Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Rectal erosion of synthetic mesh used in posterior colporrhaphy requiring surgical removal

  • Case Report
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Treatment of pelvic organ prolapse with transvaginally placed synthetic mesh has recently increased. Several reports of complications have surfaced raising the overall question of safety regarding its use for vaginal prolapse repair. This case report describes a rectal erosion and dyspareunia that resulted from mesh placed into the posterior vaginal wall. A 47-year-old woman underwent a laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy and a posterior repair with polypropylene mesh resulting in a rectal erosion. Despite removal of all of the mesh that could be excised rectally resulting in a healed rectal mucosa, the patient had persistent dyspareunia and pain requiring complete removal of the mesh using a vaginal approach. After surgery, the patient had resolution of all her symptoms. Further studies of transvaginally placed synthetic mesh need to be performed to determine its safety and efficacy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Olson AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL (1997) Epidemiology of surgically managed prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 89:501–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hilger WS, Cornella JL (2005) Rectovaginal fistula after posterior intravaginal slingplasty and polypropylene mesh augmented rectocele repair. Int Urogynecol J 17:89–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dwyer PL, O’Reilly BA (2004) Transvaginal repair of anterior and posterior compartment prolapse with Atrium polypropylene mesh. BJOG 111:831–836

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Achtari C, Hiscock R, O’Reilly BA, Schierlitz L, Dwyer PL (2005) Risk factors for mesh erosion after transvaginal surgery using polypropylene/polyglactin 910 (Vypro II) mesh. Int Urogynecol J 16:389–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. US Food and Drug Administration. Center for Devices and Radiological Health website. http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/. Accessed February, 2007

  6. Maher C, Baessler K (2006) Surgical management of anterior vaginal wall prolapse: an evidence based literature review. Int Urogynecol J 17:195–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Maher C, Baessler K (2005) Surgical management of posterior vaginal wall prolapse: an evidence-based literature review. Int Urogynecol J 17:84–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Paraiso MFR, Barber MD, Muir TW, Walters MD (2006) Rectocele repair: a randomized trial of three surgical techniques including graft augmentation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 195:1762–1771

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Milani R, Salvatore S, Soligo M, Pifarotti P, Meschia M, Cortese M (2005) Functional and anatomical outcome of anterior and posterior vaginal prolapse repair with prolene mesh. BJOG 112:107–111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Huebner M, Hsu Y, Fenner DE (2006) The use of graft materials in vaginal and pelvic floor surgery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 92:279–288

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric A Hurtado.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hurtado, E.A., Bailey, H.R. & Reeves, K.O. Rectal erosion of synthetic mesh used in posterior colporrhaphy requiring surgical removal. Int Urogynecol J 18, 1499–1501 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-007-0403-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-007-0403-z

Keywords

Navigation