Abstract
Diurnal tidal oscillations in the coupled atmosphere–ocean system generate important contributions to the Earth’s free core nutation (FCN) and annual and sub-annual components of forced nutation in the celestial pole offsets. The determination of FCN parameters cannot avoid the influence of geophysical fluid excitation neither with the direct analysis of FCN signal (direct approaches) nor with the resonance analysis of forced nutation (resonance approaches). There is a significant difference in the FCN parameters obtained with resonance and direct approaches from celestial pole offsets observed through very long baseline interferometry (VLBI). The source of the difference between the two lacks quantitative analysis, which causes difficulties in interpreting the validity of the derived FCN parameters. Using both approaches, we conducted a simulation of celestial pole offsets to quantitatively demonstrate how geophysical fluid excitation affects the determination of FCN parameters from VLBI observations. Using the same excitation source, the FCN period obtained by the direct approach deviated from the set value (430.21 d) by more than 10 d, while the FCN period obtained by the resonance approach showed no deviation from the set value by more than 1 d. The results indicate that the resonance approach more accurately reflects the intrinsic period of the FCN. The impact of atmospheric and oceanic contributions on the determination of the FCN period with the resonance approach was within 2 d. Numerical simulation shows that discrepancies in FCN parameters caused by geophysical excitation were nonnegligible in constructing accurate FCN models.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability statement
The data will be provided upon reasonable request.
References
Belda S, Ferrandiz JM, Heinkelmann R, Nilsson T, Schuh H (2016) Testing a new free core nutation empirical model. J Geodyn 94:59–67
Bizouard C, Brzeziński A, Petrov S (1998) Diurnal atmospheric forcing and temporal variations of the nutation amplitudes. J Geod 72(10):561–577
Brzeziński A (1994) Polar motion excitation by variations of the effective angular momentum function: II. Ext Model Manusc Geodaet 19:157–171
Brzeziński A (2007) A simple digital filter for the geophysical excitation of nutation. J Geod 81(6–8):543–551
Brzeziński A, Dobslaw H, Thomas M (2014) Atmospheric and oceanic excitation of the free core nutation estimated from recent geophysical models. In: Rizos C, Willis P (eds) Proc. IAG 2011 Scientific Assembly “Earth on the Edge: Science for a Sustainable Planet”, IAG Symposia, vol 139, pp 461–466
Chao B (2017) On rotational normal modes of the Earth: resonance, excitation, convolution, deconvolution and all that. Geod Geodyn 8(6):371–376
Chao B, Hsieh Y (2015) The earths free core nutation: formulation of dynamics and estimation of eigenperiod from the very-long-baseline interferometry data. Earth Planet Sci Lett 36:483–492
Cui X, Sun H, Rosat S, Xu J, Zhou J, Ducarme B (2014) Investigation of the time variability of diurnal tides and resonant FCN period. J Geodyn 79:30–38
Cui X, Sun H, Xu J, Zhou JC, Chen XD (2018) Detection of free core nutation resonance variation in Earth tide from global superconducting gravimeter observations. Earth Planets Space 70:199
Cui X, Sun H, Xu J, Zhou J, Chen X (2020) Relationship between free core nutation and geomagnetic jerks. J Geod 94(4):1–13
Dehant V, Laguerre R, Rekier J, Rivoldini A, Triana SA, Trinh A, Hoolst TV, Zhu P (2017) Understanding the effects of the core on the nutation of the Earth. Geod Geodyn 8(6):389–395
Dobslaw H, Dill R (2018) Predicting Earth orientation changes from global forecasts of atmosphere-hydrosphere dynamics. Adv Space Res 61(4):1047–1054
Dobslaw H, Dill R, Grotzsch A, Brzezinski A, Thomas M (2010) Seasonal polar motion excitation from numerical models of atmosphere, ocean, and continental hydrosphere. J Geophys Res 115:B10406. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009B007127
Ducarme B, Sun H, Xu J (2007) Determination of the free core nutation period from tidal gravity observations of the GGP superconducting gravimeter network. J Geod 81:179–187
Florsch N, Hinderer J (2000) Bayesian estimation of the free core nutation parameters from the analysis of precise tidal gravity data. Phys Earth Planet Inter 117:21–35
Forget G, Campin JM, Heimbach P, Hill CN, Ponte RM, Wunsch C (2015) ECCO version 4: an integrated framework for non-linear inverse modeling and global ocean state estimation. Geosci Model Dev 8(10):3071–3104
Fukumori I, Wang O, Fenty I, Forget G, Heimbach P, Ponte R (2017) ECCO Version 4 Release 3, Technical Report. https://www.ecco-group.org/docs/v4r4_synopsis.pdf
Furuya M, Chao BF (1996) Estimation of period and Q of the Chandler wobble. Geophys J Int 127(3):693–702
Hinderer J, Legros H, Amalvict M (1982) A search for Chandler and nearly diurnal free wobble using Liouville equations. Geophys J R AstrSoc 71:303–332
Koot L, Rivoldini A, Viron OD, Dehant V (2008) Estimation of earth interior parameters from a Bayesian inversion of very long baseline interferometry nutation time series. J Geophys Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JB005409
Koot L, Viron OD (2011) Atmospheric contributions to nutations and implications for the estimation of deep Earth’s properties from nutation observations. Geophys J Int 185(3):1255–1265
Krásná H, Böhm J, Schuh H (2013) Free core nutation observed by VLBI. Astron Astrophys 555(1):A29
Lambert SB, Dehant V (2007) The Earth’s core parameters as seen by the VLBI. Astron Astrophys 469(2):777–781
Lambert S (2007) Empirical model of the Free Core Nutation. Technical note available at http://syrte.obspm.fr/
Liu LT, Hsu H (2012) Inversion and normalization of time-frequency transform. Appl Math Inf Sci 6(1S):67–74
Malkin Z (2007) Empiric models of the Earth’s free core nutation. Solar Syst Res 41(6):492–497
Malkin Z, Terentev D (2007) Parameters of the free core nutation from VLBI data. arXiv preprint physics/0702152
Marquardt D (1963) An algorithm for least-squares estimation of non-linear parameters. J Soc Ind Appl Math 11(2):431–441
Mathews PM, Herring TA, Buffett BA (2002) Modeling of nutation and precession: new nutation series for nonrigid Earth and insights into the Earth’s interior. J Geophys Res 107:539–554
Modiri S, Heinkelmann R, Belda S, Malkin Z, Hoseini M, Korte M, Ferrándiz JM, Schuh H (2021) Towards understanding the interconnection between celestial pole motion and earth’s magnetic field using space geodetic techniques. Sensors 21:7555. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21227555
Neuberg J, Hinderer J, Zurn W (1987) Stacking gravity tide observations in central Europe for the retrieval of the complex eigenfrequency of the nearly diurnal free wobble. Geophy J R Astr Soc 91:853–868
Nurul Huda I, Lambert S, Bizouard C, Ziegler Y (2020) Nutation terms adjustment to VLBI and implication for the Earth rotation resonance parameters. Geophys J Int 220(2):759–767
Petit G, Luzum B (2010) IERS conventions (2010), IERS Tech. Note, 36, Bundesamts für Kartogr. und Geod., Frankfurt, Germany
Ray RD, Boy JP, Arbic BK, Egbert GD, Erofeeva SY, Petrov L, Shriver JF (2021) The problematic psi1 ocean tide. Geophys J Int 217:1181–1192. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggab263
Rekier J, Chao BF, Chen J, Dehant V, Rosat S, Zhu P (2022) Earth’s rotation: observations and relation to deep interior. Surv Geophys 43(1):149–175
Roosbeek F, Defraigne P, Feissel M, Dehant V (1999) The free core nutation period stays between 431 and 434 sidereal days. Geophys Res Lett 26(1):131–134
Rosat S, Lambert SB (2009) Free core nutation resonance parameters from VLBI and superconducting gravimeter data. Astron Astrophys 503:287–291
Sasao T, Wahr JM (1981) An excitation mechanism for the free core nutation. Geophys J R Astron Soc 64:729–746
Schindelegger M, Einspigel D, Salstein D, Boehm J (2016) The global S1 tide in Earth’s nutation. Surv Geophys 37:643–680
Schuh H, Böhm S (2021) Earth rotation. In: Gupta HK (ed) Encyclopedia of solid earth geophysics. encyclopedia of earth sciences series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58631-7_177
Sheppard RJ, Jordan BP, Grant EH (1970) Least squares analysis of complex data with applications to permittivity measurements. J Phys D 3(11):1759
Souchay J, Loysel B, Kinoshita H, Folgueira M (1999) Corrections and new developments in rigid Earth nutation theory, III, Final tables REN-2000 including crossed-nutation and spin-orbit coupling effects. Astron Astrophys Suppl Ser 135:111–131
Su X, Liu L, Houtse H, Wang G (2014) Long-term polar motion prediction using normal time–frequency transform. J Geod 88:145–155
Vondrák J, Ron C (2009) Stability of period and quality factor of free core nutation. Acta Geodyn Geomater 6(3(155)):217–224
Vondrák J, Ron C (2014) Geophysical excitation of nutation–comparison of different models. Acta Geodyn Geomater 11(3):193–200
Vondrák J, Ron C (2015) Earth orientation and its excitations by atmosphere, oceans, and geomagnetic jerks. Serb Astron J 191:59–66
Vondrák J, Weber R, Ron C (2005) Free core nutation: direct observations and resonance effects. Astron Astrophys 444(1):297–303
Xu J, Sun H, Luo S (2002) Study of the Earth’s free core nutation by tidal gravity data recorded with international superconducting gravimeters. Sci China Earth Sci 45(4):337–347
Zhou YH, Salstein DA, Chen JL (2006) Revised atmospheric excitation function series related to Earth’s variable rotation under consideration of surface topography. J Geophys Res-Atmos. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006608
Zhou YH, Zhu Q, Salstein D (2016) Estimation of the free core nutation period by the sliding-window complex least-squares fit method. Adv Sp Res 57(10):2136–2140
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. XDB41000000), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos: 42394114, 42174108, 42192535, 42242015), and the Young Top-notch Talent Cultivation Program of Hubei Province. The Project Supported by the Open Fund of Hubei Luojia Laboratory (No. 220100033). We are very thankful to the IERS and ECCO group for providing the EAMF data. We thank LetPub (https://www.letpub.com) for its linguistic assistance during the preparation of this manuscript. We are very thankful to all reviewers (especially Dr. Michael Schindelegger and Prof.Jose M Ferrandiz) for their remarks and suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
CUI participated in the design of the study, carried out the data analysis, and drafted the manuscript. SUN, HOU and XU participated in the design of the study and the manuscript revision. LI, YANG, GONG and ZHOU participated in the data analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Cui, X., Li, N., Gong, L. et al. Simulation analysis on resonance and direct approaches for determining free core nutation parameters with celestial pole offsets. J Geod 98, 26 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-024-01835-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-024-01835-4