.9)].

Conclusions

Fecal incontinence, a common problem for females, is associated with substantial adverse affects on quality of life. Several of the identified risk factors are preventable or modifiable, and may direct future research in fecal incontinence therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R Nelson N Norton E Cautley S Furner (1995) ArticleTitleCommunity-based prevalence of anal incontinence JAMA 274 559–561 Occurrence Handle7629985 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqA2MnjsVM%3D Occurrence Handle10.1001/jama.274.7.559

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. N Nakanishi K Tatara F Shinsho et al. (1999) ArticleTitleMortality in relation to urinary and faecal incontinence in elderly people living at home Age Ageing 28 301–306 Occurrence Handle10475868 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1MzhsVylug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1093/ageing/28.3.301

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. DA Drossman Z Li E Andruzzi et al. (1993) ArticleTitleU.S. householder survey of functional gastrointestinal disorders. Prevalence, sociodemography, and health impact Dig Dis Sci 38 1569–1580 Occurrence Handle8359066 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyA28rjtlY%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF01303162

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. MK Boreham HE Richter KS Kenton et al. (2005) ArticleTitleAnal incontinence in women presenting for gynecologic care: prevalence, risk factors, and impact upon quality of life Am J Obstet Gynecol 192 1637–1642 Occurrence Handle15902170 Occurrence Handle10.1016/j.ajog.2004.11.030

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. DL Faltin MR Sangalli F Curtin A Morabia A Weil (2001) ArticleTitlePrevalence of anal incontinence and other anorectal symptoms in women Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 12 117–120 Occurrence Handle11374509 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3ptFymsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/PL00004031

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. D Gordon A Groutz G Goldman et al. (1999) ArticleTitleAnal incontinence: prevalence among female patients attending a urogynecologic clinic Neurourol Urodyn 18 199–204 Occurrence Handle10338440 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M3mvVOlsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1002/(SICI)1520-6777(1999)18:3<199::AID-NAU6>3.0.CO;2-U

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. JF Johanson J Lafferty (1996) ArticleTitleEpidemiology of fecal incontinence: the silent affliction Am J Gastroenterol 91 33–36 Occurrence Handle8561140 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymC2crislw%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. GW Tobin JC Brocklehurst (1986) ArticleTitleFaecal incontinence in residential homes for the elderly: prevalence, aetiology and management Age Ageing 15 41–46 Occurrence Handle3953330 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BimC2MrhsFw%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. R Nelson S Furner V Jesudason (1998) ArticleTitleFecal incontinence in Wisconsin nursing homes: prevalence and associations Dis Colon Rectum 41 1226–1229 Occurrence Handle9788384 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2Fgt1CgsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02258218

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. PS Goode KL Burgio AD Halli et al. (2005) ArticleTitlePrevalence and correlates of fecal incontinence in community-dwelling older adults J Am Geriatr Soc 53 629–635 Occurrence Handle15817009 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53211.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. CR Quander MC Morris J Melson JL Bienias DA Evans (2005) ArticleTitlePrevalence of and factors associated with fecal incontinence in a large community study of older individuals Am J Gastroenterol 100 905–909 Occurrence Handle15784039 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.30511.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. RD Madoff SC Parker MG Varma AC Lowry (2004) ArticleTitleFaecal incontinence in adults Lancet 364 621–632 Occurrence Handle15313364 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16856-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. CM Byrne CK Pager J Rex R Roberts MJ Solomon (2002) ArticleTitleAssessment of quality of life in the treatment of patients with neuropathic fecal incontinence Dis Colon Rectum 45 1431–1436 Occurrence Handle12432287 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-6444-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. J Rothbarth WA Bemelman WJ Meijerink et al. (2001) ArticleTitleWhat is the impact of fecal incontinence on quality of life? Dis Colon Rectum 44 67–71 Occurrence Handle11805565 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2FnvVGitA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02234823

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. N Krieger (1992) ArticleTitleOvercoming the absence of socioeconomic data in medical records: validation and application of a census-based methodology Am J Public Health 82 703–710 Occurrence Handle1566949 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By2B3s%2FpslQ%3D Occurrence Handle10.2105/AJPH.82.5.703

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. DH Thom SK Eeden ParticleVan Den AI Ragins et al. (2006) ArticleTitleDifferences in prevalence of urinary incontinence by race/ethnicity J Urol 175 259–264 Occurrence Handle16406923 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00039-X

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. JE Ware SuffixJr CD Sherbourne (1992) ArticleTitleThe MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection Med Care 30 473–483 Occurrence Handle1593914

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. P McCullagh JA Nelder (1989) Generalized linear models Chapman & Hall New York

    Google Scholar 

  19. IE Nygaard SS Rao JD Dawson (1997) ArticleTitleAnal incontinence after anal sphincter disruption: a 30-year retrospective cohort study Obstet Gynecol 89 896–901 Occurrence Handle9170461 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiA3MvhtF0%3D Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00119-1

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. E Uustal Fornell G Wingren P Kjolhede (2004) ArticleTitleFactors associated with pelvic floor dysfunction with emphasis on urinary and fecal incontinence and genital prolapse: an epidemiological study Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 83 383–389 Occurrence Handle15005787 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.0001-6349.2004.00367.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. J Lysy E Israeli E Goldin (1999) ArticleTitleThe prevalence of chronic diarrhea among diabetic patients Am J Gastroenterol 94 2165–2170 Occurrence Handle10445544 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1Mznt1OitA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.01289.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. RL Nelson (2004) ArticleTitleEpidemiology of fecal incontinence (1Suppl1) Gastroenterology 126 S3–S7 Occurrence Handle14978632 Occurrence Handle10.1053/j.gastro.2003.10.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. P Bytzer NJ Talley M Leemon LJ Young MP Jones M Horowitz (2001) ArticleTitlePrevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms associated with diabetes mellitus: a population-based survey of 15,000 adults Arch Intern Med 161 1989–1996 Occurrence Handle11525701 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mrit1ylsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1001/archinte.161.16.1989

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. M Guilera A Balboa F Mearin (2005) ArticleTitleBowel habit subtypes and temporal patterns in irritable bowel syndrome: systematic review Am J Gastroenterol 100 1174–1184 Occurrence Handle15842596 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.40674.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. GH Sauter AC Moussavian G Meyer HO Steitz KG Parhofer D Jungst (2002) ArticleTitleBowel habits and bile acid malabsorption in the months after cholecystectomy Am J Gastroenterol 97 1732–1735 Occurrence Handle12135027 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05779.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. YH Ho D Low HS Goh (1996) ArticleTitleBowel function survey after segmental colorectal resections Dis Colon Rectum 39 307–310 Occurrence Handle8603553 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymC1cvkvVc%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02049473

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. AH MacLennan AW Taylor DH Wilson D Wilson (2000) ArticleTitleTheprevalence of pelvic floor disorders and their relationship to gender, age, parity and mode of delivery Br J Obstet Gynaecol 107 1460–1470 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7ks1ensA%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. G Lacima M Pera (2003) ArticleTitleCombined fecal and urinary incontinence: an update Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 15 405–410 Occurrence Handle14501244

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. D Grady JS Brown E Vittinghoff W Applegate E Varner T Snyder (2001) ArticleTitlePostmenopausal hormones and incontinence: the Heart and Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study Obstet Gynecol 97 116–120 Occurrence Handle11152919 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXitlyjug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0029-7844(00)01115-7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. SL Hendrix BB Cochrane IE Nygaard et al. (2005) ArticleTitleEffects of estrogen with and without progestin on urinary incontinence JAMA 293 935–948 Occurrence Handle15728164 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXhsFCgt7Y%3D Occurrence Handle10.1001/jama.293.8.935

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. S Jackson M James P Abrams (2002) ArticleTitleThe effect of oestradiol on vaginal collagen metabolism in postmenopausal women with genuine stress incontinence Br J Obstet Gynaecol 109 339–344 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XjtFGqtLw%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. D Robinson RO Rainer SA Washburn TB Clarkson (1996) ArticleTitleEffects of estrogen and progestin replacement on the urogenital tract of the ovariectomized cynomolgus monkey Neurourol Urodyn 15 215–221 Occurrence Handle8732988 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK28XjtlemsbY%3D Occurrence Handle10.1002/(SICI)1520-6777(1996)15:3<215::AID-NAU6>3.0.CO;2-I

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. A Russo R Botten MF Kong et al. (2004) ArticleTitleEffects of acute hyperglycaemia on anorectal motor and sensory function in diabetes mellitus Diabet Med 21 176–182 Occurrence Handle14984454 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD2c%2Fps1Ggsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1464-5491.2004.01106.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. EE Soffer T Hull (2000) ArticleTitleFecal incontinence: a practical approach to evaluation and treatment Am J Gastroenterol 95 1873–1880 Occurrence Handle10950029 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvhs1aluw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.02237.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. TH Rockwood JM Church JW Fleshman et al. (2000) ArticleTitleFecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale: quality of life instrument for patients with fecal incontinence Dis Colon Rectum 43 9–17 Occurrence Handle10813117 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3ntFahtw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02237236

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Madhulika G. Varma M.D..

Additional information

The Reproductive Risk of Incontinence Study in Kaiser (RRISK) was funded by the National Institutes of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Grant # R01-DK53335.

Reprints are not available.

About this article

Cite this article

Varma, M.G., Brown, J.S., Creasman, J.M. et al. Fecal Incontinence in Females Older Than Aged 40 Years: Who is at Risk?. Dis Colon Rectum 49, 841–851 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-006-0535-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-006-0535-0

Key words

Navigation