Skip to main content
Log in

Asynchronous RTK precise DGNSS positioning method for deriving a low-latency high-rate output

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Geodesy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Low-latency high-rate (\(>\)1 Hz) precise real-time kinematic (RTK) can be applied in high-speed scenarios such as aircraft automatic landing, precise agriculture and intelligent vehicle. The classic synchronous RTK (SRTK) precise differential GNSS (DGNSS) positioning technology, however, is not able to obtain a low-latency high-rate output for the rover receiver because of long data link transmission time delays (DLTTD) from the reference receiver. To overcome the long DLTTD, this paper proposes an asynchronous real-time kinematic (ARTK) method using asynchronous observations from two receivers. The asynchronous observation model (AOM) is developed based on undifferenced carrier phase observation equations of the two receivers at different epochs with short baseline. The ephemeris error and atmosphere delay are the possible main error sources on positioning accuracy in this model, and they are analyzed theoretically. In a short DLTTD and during a period of quiet ionosphere activity, the main error sources decreasing positioning accuracy are satellite orbital errors: the “inverted ephemeris error” and the integration of satellite velocity error which increase linearly along with DLTTD. The cycle slip of asynchronous double-differencing carrier phase is detected by TurboEdit method and repaired by the additional ambiguity parameter method. The AOM can deal with synchronous observation model (SOM) and achieve precise positioning solution with synchronous observations as well, since the SOM is only a specific case of AOM. The proposed method not only can reduce the cost of data collection and transmission, but can also support the mobile phone network data link transfer mode for the data of the reference receiver. This method can avoid data synchronizing process besides ambiguity initialization step, which is very convenient for real-time navigation of vehicles. The static and kinematic experiment results show that this method achieves 20 Hz or even higher rate output in real time. The ARTK positioning accuracy is better and more robust than the combination of phase difference over time (PDOT) and SRTK method at a high rate. The ARTK positioning accuracy is equivalent to SRTK solution when the DLTTD is 0.5 s, and centimeter level accuracy can be achieved even when DLTTD is 15 s.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blewitt G (1990) An automatic editing algorithm for GPS data. Geophys Res Lett 17(3):199–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen L, Jiao W, Huang X, Geng C, Ai L, Lu L, Hu Z (2013) Study on signal-in-space errors calculation method and statistical characterization of beidou navigation satellite system. In: China satellite navigation conference (CSNC) 2013 Proceedings, vol 243. Springer, Berlin, pp 423–434

  • Chen X, Han S, Rizos C, Chai Goh P (2000) Improving real time positioning efficiency using the singapore integrated multiple reference station network (SIMRSN). In: Proceedings of ION GPS 2000, Salt Lake City, USA, pp 9–16

  • Comstock SJ (2006) Development of a low-latency, high data rate, differential GPS relative positioning system for UAV formation flight control. Master’s thesis, Air Force Institute of Technology

  • Dogra S, Wright J, Hansen J (2001) Sea-based JPALS relative navigation algorithm development. In: Proceedings of ION GNSS 2005, Long Beach, USA, pp 2871–2881

  • Dow J, Neilan R, Rizos C (2009) The international GNSS service in a changing landscape of global navigation satellite systems. J Geod 83(7):689–689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards S, Cross P, Barnes J, Betaille D (1999) A methodology for benchmarking real time kinematic GPS. Surv Rev 35(273):163–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Euler HJ, Landau H (1992) Fast GPS ambiguity resolution on-the-fly for real-time applications. In: Proceedings of 6th international geodetic symposium on satellite positioning, pp 650–659

  • Gao Y, Li Z, McLellan J (1997) Carrier phase based regional area differential GPS for decimeter-level positioning and navigation. In: Proceedings of ION GPS 1997, Kansas City, USA, pp 1305–1313

  • Gao Y, Liu Z, Liu Z (2002) Internet-based real-time kinematic positioning. GPS Solut 5(3):61–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths J, Ray J (2009) On the precision and accuracy of IGS orbits. J Geod 83(3–4):277–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han S, Rizos C (1996) GPS network design and error mitigation for real-time continuous array monitoring systems. In: Proceedings of of ION GPS 1996, Kansas City, USA, pp 1827–1836

  • Hatch R, Sharpe R, Yang Y (2007) GPS navigation using successive differences of carrier-phase measurements. US Patent 7,212,155 B2

  • Hauschild A, Montenbruck O, Steigenberger P (2013) Short-term analysis of GNSS clocks. GPS solut 17(3):295–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann-Wellenhof B, Lichtenegger H, Collins J (2001) Global positioning system: theory and practice, 5th edn. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hu Z, Chen G, Zhang Q, Guo J, Su X, Li X, Zhao Q, Liu J (2013) An initial evaluation about BDS navigation message accuracy. China satellite navigation conference (CSNC) 2013 Proceedings. Springer, Berlin, pp 479–491

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence DG (1999) Reference carrier phase prediction for kinematic GPS. US Patent 5,903,236

  • Michaud S, Santerre R (2001) Time-relative positioning with a single civil GPS receiver. GPS Solut 5(2):71–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohamed A, Schwarz K (1998) A simple and economical algorithm for GPS ambiguity resolution on the fly using a whitening filter. Navig: J Inst Navig 45:221–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montenbruck O, Steigenberger P, Hauschild A (2014) Broadcast versus precise ephemerides: a multi-GNSS perspective. GPS Solut 19(2):321–333. doi:10.1007/s10291-014-0390-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newby S, Corcoran W (1995) What’s new from NovAtel. In: Proceedings of ION GPS 1995, Palm Springs, USA, pp 133–140

  • Raquet J (1998) Development of a method for kinematic GPS carrier-phase ambiguity resolution using multiple reference receivers. Dissertation, University of Calgary

  • Remondi BW (1985) Performing centimeter-level surveys in seconds with GPS carrier phase: initial results. Navigation 32(4):386–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sjöberg LE (1999) Unbiased vs biased estimation of GPS phase ambiguities from dual-frequency code and phase observables. J Geod 73(3):118–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steigenberger P, Hugentobler U, Hauschild A, Montenbruck O (2013) Orbit and clock analysis of Compass GEO and IGSO satellites. J Geod 87(6):515–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teunissen P (1993) Least-squares estimation of the integer GPS ambiguities. In: Invited lecture, section IV “theory and methodology”, at the general meeting of the International Association of Geodesy, Beijing, China, pp 1–16

  • Teunissen P (1995) The least-squares ambiguity decorrelation adjustment: a method for fast GPS integer ambiguity estimation. J Geod 70(1–2):65–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teunissen P (1997) A canonical theory for short GPS baselines. Part I: the baseline precision. J Geod 71(6):320–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teunissen P, Kleusberg A (1998) GPS for geodesy, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Ou J, Yuan Y (2011) Strategy of data processing for GPS rover and reference receivers using different sampling rates. Geosci Remote Sens IEEE Trans 49(3):1144–1149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wanninger L (1999) The performance of virtual reference stations in active geodetic GPS-networks under solar maximum conditions. In: Proceedings of ION GPS 1999, Nashville, USA, pp 1419–1427

  • Wübbena G, Bagge A, Seeber G, Boeder V, Hankemeier P (1996) Reducing distance dependent errors for real-time precise DGPS applications by establishing reference station networks. In: Proceedings of ION GPS 1996, Kansas City, USA, pp 1845–1852

  • Xu G (2007) GPS: theory, algorithm and application, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Zhang K, Grenfell R, Deakin R (2006) GPS satellite velocity and acceleration determination using the broadcast ephemeris. J Navig 59(02):293–305

  • Zhodzishsky M, Vorobiev M, Khvalkov A, Ashjaee J (1998) Real-time kinematic (RTK) processing for dual-frequency GPS/GLONASS. In: Proceedings of ION GPS 1998, Nashville, USA, pp 1325–1331

Download references

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge engineer Meng Liansheng for the experimental data provided. We also thank the other colleagues of our laboratory for supporting this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhang Liang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liang, Z., Hanfeng, L., Dingjie, W. et al. Asynchronous RTK precise DGNSS positioning method for deriving a low-latency high-rate output. J Geod 89, 641–653 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-015-0803-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-015-0803-7

Keywords

Navigation