Abstract
The increasing importance of terrestrial gravimetry in monitoring global change processes, in providing a reference for satellite measurements and in applications in metrology necessitates a stable reference system reflecting the measurement accuracy achievable by modern gravimeters. Therefore, over the last decade, the International Association of Geodesy (IAG) has developed a system to achieve accurate, homogeneous, longterm global recording of Earth’s gravity, while taking advantage of the potential of today’s absolute gravity measurements. The current status of the International Gravity Reference System and Frame is presented as worked out by the IAG Joint Working Group 2.1.1 “Establishment of a global absolute gravity reference system” during the period 2015–2019. Here, the system is defined by the instantaneous acceleration of freefall, expressed in the International System of Units (SI) and a set of conventional corrections for the timeindependent components of gravity effects. The frame as the systems realization includes a set of conventional temporal gravity corrections which represent a uniform set of minimum requirements. Measurements with absolute gravimeters, the traceability of which is ensured by comparisons and monitoring at reference stations, provide the basis of the frame. A global set of such stations providing absolute gravity values at the microgal level is the backbone of the frame. Core stations with at least one available space geodetic technique will provide a link to the terrestrial reference frame. Expanded facilities enabling instrumental verification as well as repeated regional and additional comparisons will complement key comparisons at the level of the International Committee for Weights and Measures (CIPM) and ensure a common reference and the traceability to the SI. To make the gravity reference system accessible to any user and to replace the previous IGSN71 network, an infrastructure based on absolute gravity observations needs to be built up. This requires the support of national agencies, which are encouraged to establish compatible first order gravity networks and to provide information about existing absolute gravity observations.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
As delineated by Wilmes et al. (2016), a new gravity reference system needs to be established to overcome the discrepancy between the high accuracy achieved with current absolute gravimeters and the hitherto valid gravity reference system of the International Association of Geodesy (IAG), the International Gravity Standardization Net 1971 (IGSN71) (Morelli et al. 1974). Although it is widely used, at an uncertainty level of \(10^{6}\,\hbox {m s}^{2}\) it fulfills neither the requirements nor the accuracy for the understanding of the Earth’s System and applications in metrology.
Besides several successful prototypes, absolute gravimeters with an uncertainty in the few microgal level (\(1\, \upmu \hbox {Gal} =10^{8}\,\hbox {m} \,\hbox {s}^{2}\)) like FG5 (Niebauer et al. 1995) and FG5–X (Niebauer et al. 2011) are commercially available and widely used today. Field versions (e.g., A10 by Microg LaCoste) allow surveys with an accuracy of 5–10 \(\upmu \hbox {Gal}\) (Falk et al. 2012), and the rapid development of quantum gravimeters (Gillot et al. 2016; Freier et al. 2016) opens up new perspectives and has brought with the Absolute Quantum Gravimeter (AQG) a first model on the market (Ménoret et al. 2018). Such instrumentation guaranteeing a relative accuracy of \(10^{8}\) and better has been demonstrated to be relevant in metrology for the realization of the definition of the kilogram with the Kibble balance (Robinson 2011; Robinson and Schlamminger 2016) and in geosciences to study geodynamics, hydrology and global change in the Earth system (Van Camp et al. 2017).
Following IAG Resolution No. 2 “Establishment of a Global Absolute Gravity Reference System”^{Footnote 1} adopted at the XXVI, General Assembly of the International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG) in Prague 2015, the IAG Joint Working Group 2.1.1 was established to develop a concept for a modern and accurate gravity reference system. A longterm stable gravity reference based on the observations with absolute gravimeters provides the basis to monitor the time variable gravity field as one of the keys to understand the changing Earth and is a foundation to observe crustal deformations and mass transports. Absolute gravity observations at sites colocated to the International Terrestrial Reference Frame (ITRF) (Altamimi et al. 2016) and the International Height Reference Frame (IHRF) (Ihde et al. 2017) in conjunction with consistent standards and conventions will further strengthen gravimetry in the framework of the Global Geodetic Observing System (GGOS) (Plag and Pearlman 2009) as well as the Subcommittee on Geodesy of the United Nations initiative on Global Geospatial Information Management (UNGGIM) and the Global Geodetic Reference Frame (GGRF). The efforts are further in alignment with the key objective of the GGOS Bureau of Products and Standards (BPS) to keep track of and foster homogenization of adopted geodetic standards and conventions across all components of IAG as a fundamental basis for the generation of consistent geometric and gravimetric products (Angermann et al. 2016)
2 Definition of Gravity Reference System and Frame
The definition of the system reflects the fundamental principles and must be stable over time, while the frame as the realization of the system is based on observations with absolute gravimeters and a set of conventional models for their processing (Table 1). Due to its principle, absolute gravity observations at individual stations are not linked to each other eliminating the need to build up classical observation networks. The reliability of all absolute gravimeters used for the realization of the system has to be ensured by comparisons and regular monitoring at reference stations. In contrast to historical gravity reference systems where scale and level had to be controlled and adjusted, only the absolute level needs to be realized today.
In accordance with other geodetic definitions, the acronyms IGRS/IGRF were fixed for the International Gravity Reference System and Frame, respectively.
2.1 International Gravity Reference System
The International Gravity Reference System (IGRS) is defined by the instantaneous acceleration of freefall as the measurand, expressed in the International System of Units (SI). It is completed by a set of references for the timedependent corrections of this quantity comprising constant components: the zerotide system for the tidal correction, the standard atmosphere ISO 2533:1975 (DIN 5450) for the correction for atmospheric gravity effects and the reference pole of the International Earth Rotation and Reference Systems Service (IERS) for the correction for polar motion. These references define the conventional quantity “acceleration of gravity”. Changing these references should be avoided in the future, to guarantee the longterm stability of the system.
2.2 International Gravity Reference Frame
The International Gravity Reference Frame (IGRF) as the realization of the IGRS is represented by absolute gravity measurements traceable to the SI that contain conventional temporal gravity corrections. The IGRF contains a global set of stations where reliable absolute gravity values with a relative accuracy of \(10^{8}\) and better are provided to the users.
Due to the lack of a natural reference for the acceleration of freefall, absolute gravimeters have to be checked at comparisons, where the gravity reference is realized based on a set of measurements by a group of absolute gravimeters and the functional model for their processing.
The series of key comparisons^{Footnote 2} carried out by the Consultative Committee for Mass and Related Quantities (CCM) of the International Committee for Weights and Measures (CIPM) in context of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (MRA) provide the backbone of the IGRF (Wilmes et al. 2016), following the “CCM  IAG Strategy for Metrology in Absolute Gravimetry”^{Footnote 3}, which also describes the traceability chain in gravimetry. Additional comparisons as a component of this strategy are used to distribute the common level further. Besides the key comparison results, the acceptance of all absolute gravimeters participated in comparisons including those not operated by national metrology institutes or their designated laboratories needs to be documented, using the International Absolute Gravity Database AGrav (Wziontek et al. 2012) as registry.
Observations with absolute gravimeters should contain at least the following information tuple:

Observation epoch,

Position of the marker (geodetic latitude, longitude, referred to the ITRF),

Physical height of the marker, including the height system,

Mean absolute gravity value after applying the corrections documented in Sect. 3

The height above the marker where the absolute gravity value is referred to,

Vertical gravity gradient used for transfer of the gravity value along the vertical,
Systematic effects common to a particular type of instrument, e.g., for selfattraction (Niebauer et al. 2012; Pálinkáš et al. 2012; Biolcati et al. 2012; Li et al. 2015b, a), diffraction of the laser beam (van Westrum and Niebauer 2003; Robertsson 2007), verticality (Křen et al. 2018) or signal distortion (Křen et al. 2019) need to be documented and applied.
A set of conventional models as described in Sect. 3 define minimum requirements for the correction of temporal gravity changes covering the Earth tides, ocean tide loading, atmospheric variations and polar motion and the transfer to a reference height.
3 IGRS Conventions 2020
The presented conventions are based on the International Absolute Gravity Basestation Network (IAGBN): Absolute Gravity Observations Data Processing Standards by Boedecker (1988) which are already applied for decades. They are mostly implemented by processing software like the “g” Absolute Gravity Processing Software by Microg LaCoste^{Footnote 4}. Minor updates were necessary to reflect the current state of the art and the compatibility with existing processing results. A further unification of processing standards is subject of the IAG Joint Working Group 2.1.2 “Unified file formats and processing software for highprecision gravimetry”. Where applicable, the basis for the following recommendations is in accordance with the IAG/IUGG resolutions and the IERS Conventions (2010) (Petit and Luzum 2010). Definitions of the IGRS which are not subject to future changes are emphasized. All corrections and reductions should be added to measured quantities.
3.1 Light propagation delay correction
For absolute gravimeters based on classical laser interferometry, each individual time sample should be corrected by
where z(t) is the position of the test mass corresponding to the time t and \(c =299\ 792\ 458 \,\mathrm{m\, s}^{1}\) is the speed of light (IAG 1983 Resolution No. 1). The correction has a negative sign (\(k = 1\)) if the interferometer is positioned above the test mass, and a positive sign (\(k = +1\)) if below (Nagornyi et al. 2011a, b). The latter case is the standard for most of the users.
For absolute gravimeters based on an atom interferometer, the retardation effects caused by the finite speed of light have to be compensated accordingly, e.g., by the measurement scheme.
3.2 Earth tides
The reduction of Earth tides should be based on the development of the tidegenerating potential of Tamura (1987) with 1200 constituents, expanded up to the fourthdegree potential of the Moon and the thirddegree of the Sun. Higher resolution and well recognized developments, like Hartmann and Wenzel (1995) or Kudryavtsev (2004), can also be applied. To account for the response of the Earth due to tidal deformation, parameters (amplitude factors and phase lags) deduced from observations or from a recognized Earth model, preferably Dehant et al. (1999), should be used. The details must be reported as part of the observation document.
The permanent part of the tidegenerating potential can be written as
where \(\varPhi \) is the geocentric latitude, r the radial distance of the observation point and \(r_0\) a scaling factor for distances. With the normalization \(r_0 = 6378136.3\,\hbox {m}\) used in the tidal potential coefficients in Hartmann and Wenzel (1995) which is commonly applied in software for tidal analysis and prediction, the value \(A = 2.9166\,\hbox {m}^{2}\,\hbox {s}^{2}\) in the epoch 2000.0 can be deduced from the IERS Conventions (2010). The tidal developments mentioned in the first paragraph all agree with this value of A within the last digit given. They also include the rate of change in A which is \(0.0009\,\hbox {m}^{2}\,\hbox {s}^{2}\)/century. Any of them can be used to calculate the \(\hbox {M}_{0}\hbox {S}_{0}\) and derived quantities. The correction for the permanent tide is for gravity
where the derivative is taken in the direction of the downward vertical. This is implemented in programs of tidal synthesis. According to IAG Resolution No. 16 of 1983, the indirect effect due to the permanent yielding of the Earth should not be removed, which effectively results in the zerotide system. Therefore, the correction for the permanent tide \(M_0S_0\) must be included with an amplitude factor \(\delta \) of 1.0.
The transformation from meantide gravity to zerotide gravity can also be conveniently performed by writing \(dg(M_0S_0)\) as a function of geodetic latitude \(\varphi \). We then have (Mäkinen 2020)
3.3 Ocean tide loading
Where no local tidal model from observations is available, the effect of ocean tide loading needs to be corrected. The loading effect should in general be calculated based on the model FES2004 (Letellier 2004; Lyard et al. 2006). Other recognized ocean tide models may be used for specific regions, if providing a better correction. It is recommended to obtain the site specific loading parameters (amplitude and phase) from the Ocean Tide Loading Provider^{Footnote 5} (Bos and Scherneck 2013). In order to obtain most precise results, it is strongly suggested to include an interpolation into the complete tidal spectrum using an admittance obtained from the given set of coefficients for the main tidal constituents. This is implemented, e.g., in the program packages SPOTL^{Footnote 6} (Agnew 2012) or ttimm^{Footnote 7}.
3.4 Polar motion
Variations in the geocentric position of the Earth’s rotation axis (polar motion) cause deformation within the Earth due to centrifugal forces. The actual position of the rotational axis is referenced to the IERS pole and described by the pole coordinates (Bizouard et al. 2019). The gravity correction for the solid Earth pole tide is expressed by, e.g., Wahr (1985)
where

x, y pole coordinates in rad

\(\omega = 7\ 292\ 115 \times 10^{11}\,\hbox {rad}\,\hbox {s}^{1}\) mean angular velocity

\(a = 6\ 378\ 136.6\,\hbox {m}\) equatorial radius of the Earth^{Footnote 8}

\(\varphi , \lambda \) geodetic coordinates of the observation point, (longitude positive east of Greenwich).

\(\delta =1.164\) is the amplitude factor for the elastic response of the Earth.
The pole coordinates should be taken from the EOP data as released by IERS^{Footnote 9}. At present, a reduction for angular velocity (length of day) variations is not recommended.
3.5 Atmosphere
The lumped effects of direct gravitation of air mass changes and indirect effect via deformation of the solid Earth have been determined empirically from air pressure variations. It is recommended to reduce these effects through (IAG 1983 Resolution No. 9)
with

\(p_a\) actual observed air pressure

\(p_n\) normal air pressure
The normal air pressure is referred to the ISO 2533:1975 (DIN 5450) Standard Atmosphere
where H is the physical height of the station in meters. The applied value of \(p_n\) needs to be documented for each measurement.
The use of more advanced models, e.g., based on numerical weather models as provided by the EOST Loading Service^{Footnote 10} (Boy et al. 2009) or Atmacs^{Footnote 11} (Klügel and Wziontek 2009), must be documented. It is particularly important to ensure that no constant contributions from these models have an impact to ensure the compatibility with Eq. (6).
3.6 Hydrology
Hydrological phenomena may have a large influence on absolute gravity, and repeated measurements of absolute gravity can in turn be used to study hydrology. However, the magnitude of hydrological corrections on absolute gravity cannot be quantified because an absolute reference for water storage changes is currently not uniquely accessible, e.g., by global models of continental hydrology. Furthermore, the largest impact originates from local water storage changes in the vicinity of the station. The characterization is complex and highly site dependent and requires extensive supplemental in situ instrumentation (Creutzfeldt et al. 2008, 2010). Largescale water storage changes are also significant and reach up to several \(10^{8}\,{\mathrm{m}\,\mathrm{s}^{2}}\), in terms of both Newtonian attraction and the deformation due to surface loading (Boy and Hinderer 2006) but their quantification depends strongly on the choice of the global hydrology model (Creutzfeldt et al. 2010). Due to a missing normal reference, its complexity and uncertainty, corrections for local or largescale water storage changes are currently not recommended to be applied to gravity values submitted to the IGRF.
3.7 Absolute gravity height reference
The results of absolute gravity measurements are presented usually at a specific height above the station marker that mainly depends on the gravimeter type. The absolute gravity value should be referred to the effective position on the freefall trajectory (Pálinkáš et al. 2012). At this position, the gravity value is invariant under changes of the constant vertical gravity gradient (VGG) used in the observation equation of cornercube gravimeters (Niebauer et al. 1995). Hence, the evaluation of absolute gravity measurements and the transfer of the gravity value to a given height above the benchmark (Sect. 3.8) can be handled separately.
In order to associate the measured gravity value with a specific height above the marker (reference: highest point of the marker), it is recommended to provide the distance between the effective position on the freefall trajectory and the marker, labeled as the “effective instrumental height” in Fig. 1. It allows for a correct transfer of the gravity value to any other height above or on top of the benchmark. In contrast, the “effective measurement height” as introduced, e.g., by Niebauer (1989) or Timmen (2003), refers to the same position but has its reference inside the gravimeter at the start of the data acquisition (\(t=0\,\hbox {s}\), Fig. 1) or at the position \(z=0\,\hbox {m}\), respectively.
The effective instrumental height depends on the type of absolute gravimeter, its actual setup and the processed section of the zero crossings. For the FG5, FG5–X and A10 gravimeters, it ranges around 1.21 m, 1.27 m and 0.68 m, respectively. The effective position on the freefall trajectory should be determined individually following, e.g., the simple empirical approach as given in Pálinkáš et al. (2012), allowing for an accuracy better than 0.1 mm.
A transfer from the effective instrumental height to any other height above the marker requires additional information about the VGG and is increasing the uncertainty of the absolute gravity value. Therefore, for highest accuracy it is preferred to provide the gravity value at the effective instrumental height which should be determined with an accuracy of about 1 mm. Alternatively, it is possible to report the gravity value at any height of the user’s choice, however, by applying the same constant vertical gravity gradient \(\gamma \) as used in the observation equation of absolute gravimeters. This allows to restore the gravity value to the effective instrumental height and further apply a more precise/actual vertical transfer according to Sect. 3.8.
The following set of information has to be reported along with the gravity value referred to the height above the marker:

1.
The effective instrumental height (preferably the same as reported with the gravity value). If missing, the height based on gravimeter type can be used.

2.
The VGG used in the observation equation.
In case that the gravity value was evaluated exactly at the effective instrumental height, the VGG is not strictly necessary but should nevertheless be reported.
3.8 Vertical gravity gradient
In order to transfer the absolute gravity value from the effective instrumental height to a common reference height, e.g., to harmonize results by different instruments or to refer the result to the marker on the benchmark, the actual vertical gravity gradient above the benchmark should be used. This gradient can be different from those used within the observation equation of freefall (Sect. 3.7) and can be also approximated by higher order polynomials. It is recommended to include any available information about the gradient determination along the vertical (constant value, polynomial model, etc.) in the report of absolute gravity measurements.
At the reference and comparison stations, it is recommended to determine gradients from measurements of relative gravimeters carried out at least at three levels above the benchmark, covering the range of typical instrument heights. If no information about the vertical gravity gradient can be obtained, the normal vertical gravity gradient of \(308.6\times 10^{8}\,\hbox {s}^{2}\) should be applied.
4 Infrastructure
The main infrastructure of the IGRF is formed by gravity stations of three different types:

Reference stations are essential to ensure a longterm stable absolute gravity reference. Here, a gravity reference function provides the mean absolute level and residual gravity variations after reduction of timedependent gravity effects as given in Sect. 3. It can be derived from continuous operation of a superconducting gravimeter (SG) in combination with repeated absolute gravity observations or a continuously operated absolute quantum gravimeter. If a continuous monitoring is not possible, repeated absolute gravity observations every two months are recommended to capture annual variations, mainly of hydrological origin. For stations operating a SG, it is recommended to perform absolute gravity observations every two years for the determination of the SG instrumental drift. Stations of the International Geodynamics and Earth Tide Service (IGETS) (Boy et al. 2020) with longterm SG records should become an essential part of the IGRF.

Comparison stations are reference stations as described above with extended facilities to check the compatibility of instruments, either based on continuous gravity monitoring or by simultaneous measurements of at least two absolute gravimeters. Calibration may serve as a tool to document significant systematic deviations in order to improve or restore the compatibility and should follow the “CCM – IAG Strategy for Metrology in Absolute Gravimetry”.

Core stations provide a link to the ITRF where at least one space geodetic technique is established and GGOS core sites play an essential role. A GGOS core site is a geodetic observatory that defines terrestrial reference points in the space and time domain and in the presence of the Earth’s gravity field permanently by delivering decadal time series. Observational data from complementary colocated instruments are used in a synergistic way, to obtain the most accurate global reference frame (Appleby et al. 2015). In accordance with the GGOS requirements for core sites, it is therefore recommended to continuously monitor temporal gravity variations and to repeat absolute gravity observations at all GGOS core sites.
In order to guarantee sustainability of the gravity reference frame, all stations of the IGRF need to be indicated by a permanent marker. All measurements at these stations should be documented and archived in the IAG absolute gravity database (AGrav) operated by BGI (Bureau Gravimétrique International^{Footnote 12}) and IGETS (International Geodynamics and Earth Tide Service^{Footnote 13}) for static and time variable measurements respectively. By this, the basis for the further development of compatible infrastructure on the national level is provided.
5 Conclusions and Outlook
A concept for the gravity reference system and the frame as its realization is described, based on the instantaneous acceleration of freefall as the measurand, the traceability to the International System of Units (SI) and sets of conventional gravity corrections for timeinvariant and timedependent components of gravity effects. While the system must remain stable over time, the frame is realized by observations with absolute gravimeters corrected for temporal gravity changes by models which may be adapted to future improvements. A set of models along with wellestablished standards are proposed, representing minimum requirements.
The IGRF is realized by measurements with absolute gravimeters at any time. These instruments need to be compared at different levels, from international comparisons under guidance of the CIPM to additional comparisons for users in geosciences. This is an essential part of the concept and underlines the need to continue the common efforts of metrology and geodesy. To ensure their stability, the instruments should be further monitored at reference stations where a gravity reference function is available.
To make the IGRF accessible to users and to finally replace the previous IGSN71 network, an adequate infrastructure based on absolute gravity measurements needs to be built up. This requires the support of international and national institutions, agencies and governmental bodies in charge of geodetic infrastructure which are encouraged to establish compatible first order gravity networks and to provide information about existing absolute gravity observations. This was acknowledged by IAG with Resolution No. 4 of 2019 and provides the frame for activities IAG Joint Working Group 2.1.1. to establish the IGRF.
A modern and precise absolute gravity reference system will serve as a longterm and precise gravity reference for IAG’s Global Geodetic Observing System and will contribute to the establishment of the Global Geodetic Reference Frame (GGRF) of UNGGIM.
Data availability statement
This paper is not based on datasets.
Notes
A key comparison is one of the set of comparisons to test the principal techniques and methods in the field.
The small difference to the value of a as given in Boedecker (1988) has no impact on this correction.
References
Agnew DC (2012) SPOTL: Some Programs for OceanTide Loading. UC San Diego: Library—Scripps Digital Collection, La Jolla CA, https://escholarship.org/uc/item/954322pg. Accessed 9 Oct 2020
Altamimi Z, Rebischung P, Métivier L, Collilieux X (2016) ITRF2014: a new release of the International Terrestrial Reference Frame modeling nonlinear station motions. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 121(8):6109–6131. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JB013098
Angermann D, Gruber T, Gerstl M, Heinkelmann R, Hugentobler U, Sánchez L, Steigenberger P (2016) GGOS Bureau of Products and Standards: inventory of standards and conventions used for the generation of IAG products.In: Drewes H, Kuglitsch F, Adám J, Rózsa S (eds) The geodesist’s handbook 2016. J Geod 90(10):1095–1156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001900160948z
Appleby G, Behrend D, Bergstrand S, Donovan H, Emerson C, Esper J, Hase H, Long J, Ma C, McCormick D, Noll C, Pavlis E, Ferrage P, Pearlman M, Saunier J, Stowers D, Wetzel S (2015) GGOS Requirements for Core Sites (Revision 2). Technical report, Global Geodetic Observing System (GGOS)
Biolcati E, Svitlov S, Germak A (2012) Selfattraction effect and correction on three absolute gravimeters. Metrologia 49(4):560–566. https://doi.org/10.1088/00261394/49/4/560
Bizouard C, Lambert S, Gattano C, Becker O, Richard JY (2019) The IERS EOP 14C04 solution for Earth orientation parameters consistent with ITRF 2014. J Geod 93(5):621–633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s0019001811863
Boedecker G (1988) The International Absolute Gravity Basestation Network (IAGBN). Absolute gravity observations data processing standards and station documentation. BGI Bull d’Inf 63:51–57
Bos MS, Scherneck HG (2013) Computation of Green’s functions for ocean tide loading. In: Xu G (ed) Sciences of Geodesy  II: Innovations and Future Developments, Springer, Berlin, pp 1–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/9783642280009_1
Boy J, Barriot J, Förste C, Voigt C, Wziontek H (2020) Achievements of the first 4 years of the International Geodynamics and Earth Tide Service (IGETS) 2015–2019. In: International Association of Geodesy Symposia, Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/1345_2020_94
Boy JP, Hinderer J (2006) Study of the seasonal gravity signal in superconducting gravimeter data. J Geodyn 41(1):227–233, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jog.2005.08.035, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264370705001341, earth Tides and Geodynamics: Probing the Earth at SubSeismic Frequencies
Boy JP, Longuevergne L, Boudin F, Jacob T, Lyard F, Llubes M, Florsch N, Esnoult MF (2009) Modelling atmospheric and induced nontidal oceanic loading contributions to surface gravity and tilt measurements. J Geodyn 48(3):182–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jog.2009.09.022
Creutzfeldt B, Güntner A, Klügel T, Wziontek H (2008) Simulating the influence of water storage changes on the superconducting gravimeter of the Geodetic Observatory Wettzell, Germany. Geophysics 73(6):WA95–WA104. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2992508
Creutzfeldt B, Güntner A, Wziontek H, Merz B (2010) Reducing local hydrology from highprecision gravity measurements: a Lysimeterbased approach. Geophys J Int 183(1):178–187. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365246X.2010.04742.x
Dehant V, Defraigne P, Wahr JM (1999) Tides for a convective Earth. J Geophys Res 104(B1):1035–1058. https://doi.org/10.1029/1998JB900051
Falk R, Müller J, Lux N, Wilmes H, Wziontek H (2012) Precise Gravimetric Surveys with the Field Absolute Gravimeter A10. In: Kenyon S, Pacino MC, Marti U (eds) Geodesy for Planet Earth. Springer, Berlin, pp 273–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/9783642203381_33
Freier C, Hauth M, Schkolnik V, Leykauf B, Schilling M, Wziontek H, Scherneck HG, Müller J, Peters A (2016) Mobile quantum gravity sensor with unprecedented stability. J Phys Conf Ser 723:012050. https://doi.org/10.1088/17426596/723/1/012050
Gillot P, Cheng B, Imanaliev A, Merlet S, Santos FPD (2016) The LNE SYRTE cold atom gravimeter. In: Proceedings of the 30th EFTF, York, United Kingdom, 4th7th April 2016
Hartmann T, Wenzel HG (1995) The HW95 tidal potential catalogue. Geophys Res Lett 22(24):3553–3556. https://doi.org/10.1029/95GL03324
Ihde J, Sánchez L, Barzaghi R, Drewes H, Foerste C, Gruber T, Liebsch G, Marti U, Pail R, Sideris M (2017) Definition and proposed realization of the International Height Reference System (IHRS). Surv Geophys 38(3):549–570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s1071201794093
Klügel T, Wziontek H (2009) Correcting gravimeters and tiltmeters for atmospheric mass attraction using operational weather models. J Geodyn 48(3–5):204–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jog.2009.09.010
Křen P, Pálinkáš V, Mašika P (2018) On the determination of verticality and Eötvös effects in absolute gravimetry. Metrologia 55(4):451–459. https://doi.org/10.1088/16817575/aac522
Křen P, Pálinkáš V, Mašika P, Val’ko M (2019) FFT swept filtering: a biasfree method for processing fringe signals in absolute gravimeters. J Geod 93(2):219–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001900181154y
Kudryavtsev SM (2004) Improved harmonic development of the earth tidegenerating potential. J Geod 77(12):829–838. https://doi.org/10.1007/s0019000303612
Letellier T (2004) Etude des ondes de marée sur les plateaux continentaux. PhD thesis, Université de Toulouse III, Ecole Doctorale des Sciences de l’Univers, de l’Environnement et de l’Espace
Li C, Jy Xu, Feng Jy SU, Dw WU Sq (2015a) Correction of NIM3A absolute gravimeter for selfattraction effect. In: Cui J, Tan J, Wen X (eds) Ninth International Symposium on Precision Engineering Measurement and Instrumentation, International Society for Optics and Photonics, vol 9446. SPIE, pp 41–46. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2083901
Li Z, Hu H, Wu K, Li G, Wang G, Wang LJ (2015b) Selfattraction effect and correction on the T1 absolute gravimeter. Metrologia 52(6):793–799. https://doi.org/10.1088/00261394/52/6/793
Lyard F, Lefevre F, Letellier T, Francis O (2006) Modelling the global ocean tides: modern insights from FES2004. Ocean Dyn 56(5):394–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s102360060086x
Mäkinen J (2020, submitted) The permanent tide and the International Height Reference Frame IHRF. Journal of Geodesy arXiv:2006.08440
Ménoret V, Vermeulen P, Le Moigne N, Bonvalot S, Bouyer P, Landragin A, Desruelle B (2018) Gravity measurements below \(10^{9}\) g with a transportable absolute quantum gravimeter. Sci Rep 8(1):12300. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598018306081
Morelli C, Gantar C, Honkasalo T, McConnell R, Tanner J, Szabo B, U U, Whalen C (1974) The International Gravity Standardization Net 1971 (I.G.S.N.71). International Association of Geodesy, Special Publication 4 https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a006203.pdf. Accessed 9 Oct 2020
Nagornyi VD, Zanimonskiy YM, Zanimonskiy YY (2011a) Correction due to the finite speed of light in absolute gravimeters. Metrologia 48(3):101–113. https://doi.org/10.1088/00261394/48/3/004
Nagornyi VD, Zanimonskiy YM, Zanimonskiy YY (2011b) Correction due to the finite speed of light in absolute gravimeters. Metrologia 48(3):231–231. https://doi.org/10.1088/00261394/48/3/c01
Niebauer TM (1989) The effective measurement height of freefall absolute gravimeters. Metrologia 26(2):115–118. https://doi.org/10.1088/00261394/26/2/005
Niebauer TM, Sasagawa GS, Faller JE, Hilt R, Klopping F (1995) A new generation of absolute gravimeters. Metrologia 32(3):159–180. https://doi.org/10.1088/00261394/32/3/004
Niebauer TM, Billson R, Ellis B, Mason B, van Westrum D, Klopping F (2011) Simultaneous gravity and gradient measurements from a recoilcompensated absolute gravimeter. Metrologia 48(3):154–163. https://doi.org/10.1088/00261394/48/3/009
Niebauer TM, Billson R, Schiel A, van Westrum D, Klopping F (2012) The selfattraction correction for the FG5X absolute gravity meter. Metrologia 50(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1088/00261394/50/1/1
Pálinkáš V, Liard J, Jiang Z (2012) On the effective position of the freefall solution and the selfattraction effect of the FG5 gravimeters. Metrologia 49(4):552–559. https://doi.org/10.1088/00261394/49/4/552
Petit G, Luzum B (eds) (2010) IERS Conventions (2010), IERS Technical Notes, vol 32, Verlag des Bundesamts für Kartographie und Geodäsie, Frankfurt am Main, Germany, http://www.iers.org/TN36. Accessed 9 Oct 2020
Plag HP, Pearlman M (2009) Global Geodetic Observing System. Springer, Berlin
Robertsson L (2007) On the diffraction correction in absolute gravimetry. Metrologia 44(1):35–39. https://doi.org/10.1088/00261394/44/1/005
Robinson IA (2011) Towards the redefinition of the kilogram: a measurement of the Planck constant using the NPL mark II watt balance. Metrologia 49(1):113–156. https://doi.org/10.1088/00261394/49/1/016
Robinson IA, Schlamminger S (2016) The watt or Kibble balance: a technique for implementing the new SI definition of the unit of mass. Metrologia 53(5):A46–A74. https://doi.org/10.1088/00261394/53/5/a46
Tamura (1987) A harmonic development of the tidegenerating potential. Bull d’Information des Marées Terrestres 9:6813–6855
Timmen L (2003) Precise definition of the effective measurement height of freefall absolute gravimeters. Metrologia 40(2):62–65. https://doi.org/10.1088/00261394/40/2/310
Van Camp M, de Viron O, Watlet A, Meurers B, Francis O, Caudron C (2017) Geophysics from terrestrial timevariable gravity measurements. Rev Geophys 55(4):938–992. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017RG000566
Wahr JM (1985) Deformation induced by polar motion. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 90(B11):9363–9368. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB090iB11p09363
van Westrum D, Niebauer TM (2003) The diffraction correction for absolute gravimeters. Metrologia 40(5):258–263. https://doi.org/10.1088/00261394/40/5/008
Wilmes H, Vitushkin L, Pálinkáš V, Falk R, Wziontek H, Bonvalot S (2016) Towards the definition and realization of a global absolute gravity reference system. In: Freymueller JT, Sánchez L (eds) International Symposium on Earth and Environmental Sciences for Future Generations, vol 147. Springer, Cham, pp 25–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/1345_2016_245
Wziontek H, Wilmes H, Bonvalot S (2012) AGrav: An International Database for Absolute Gravity Measurements. In: Kenyon S, Pacino MC, Marti U (eds) Geodesy for Planet Earth, International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 136. Springer, Berlin, pp 1037–1042. https://doi.org/10.1007/9783642203381_130
Acknowledgements
The authors sincerely thank the members of the IAG Joint Working Group 2.1.1 “Establishment of a global absolute gravity reference system” for their cooperation and numerous, highly valuable comments and suggestions. We further thank three anonymous reviewers who helped us to improve this paper. V. P. acknowledges the financial support from the project “Research related with International Gravity Reference System” funded by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic (MS̆MT) under grant no. LTT19008. The authors also thank the agencies CNES, CNRS/INSU, IGN, IRD (France) and BKG (Germany) for their support to BGI activities in absolute gravimetry.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The concept was developed by all authors in the frame of IAG Joint Working Group 2.1.1 chaired by H.W. and S.B. The paper was written by H.W. with contributions from S.B. and G.G., R.F and A.R., J.M., V.P. and L.V.
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Wziontek, H., Bonvalot, S., Falk, R. et al. Status of the International Gravity Reference System and Frame. J Geod 95, 7 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190020014389
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190020014389