Skip to main content
Log in

Different gravity anomaly, crustal structure, and uplift mechanism of the eastern and western Qinling Orogen revealed by full coverage gravimetry

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Geodesy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Exploring the crustal structure and uplift mechanism of the Qinling Orogen, China, contributes to a better understanding of the expansion of the northeast Tibetan Plateau. We conduct a gravity/GNSS survey comprising 649 stations across the Qinling Orogen. In situ measured gravity anomalies deviate from gravity model values in steep areas like the West Qinling, where the differences exceed 100 mGal, indicating the importance of the in situ measured data. Based on these data, significant divergences of gravity anomaly, crustal density structure, and isostatic flexure mechanisms between the West and East Qinling are found. The average free-air and Bouguer gravity anomalies of the West Qinling (− 20 mGal and − 220 mGal) are notably lower than those of East Qinling (70 mGal and − 160 mGal). According to flexure analysis, the surface, internal, and bottom loading ratios are 0.16, 0.47, and 0.37, respectively, for the West Qinling, while they are 0.08, 0.29, and 0.63 for the East Qinling. Combining the present outcomes with other tectonic and geophysical findings, we determine that for the West Qinling, the uplift is caused by lithospheric-scale vertical coherent deformation, with lower crustal flow being the most prominent factor. The East Qinling is characterized by layered deformation, with its upper, middle, and lower crust being affected by post-collisional extension, continental collision, and upwelling mantle material, respectively. We find that the elastic thickness of the Qinling Orogen is much smaller than those of the South China Block and North China Block, making it a possible channel for the extruded materials from the northeast Tibetan Plateau.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

In situ measured data used in this study are included in Supplemental file for peer review. These data will be uploaded to a gravity specialized repository or our institutional repository if the article is eventually accepted. The SGG-UGM-2 gravity model is available at the ICGEM Web site (http://icgem.gfz-potsdam.de/). The CRUST1.0 model is available at the REM Web site (https://igppweb.ucsd.edu/~gabi/crust1.html).

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Professors Zhen Guo, Yongshun John Chen, Zigen Wei, and Zhiwei Li for providing seismic results. This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41974012), National Natural Science Foundation of China (41974096, 41931074), and State Key Laboratory of Geodesy and Earth’s Dynamics, Innovation Academy for Precision Measurement Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (SKLGED2022-2-5).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

QZ and YW contributed to conceptualization. ZW, GF, and YS contributed to methodology. ZW and YS contributed to software. ZW contributed to formal analysis and writing—original draft. ZW, QZ, YS, YZ, and HY contributed to data acquisition. ZW, QZ, YW, GF, YS, YZ, and HY contributed to writing—review and editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qian Zhao.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 2076 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Z., Zhao, Q., Wu, Y. et al. Different gravity anomaly, crustal structure, and uplift mechanism of the eastern and western Qinling Orogen revealed by full coverage gravimetry. J Geod 97, 22 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-023-01714-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-023-01714-4

Keywords

Navigation