Abstract
In this article, we introduce the global stakeholder capitalism model of digital platforms. We describe the role that big data plays in the formation of the new extended innovation ecosystems of digital platforms and explain how these extended innovation ecosystems give rise to this new model. We discuss the implications of this new model for the strategy of digital platforms from a Schumpeterian perspective and show how digital platforms profit from innovation by capturing a form of rents that differs from standard Schumpeterian rents rooted in innovation economics. We conclude that the sustainability of this model depends on a new form of governance that assumes multi-fiduciary corporate duties in the extended innovation ecosystems of digital platforms.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The authors confirm that all the data sources supporting the findings of this study are referenced in this article and were publicly available at the time of submission.
Notes
Named after David Sarnoff, a pioneer of broadcasting networks in the U.S.
According to this law, the economic value of the network could grow to the square of the number of nodes (users) if all users in the network are equally valuable in terms of enabling interconnections (Briscoe et al. 2006).
Which in the case of the initial business model of Amazon corresponded to books.
According to which the economic value generated by these applications grows exponentially with the number of nodes (users) in the network (Reed 2001).
These cases, which are by far more common due to the myriad of ways in which big data can be monetized and the deep uncertainty associated with developing the necessary assets for such monetization, are best exemplified by the “Moonshots” and “Other Bets” entrepreneurial agendas driven as part of the new grand strategy of Google (Manjoo 2015),
The complete list is available at https://acquiredby.co/twitter-acquisitions.
Facebook seems to have learned this lesson the hard way as a result of the Cambridge Analytica scandal (see www.nytimes.com/2019/09/20/technology/facebook-data-privacy-suspension.html).
Such as Google’s cutting-edge AI technologies and the sheer amount of big data harvested by Google’s search engine marketing business.
A comprehensive report on the new grand strategy of Google can be accessed at: https://www.cbinsights.com/research/report/google-strategy-teardown/.
The rise of the online ad syndication market pioneered by Google at the turn of the millennium provided an early case of a digital platform harnessing the power of exponential network effects in group-forming networks to ignite a period of hyper growth. In the case of Google, this period gave rise to the search engine marketing industry as we know it today.
The most ambitious case of innovation ecosystem extension is the new grand strategy of Google under Alphabet (Manjoo 2015).
The acquisition of Instagram by Facebook is an example of this type of acquisitions.
The sudden rise in price of property rentals in the case of Airbnb is an example of unanticipated externalities arising in the extended innovation ecosystem of digital platforms.
The case of Twitter analyzed in Section 3 is a prototypical example of such integration process (https://www.vox.com/2015/4/11/11561360/twitter-cutting-ties-with-all-data-resellers-including-datasift).
These are valuable, rare, inimitable and nonsubstitutable resources.
See for example https://www.vox.com/2015/4/11/11561360/twitter-cutting-ties-with-all-data-resellers-including-datasift).
A recent example of these complex trade-offs is the current debate on how digital platforms should regulate fake news without limiting free speech.
Which corresponds to cell 5 in the original diagram 11 introduced in Teece (1986, p. 297).
This process is best exemplified by Twitter in its quest for a viable revenue model (Welch and Popper 2015).
As exemplified by Twitter’s governance of its innovation ecosystem (Ingram 2011).
An early case of this threat was delivered by YouTube as a highly successful application that piggybacked on MySpace (Rosenbush 2006).
That is, the different number and type of roles a stakeholder as an agent can play in these extended ecosystems.
The catch-up strategy executed by Google to position Android as the most widely used mobile operating system brilliantly exemplifies such coopeting strategies.
This is shown in Fig. 1 by the relationships of digital platforms with governments at various levels, including cities, provinces, nation-states, regions across nation-states, and governance bodies at supranational level (Lessig 2006). A prototypical case of this form of negotiation are the agreements between Airbnb and cities in Europe, in which bespoke taxation preempting the installation of norms banning Airbnb’s short rentals from large metropolitan areas was negotiated to preserve the business model of Airbnb (Nieuwland and van Malik 2020).
References
Anderson C (2006) The long tail: why the future of business is selling less of more. Hyperion, New York (NY), USA
Arango T (2011) Hot social networking site cools as Facebook grows. The New York Times, January, https://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/12/technology/internet/12myspace.html
Arthur C (2012) Digital wars: Apple, Google, Microsoft and the battle for the Internet. Kogan Page, London, Philadelphia
Barney J (1991) Firms resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17:99–120
Benghozi P, Benhamou F (2010) The long tail: Myth or reality? Int J Arts Manag 12:43–53
Benner K (2016) New Orleans becomes new model for airbnb to work with cities. The New York Times, December, https://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/07/technology/new-orleans-airbnb-model.html
Bowie N (1998) A Kantian theory of capitalism. Bus Ethics Q 8:37–60
Briscoe B, Odlyzko A, Tilly B (2006) Metcalfe’s Law is wrong. IEEE Spectrum, November, https://spectrum.ieee.org/computing/networks/metcalfes--law--is--wrong
Brynjolfsson E, McAffee A (2017) What’s Driving the Machine Learning Explosion? Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2017/07/whats-driving-the-machine-learning-explosion
Cadwalladr C, Graham-Harrison E (2018) Revealed: 50 million Facebook profiles harvested for Cambridge Analytica in major data breach. The Guardian, March, https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/mar/17/cambridge-analytica-facebook-influence-us-election
Cain G (2020) Samsung vs. Apple: Inside the brutal war for smartphone dominance. Forbes, March, https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesdigitalcovers/2020/03/13/samsung-vs-apple-inside-the-brutal-war-for-smartphone-dominance/#3f00eec64142
Castilla E, Hwang H, Granovetter E, Granovetter M (2000) Social networks in Silicon Valley. In: Lee C-M, Miller WF, Hancock MG, Rowen HS (eds) The Silicon Valley edge. Stanford University Press, Stanford (CA), pp 218–247
Chesbrough H (2003) Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA
Conger K, Dance G, Isaac M (2019) Facebooks suspension of tens of thousands of apps reveals wider privacy issues. The New York, September, https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/20/technology/facebook-data-privacy-suspension.html
Courtright M (2019) The case against Twitter. Envision Creative, February, https://www.envision-creative.com/blog/twitter-decline-inevitable/
Cusumano M, Gawer A, Yoffie D (2019) The business of platforms: Strategy in the age of digital competition, innovation, and power. Harper Collins, New York (NY), USA
D’Aveni R (1994) Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. Free Press, New York (US)
D’Aveni R (2010) Hypercompetition. Simon and Schuster
D’Aveni R, Dagnino G, Smith K (2010) The age of temporary advantage. Strategic Management Journal 31:1371-1385
Devlin K (1999) Infosense: Turning information into knowledge. Freeman Publishers, New York, USA, W.H
Eisenhardt K, Martin J (2000) Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strat Manag J 21:1105–1121
Eisenmann T, Parket G, van Alstyne M (2007) Platform envelopment. Harvard Business School, Working Paper 07-104, Cambridge (MA), USA
Ferrary M, Granovetter M (2009) The role of venture capital firms in Silicon Valley’s complex innovation network. Economy and Society 38:326–359
Fishburn PC (1973) The theory of social choice. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey
Freeman R (1984) Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman, Boston, MA
Freeman R, Martin K, Parmar B (2007) Stakeholder capitalism. Journal of Business Ethics 74:303–314
Friedman M (1962) Capitalism and freedom. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL
Gawer A (2014) Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework. Research Policy 43:1239–1249
Gawer A, Cusumano M (2002) Platform leadership: How intel, microsoft, and Cisco drive industry innovation. Harvard Business School Press, Boston
Gawer A, Cusumano M (2014) Industry platforms and ecosystem innovation. Journal of Product Innnovation Management 31:417–433
Golsorkhi D, Rouleau L, Seidl D, Vaara E (2015) Introduction: What is strategy as practice? In: Golsorkhi D, Rouleau L, Seidl D, Vaara E (eds) Cambridge handbook of strategy as practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 1–30
Granovetter M (1985) Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology 19:481–510
Granovetter M (2005) The impact of social structures on economic outcomes. Journal of Economic Perspectives 19:33–50
Hanusch H, Pyka A (2007) Applying a comprehensive Neo-Schumpeterian approach to Europe and its Lisbon Agenda. In: Tilly R, Welfens P, Heise M (eds) 50 Years of EU Economic Dynamics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, pp 275–299
Hendler J, Golbeck J (2008) Metcalfe’s law, Web 2.0, and the semantic web. Journal of Web Semantics 6:14–20
Hinz O, Eckert J, Skiera B (2011) Drivers of the long tail phenomenon: An empirical analysis. J Manag Inf Syst 27:43–70
Hseih N (2004) The obligations of TNCs: Rawlsian justice and the duty of assistance. Bus Ethics Q 14:643–661
Ingram M (2011) Why Twitter should think twice about bulldozing the ecosystem. Gigaom, March, https://gigaom.com/2011/03/12/why-twitter-should-think-twice-about-bulldozing-the-ecosystem/
Jacobs H (2015) Former MySpace CEO explains why Facebook was able to dominate social media despite coming second. Business Insider, May, https://www.businessinsider.com/former-myspace-ceo-explains-why-facebook-was-able-to-dominate-social-media-despite-coming-second-2015-5
Kahn L (2018) Amazon’s antitrust antagonist has a breakthrough idea. The New York Times, September, https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/07/technology/monopoly-antitrust-lina-khan-amazon.html
Kay J, King M (2020) Radical uncertainty: Decision-making beyond the numbers. W.W. Norton & Company, New York (NY), USA
Lessig L (2006) Code: And Other Laws of Cyberspace, Version 2.0. Basic Books, New York (NY), USA
Lunden I (2015) Nick Halstead, founder of big data analytics firm DataSift, steps down as CEO. TechCrunch, October, https://techcrunch.com/2015/10/23/nick-halstead-founder-of-big-data-analytics-firm-datasift-steps-down-as-ceo/
Manjoo F (2015) With Google as Alphabet, a bid to dream big beyond search. The New York Times, August, https://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/11/technology/giving-google-room-to-dream-big-beyond-search.html?_r=0
McLean I, Urken A (1995) Classics of social choice. The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor
Morgan B (2015) Twitter to bring data business in-house. Research Live, April, https://www.research-live.com/article/news/twitter-to-bring-data-business-inhouse/id/4013172
Nieuwland S, van Malik R (2020) Regulating Airbnb: how cities deal with perceived negative externalities of short-term rentals. Current Issues in Tourism 23:811–825
Nolan P (2008) Capitalism and freedom: The contradictory character of globalization. Anthem, London
Normann R (2001) Reframing business: When the map changes the landscape. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (UK)
Olson P (2018) Exclusive: WhatsApp cofounder Brian Acton gives the inside story on #deletefacebook and why he left $850 million behind. Forbes, September, https://www.forbes.com/sites/parmyolson/2018/09/26/exclusive-whatsapp-cofounder-brian-acton-gives-the-inside-story-on-deletefacebook-and-why-he-left-850-million-behind/#1cebb52b3f20
O’Reilly T (2007) What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. University Library of Munich, Germany, MPRA Paper 65
Parker G, van Alstyne M, Choudary S (2016) Platform revolution: How networked markets are transforming the economy - and how to make them work for you. Norton & Company, New York (NY), USA
Penrose E (1995) The theory of the growth of the firm, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK
Porter M (2008) The five competitive forces that shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, January, https://hbr.org/2008/01/the-five-competitive-forces-that-shape-strategy
Powell W, Koput K, Owen-Smith J (2005) Network dynamics and field evolution: The growth of inter-organizational collaboration in the life sciences. Am J Sociol 110:1132–1205
Ramírez R, Wilkinson A (2016) Strategic reframing: the Oxford scenario planning approach. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK
Reed D (2001) The law of the pack. Harvard Business Review, February, https://hbr.org/2001/02/the-law-of-the-pack
Rosenbush S (2006) YouTube vs. MySpace? With millions of dollars in online ad revenue on the line, the two Net superstars could be headed for more conflict. Bloomberg, October, https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2006-10-15/youtube-vs-dot-myspace
Schumpeter JA (1911) The theory of economic development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (MA)
Singer A (2013) Corporate political activity, social responsibility, and competitive strategy: An integrative model. Business Ethics: A European Review 22:308–324
Spulber D (2019) The economics of markets and platforms. J Econ Manag Strateg 28(Special Issue on Platforms):159–172
Teece D (1986) Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy 15:285–305
Teece D (2006) Reflections on profiting from innovation. Research Policy 35:1131–1146
Teece D (2014) The foundations of enterprise performance: dynamic and ordinary capabilities in an (economic) theory of firms. Academy of Management Perspectives 28:328–352
Teece D (2007) Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strat Manag J 28:1319–1350
Teece D (2018) Profiting from innovation in the digital economy: Enabling technologies, standards, and licensing models in the wireless world. Research Policy 47:1367–1387
Teece D (2018) Reply to Nelson, Helfat and Raubitschek. Research Policy 47:1400–1402
van Alstyne M, Parker G, Choudary S (2016) Pipelines, platforms, and the new rules of strategy. Harvard Business Review, April, https://hbr.org/2016/04/pipelines-platforms-and-the-new-rules-of-strategy
Ward M (2018) The future of Google. Better Marketing, February, https://medium.com/better-marketing/the-big-4-part-2-the-future-of-google-a469483533e9
Welch C, Popper B (2015) Twitter reaches 300 million active users, but the stock crashes after earnings leak early. The Verge, April, https://www.theverge.com/2015/4/28/8509855/twitter-earnings-q1-2015-leak-selerity
Weller K, Bruns A, Burgess J, Mahrt M, Puschmann C (2014) Twitter and society. Peter Lang, New York, Washington, D.C., Baltimore, Bern, Frankfurt, Berlin, Brussels, Vienna, Oxford
Wingfield N, Stelter B (2011) How Netflix lost 800,000 members, and good will. The New York Times, October, https://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/25/technology/netflix-lost-800000-members-with-price-rise-and-split-plan.html
Yoffie D, Gawer A, Cusumano M (2019) A study of more than 250 platforms reveals why most fail. Harvard Business Review, May, https://hbr.org/2019/05/a-study-of-more-than-250-platforms-reveals-why-most-fail
Zenger T (2015) Why Google became Alphabet. Harvard Business Review, August, https://hbr.org/2015/08/why-google-became-alphabet
Acknowledgements
The authors owe a debt of gratitude to the anonymous reviewers whose comments and suggestions greatly improved earlier versions of this article.
Funding
The European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration funded this work under grant 321480.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Paredes-Frigolett, H., Pyka, A. The global stakeholder capitalism model of digital platforms and its implications for strategy and innovation from a Schumpeterian perspective. J Evol Econ 32, 463–500 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-022-00760-z
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-022-00760-z