2004 Sumatra tsunami
We first extracted the GRACE ground tracks in the region from longitudes of 35° E to 130° E and latitudes of 40° S to 26° N over the 24 h after the Sumatra earthquake, which occurred on 26 December 2004 00:58:53 UTC (Figure S2). We then selected those arcs that matched the tsunami wave propagation in time and space (Figure S3). The GRACE satellites first flew over the tsunami 1 h 15 min after the earthquake in an ascending track, when the tsunami wave height was as large as 40 cm and the induced surface gravity change was ~ 20 µGal (Figure S4).
We compared the GRACE observed LGD with the tsunami model LGD computed using the earthquake source model from Ammon et al. (2005), for the arc shown in Fig. 2a. Figure 2b shows the model LGD (in blue) and GRACE observation (in red) time series as a function of latitude. We applied low-pass filtering at 50 CPR to suppress the high-frequency noise in the GRACE LGD data. The two negative anomalies of − 2.5 and − 2 nm/s2 found in the GRACE LGD data at latitudes 5° S and 15° N, respectively, correspond to the positive tsunami wave around the same latitudes where the southern and northern leading edges of the tsunami are located. The large crest of 4 nm/s2 found at latitude 5° N is caused by the notable negative sea level anomalies found in the model in that region. The remarkable agreement between the GRACE data and tsunami model from latitude 10° S to 20° N expresses the exceptionally large tsunami (40 cm over wavelengths of few hundred km). The orbits of the GRACE satellites were significantly perturbed by the transient gravity change due to the tsunami so that their inter-satellite distance changes were detectable by the KBR system.
If the GRACE LGD observations along the ascending arc in Fig. 2b were to be associated with transient tsunami waves, they should have not appeared along the descending arc crossing the same region with ~ 12 h of time difference because tsunamis would not last over the region for such a long period. To demonstrate this, we compared the GRACE LGD data along the ascending track (Fig. 2a) with the descending track (Fig. 2c) covering the same region most closely but roughly 12 h later. The LGD data from the descending track and the corresponding model synthetics are shown in Fig. 2d. With the diffusive tsunami propagation, we do not expect to observe the same size of gravitational perturbation 12 h later. As expected, both the GRACE data and the model show no significant anomaly in the descending track (Fig. 2d). For other cases of GRACE overpassing tsunamis (such as arc numbers 5, 6, and 7 in Figure S3), the tsunami signal did not emerge from the GRACE data due to the measurement noise as well as natural oceanic variability.
To quantify the agreement between GRACE and the tsunami model, we applied consistent low-pass filters to both the GRACE and tsunami LGD time series at 40, 50, and 60 CPR frequencies (see Figure S5). The correlation coefficients between GRACE and the tsunami model from latitude 10° S to 20° N, where GRACE satellites were over the tsunami waves, are 0.99, 0.98, and 0.98. The RMS signal reduction, which is computed as \( \left( {1 - \frac{{{\text{RMS}}\left( {{\text{LGD}}^{\text{GRACE}} - {\text{LGD}}^{\text{tsunami}} } \right)}}{{{\text{RMS}}\left( {{\text{LGD}}^{\text{GRACE}} } \right)}}} \right) \), is 0.79, 0.76, and 0.74, respectively. We note that the same results in terms of correlation and RMS reduction were obtained when we applied a band-pass filter between 5 and 50 CPR to GRACE and tsunami data along the arc number 1. To demonstrate the statistical significance of the results, we also compared the GRACE LGD along the arc number 5 sampling the same region with ~ 12 h of difference (Fig. 2c) with the tsunami LGD along arc number 1. The correlation and RMS reduction in this case is reduced to − 0.50 and − 1.84, respectively (see Table S1 in supporting information). This is due to the dissipation of tsunami waves over time.
We examined the GRACE tsunami data for contrasting different earthquake source models, as done in Han et al. (2010) but using the solid Earth deformation signals (not tsunamis). We computed the model LGD perturbation with the seismic source of Hébert et al. (2007), shown in black in Fig. 2b. It is seen that the tsunami model with the seismic source from Ammon et al. (2005), which is closer to the moment release estimate by Okal and Stein (2009) using ultra-long period normal mode data, compares better with the GRACE data in terms of both amplitude and phase. This example shows a potential benefit of GRACE-like data for assessing alternate early source models, improving tsunami model simulations, and providing enhanced constraints on seismic source parameters.
2010 Maule tsunami
We found a total of 14 GRACE ground tracks in the region from longitudes of 130° E to 300° E and latitudes of 70° S to 70° N in the 24 h after the 2010 Maule earthquake, which occurred on 27 February 2010 06:34:11 UTC (Figure S6). Unfortunately, the first two tracks that match the tsunami propagation in time and space do not occur until 11, and 12 h 30 min after the earthquake (arc numbers 7 and 8 in Figure S7). By that time, the tsunami wave energy had dissipated, with the largest remaining amplitude being < 10 cm at the wave front.
We examined in detail arc number 9, where the GRACE satellites passed over the center of the leading edge of the tsunami waves in an ascending track ~ 14 h after the earthquake. Figure 3a shows that the leading edge at latitude of ~ 30° E propagates northwest with an amplitude of ~ 10 cm and an equivalent surface gravity change of ~ 4 µGal (Figure S8). The observed and simulated LGD agrees over latitudes 20° N to 40° N (Fig. 3b). GRACE detected the positive sea level change at the leading edge of the tsunami as well as other oceanic variability in other regions with similar sea level perturbation. Such a signal is not found in the GRACE LGD from latitude 20° N to 40° N along the descending track crossing the same region ~ 12 h before (Fig. 3c, d). The correlation and RMS reduction between the low-pass filtered GRACE and tsunami model LGD at 40 CPR along the ascending arc number 9 from latitude 20° N to 40° N are ~ 0.9 and 0.60, respectively, and slightly less agreement is found when higher CPR is used (see Figure S9). To show the statistical significance of these values, we note that the correlation and RMS reduction between GRACE LGD along the descending arc number 2 (Fig. 3c), which passes over the same region as the arc number 9, and the transient tsunami LGD along the arc number 9 are − 0.30 and − 0.53, respectively (see Table S1).
There is another arc of the GRACE satellites crossing over the tsunami (arc number 10 in Figure S7), an ascending arc 90 min after arc number 9 shown in Fig. 3. The results of GRACE and model comparison for this pass are shown in Figure S10. The largest signals are observed near the equator, where the GRACE satellites detected the wave front.
2011 Tohoku tsunami
The 2011 Tohoku earthquake triggered a catastrophic tsunami on 11 March 2011 at 05:46:24 UTC. The GRACE satellites first flew over the tsunami on a descending track about 3 h 45 min after the earthquake (Figure S11 and S12). Figure 4a shows that the GRACE satellites flew over the tsunami wave field into the northward propagating wave front at latitude of 55° N, and exited from the southward propagating wave front at latitude 10° N. The southward leading edge is particularly prominent with an amplitude of 20 cm and surface gravity change of 8 µGal (Figure S13). The GRACE LGD observations agree well with the tsunami model over latitudes of 5° N to 60° N where the model predicts a large LGD perturbation (Fig. 4b). The sharp and intense peak of the LGD anomaly of up to − 2 nm/s2 at 10° N is a clear indication of the southern wave front.
The GRACE arc number 9 sampled the same area in an ascending track 12 h after arc number 3 (Fig. 4c). By that time, the tsunami wave field had diminished in that area to less than ± 5 cm, resulting in a less distinguishable tsunami LGD anomaly relative to inherent ocean variability (Fig. 4d). Low-pass filtering of the observed and simulated LGD at the same cutoff frequencies along the descending arc number 3 from latitude 0° N to 60° N results in correlation ≥ 0.8 and RMS reduction ≥ 0.40 (see Figure S14). These high correlation and RMS reduction values are reduced to − 0.16 and − 0.67, respectively, when GRACE LGD along the ascending arc number 9 (Fig. 4c), which covers the same region as arc number 3, is compared to transient tsunami LGD along the arc number 3, illustrating that the gravitational anomalies from latitude 0° N to 60° N were indeed transient (less than ~ 12 h) as expected from tsunami-induced ocean mass changes (see Table S1). The additional comparison for two other possible arcs (number 7 and 8) is also shown in Figures S15 and S16, where the signals from the GRACE data and the model are smaller but still positively correlated.