Skip to main content
Log in

Acting as an innovation niche seeder:how can the reverse salient of southeast Asian economies be overcome?

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Journal of Evolutionary Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Taking Southeast Asian emerging economies as an empirical case, this study explores how the reverse salients that have emerged during the transitional process may be overcome efficiently and effectively. In particular, three action-oriented case studies derived from a heuristic research approach are presented to show how Taiwan is empowering its universities and public research institutes to act as innovation niche seeders for Southeast Asian economies, thereby compensating for the weakness of their socio-technical systems (i.e. the reverse salients). Presently, the government-led policies of Southeast Asian countries are largely oriented towards incentivizing foreign multinational corporations to lead the development of domestic production networks. This strategy allows these countries to acquire the necessary resources for an economic transition in the era of digitalization, although at the expense of developing their own innovation niches. This study presents the urgency of a need for a new approach, and a new avenue for emerging countries to develop an effective and efficient governance model. The proposed model would allow external institutional mechanisms, such as universities and public research institutes, to act as critical intermediaries providing an alternative solution for the dilemmas faced by small and medium-sized enterprise-centric emerging countries. Policy implications for building sustainable socio-technical regimes in Southeast Asia’s transitional emerging countries are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. It was Hughes (1987) who first proposed the concept of a ‘reverse salient.’ In his book explaining the evolution of a large technological system, he refers to a ‘reverse salient’ as components in the system that have fallen behind, or out of phase with, the others. He further explains that a reverse salient impedes the evolution or hampers the achievement toward the final goal of the collective system. In this study, we follow Hughes’s metaphor for describing a reverse salient as a significant difficulty faced during system transition.

  2. While there are some successful startups that are being developed in SEA economies, for example Wongnai in Thailand (an app startup providing restaurant search service) and Go-Jek in Indonesia, it is important to note that these startups are imitating business models generated from advanced Western countries then adapting them into the local context.

References

  • ASEAN Secretariat and UNCTAD (2016) ASEAN investment report 2016: foreign direct investment and MSME linkages. http://asean.org/storage/2016/09/ASEAN-Investment-Report-2016.pdf. Accessed 29 April 2018

  • ASEAN Secretariat and UNCTAD (2017) ASEAN investment report 2017: foreign direct investment and economic zones in ASEAN. http://asean.org/storage/2017/11/ASEAN-Investment-Report-2017.pdf. Accessed 9 April 2018

  • Asian Development Bank (2017) ADB annual report 2016. https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/institutional-document/414776/adb-annual-report-2016.pdf. Accessed 28 May 2019

  • Bai X, Wieczorek AJ, Kaneko S, Lisson S, Contreras A (2009) Enabling sustainability transitions in Asia: the importance of vertical and horizontal linkages. Technol Forecast Soc Change 76:255–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkhout F, Angel D, Wieczorek AJ (2009) Asian development pathways and sustainable socio-technical regimes. Technol Forecast Soc Change 76:218–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury-Huang H (2010) What is good action research? Why the resurgent interest? Action Res 8:93–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Brydon-Miller M, Greenwood D, Maguire P (2003) Why action research? Action Res 1:9–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Castellacci F (2009) The interactions between national systems and sectoral patterns of innovation. J Evol Econ 19(3):321–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Chulavachana TJ (2014) Thai government targets “smart Thailand 2020” combined “national ICT” & “National Broadband” policies. Thai Intel Economics News. https://entrepreneurthai.wordpress.com/2014/03/10/thailands-government-combined-national-ict-policy-national-broadband-policy-for-smart-thailand-2020/. Accessed 9 April 2018

  • Coughlan P, Coghlan D (2002) Action research for operations management. Int J Oper Prod Manag 22:220–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning JH (1994) Multinational enterprises and the globalization of innovatory capacity. Res Policy 23:67–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Felker GB (2003) Southeast Asian industrialisation and the changing global production system. Third World Q 24(2):255–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu X, Gong Y (2011) Indigenous and foreign innovation efforts and drivers of technological upgrading: evidence from China. World Dev 39(7):1213–1225

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu X, Pietrobelli C, Soete L (2011) The role of foreign technology and indigenous innovation in the emerging economies: technological change and catching-up. World Dev 39(7):1204–1212

    Google Scholar 

  • Geels FW (2002) Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Res Policy 31(8–9):1257–1274

    Google Scholar 

  • Geels FW (2004) From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Res Policy 33:897–920

    Google Scholar 

  • Geels FW (2005) Processes and patterns in transitions and system innovations: refining the co-evolutionary multi-level perspective. Technol Forecast Soc Change 72(6):681–696

    Google Scholar 

  • German L, Stroud A (2007) A framework for the integration of diverse learning approaches: operationalizing agricultural research and development (R&D) linkages in eastern Africa. World Dev 35(5):792–814

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez ET (2009) The rise and fall of capital: corporate Malaysia in historical perspective. J Contemp Asia 39(3):345–381

    Google Scholar 

  • Govindaraju VC, Wong C-Y (2011) Patenting activities by developing countries: the case of Malaysia. World Pat Inf 33(1):51–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Grillitsch M, Hansen T, Coenen L, Miörner J, Moodysson J (2019) Innovation policy for system-wide transformation: the case of strategic innovation programmes (SIPs) in Sweden. Res Policy 48(4):1048–1061

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobday M (2001) The electronics industries of the Asia–pacific: exploiting international production networks for economic development. Asian-Pac Econ Lit 15(1):13–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu M-C, Hung S-C (2014) Taiwan's pharmaceuticals: a failure of the sectoral system of innovation? Technol Forecast Soc Change 88:162–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu M-C, Mathews JA (2005) National innovative capacity in East Asia. Res Policy 34(9):1322–1349

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes TP (1987) The evolution of large technological systems. In: Bijker WE, Hughes TP, Pinch TJ (eds) The social construction of technological systems. The MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 51–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Hung S-C, Whittington R (2011) Agency in national innovation systems: institutional entrepreneurship and the professionalization of Taiwanese IT. Res Policy 40(4):526–538

    Google Scholar 

  • International Data Corporation (2014) Worldwide and regional Internet of Things (IoT) 2014–2020 Forecast: a virtuous circle of proven value and demand. http://branden.biz/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/IoT-worldwide_regional_2014-2020-forecast.pdf. Accessed 27 Jan 2017

  • Kern F (2012) Using the multi-level perspective on socio-technical transitions to assess innovation policy. Technol Forecast Soc Change 79(2):298–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim Y-Z, Lee K (2008) Sectoral innovation system and a technological catch-up: the case of the capital goods industry in Korea. Glob Econ Rev 37(2):135–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Lall S (1992) Technological capabilities and industrialization. World Dev 20(2):165–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee K, Lim C (2001) Technological regimes, catching-up and leapfrogging: findings from the Korean industries. Res Policy 30(3):459–483

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee K, Szapiro M, Mao Z (2017) From global value chains (GVC) to innovation systems for local value chains and knowledge creation. Eur J Dev Res 30(3):424–441

    Google Scholar 

  • Malerba F (2004) Sectoral systems of innovation: concepts, issues and analyses of six major sectors in Europe. Cambridge University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews JA (2006) Dragon multinationals: new players in 21 st century globalization. Asia Pac J Manag 23(1):5–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews JA, Hu M-C (2007) Enhancing the role of universities in building national innovative capacity in Asia: the case of Taiwan. World Dev 35(6):1005–1020

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews JA, Hu M-C, Wu C-Y (2011) Fast-follower industrial dynamics: the case of Taiwan’s emergent solar photovoltaic industry. Ind Innov 18(2):177–202

    Google Scholar 

  • MIMOS Berhad (2015) National Internet of things (IoT) strategic roadmap: a summary. http://www.mimos.my/iot/National_IoT_Strategic_Roadmap_Summary.pdf. Accessed 15 Jan 2018

  • Nelson RR (ed) (1993) National innovation systems: a comparative analysis. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Nykvist B, Whitmarsh L (2008) A multi-level analysis of sustainable mobility transitions: niche development in the UK and Sweden. Technol Forecast Soc Change 75(9):1373–1387

    Google Scholar 

  • Pietrobelli C, Rabellotti R (2011) Global value chains meet innovation systems: are there learning opportunities for developing countries? World Dev 39(7):1261–1269

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason P, Bradbury H (eds) (2001) Handbook of action research: participative inquiry and practice. Sage Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Rock M, Murphy JT, Rasiah R, van Seters P, Managi S (2009) A hard slog, not a leap frog: globalization and sustainability transitions in developing Asia. Technol Forecast Soc Change 76(2):241–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg DI (ed) (2010) Korea's changing roles in Southeast Asia: expanding influence and relations. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • Talavera C (2017) World’s biggest ‘smart city’ to rise in Philippines. The Philippine Star. https://www.philstar.com/business/real-estate/2017/07/06/1717043/worlds-biggest-smart-city-rise-philippines. Accessed 15 Jan 2018

  • Teubal M (2002) What is the systems perspective to innovation and technology policy (ITP) and how can we apply it to developing and newly industrialized economies? J Evol Econ 12(1–2):233–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Van H (2016) IoT has major potential in Vietnam. Vietnam Economic Times. http://vneconomictimes.com/article/vietnam-today/iot-has-major-potential-in-vietnam. Accessed 8 Jan 2018

  • Verbong G, Geels FW, Raven R (2008) Multi-niche analysis of dynamics and policies in Dutch renewable energy innovation journeys (1970–2006): hype-cycles, closed networks and technology-focused learning. Technol Anal Strateg Manag 20(5):555–573

    Google Scholar 

  • Viotti EB (2002) National learning systems: a new approach on technological change in late industrializing economies and evidences from the cases of Brazil and South Korea. Technol Forecast Soc Change 69(7):653–680

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber KM, Rohracher H (2012) Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change: combining insights from innovation systems and multi-level perspective in a comprehensive ‘failures’ framework. Res Policy 41(6):1037–1047

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong C-Y (2011) Rent-seeking, industrial policies and national innovation systems in southeast Asian economies. Technol Soc 33(3–4):231–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong C-Y, Goh K-L (2015) Catch-up models of science and technology: a theorization of the Asian experience from bi-logistic growth trajectories. Technol Forecast Soc Change 95:312–327

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong C-Y, Hu M-C, Shiu J-W (2015) Governing the economic transition: how Taiwan transformed its industrial system to attain virtuous cycle development. Rev Policy Res 32(3):365–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng C, Hu M-C (2008) Challenge to ICT manpower planning under the economic restructuring: empirical evidence from MNCs in Singapore and Taiwan. Technol Forecast Soc Change 75(6):834–853

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ching-Yan Wu.

Ethics declarations

The authors would like to acknowledge that this study was funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (grant number: 106–2420-H-007-008-). The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Highlights

• The article elaborates the urgent need for emerging economies to focus catch-up efforts on building indigenous innovation niches.

• The study identifies and demonstrates how reverse salients can be overcome effectively and efficiently in emerging latecomer countries.

• The authors argue that universities and public research institutes from industrialized latecomer countries, such as Taiwan, are able to help compensate for the weaknesses of the socio-technical systems in emerging economies.

• The article proposes a novel governance model for building sustainable socio-technical regimes in transitional Southeast Asian economies.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lo, HC., Wu, CY. & Hu, MC. Acting as an innovation niche seeder:how can the reverse salient of southeast Asian economies be overcome?. J Evol Econ 30, 1195–1217 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-020-00685-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-020-00685-5

Keywords

JEL codes

Navigation