Abstract
The purpose of the study was to evaluate practice patterns of members of the American Urogynecologic Society (AUGS) with respect to female sexual dysfunction (FSD). A brief self-administered survey of 20 questions was mailed to 966 physician members of the AUGS in the United States of America and Canada; 471 surveys were returned (49% response rate). The majority of responders see urogynecology (19%) or urogynecology and general gynecology patients (43%). Sixty-eight percent of physicians were familiar with questionnaires to assess FSD; however, only 13% said they use these for screening purposes. Most said they believed screening for FSD was somewhat (47%) or very important (42%). Despite having these beliefs, only 22% of the responding physicians stated they always screen for FSD, while 55% do so most of the time and 23% admitted they never or rarely screen. Similar results were obtained regarding screening following urogynecologic surgery. Several barriers to screening for FSD existed, the most common being lack of time. The majority of respondents (69%) underestimated the prevalence of FSD in their patient population. Finally, although more than half of responders had received post-residency training in urogynecology (59%), 50% of them stated the training with respect to FSD was unsatisfactory, while only 10% were satisfied. Overall, many urogynecologists do not consistently screen for FSD, underestimate its prevalence, and feel they received unsatisfactory training.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Basson R, Berman J, Burnett A, Derogatis L, Ferguson D, Fourcroy J et al (2000) Report of the international consensus development conference on female sexual dysfunction: definitions and classifications. J Urol 163:888–893
Laumann EO, Paik A, Rosen RC (1999) Sexual dysfunction in the United States; prevalence and predictors. JAMA 281:537–544
Mercer CH, Fenton KA, Johnson AM, Wellings K, Macdowall W, McManus S et al (2003) Sexual function problems and help seeking behavior in Britain: national probability sample survey. BMJ 327:426–427
Nazareth I, Boynton P, King M (2003) Problems with sexual function in people attending London general practitioners: cross sectional study. BMJ 327:423–426
Geiss IM, Umek WH, Dungl A, Sam C, Riss P, Hanzal E (2003) Prevalence of female sexual dysfunction in gynecologic and urogynecologic patients according to the international consensus classification. Urology 62:514–518
Berman L, Berman J, Felder S, Pollets D, Chhabra S, Miles M et al (2003) Seeking help for sexual function complaints: what gynecologists need to know about the female patient’s experience. Fertil Steril 79:572–576
Rhodes JC, Kjerulff KH, Langenberg PW, Guzinski GM (1999) Hysterectomy and sexual functioning. JAMA 282:1934–1941
Farrell AS, Kieser K (2000) Sexuality after hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 95:1045–1051
Weber AM, Walters MD, Piedmonte MR (2000) Sexual function and vaginal anatomy in women before and after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 182:1610–1615
Vassallo BJ, Karram MM (2003) Management of iatrogenic vaginal constriction. Obstet Gynecol 101:512–520
Haboubi NH, Lincoln N (2003) Views of health professionals on discussing sexual issues with patients. Disabil Rehabil 25:291–296
Gott M, Hinchliff S, Galena E (2004) General practitioner attitudes to discussing sexual health issues with older people. Soc Sci Med 58:2093–2103
Drane JE (1991) Imputing nonresponses to mail-back questionnaires. Am J Epidemiol 134:908–912
Acknowledgments
This research was supported in part by the Hatton Research Department, Good Samaritan Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio. These results were presented as a poster at the American Urogynecologic Society and the Society of Gynecologic Surgeons Joint Scientific meeting, July 2004, San Diego, California.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pauls, R.N., Kleeman, S.D., Segal, J.L. et al. Practice patterns of physician members of the American Urogynecologic Society regarding female sexual dysfunction: results of a national survey. Int Urogynecol J 16, 460–467 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-005-1286-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-005-1286-5