Abstract
Combinations of station coordinates and velocities from independent space-geodetic techniques have long been the standard method to realize robust global terrestrial reference frames (TRFs). In principle, the particular strengths of one observing method can compensate for weaknesses in others if the combination is properly constructed, suitable weights are found, and accurate co-location ties are available. More recently, the methodology has been extended to combine time-series of results at the normal equation level. This allows Earth orientation parameters (EOPs) to be included and aligned in a fully consistent way with the TRF. While the utility of such multi-technique combinations is generally recognized for the reference frame, the benefits for the EOPs are yet to be quantitatively assessed. In this contribution, which is a sequel to a recent paper on co-location ties (Ray and Altamimi in J Geod 79(4–5): 189–195, 2005), we have studied test combinations of very long baseline interferometry (VLBI) and Global Positioning System (GPS) time-series solutions to evaluate the effects on combined EOP measurements compared with geophysical excitations. One expects any effect to be small, considering that GPS dominates the polar motion estimates due to its relatively dense and uniform global network coverage, high precision, continuous daily sampling, and homogeneity, while VLBI alone observes UT1-UTC. Presently, although clearly desirable, we see no practical method to rigorously include the GPS estimates of length-of-day variations due to significant time-varying biases. Nevertheless, our results, which are the first of this type, indicate that more accurate polar motion from GPS contributes to improved UT1-UTC results from VLBI. The situation with combined polar motion is more complex. The VLBI data contribute directly only very slightly, if at all, with an impact that is probably affected by the weakness of the current VLBI networks (small size and sparseness) and the quality of local ties relating the VLBI and GPS frames. Instead, the VLBI polar motion information is used primarily in rotationally aligning the VLBI and GPS frames, thereby reducing the dependence on co-location tie information. Further research is needed to determine an optimal VLBI-GPS combination strategy that yields the highest quality EOP estimates. Improved local ties (including internal systematic effects within the techniques) will be critically important in such an effort.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Altamimi Z, Sillard P, Boucher C (2002) ITRF2000: a new release of the International Terrestrial Reference Frame for Earth science application. J Geophys Res 107(B10):2214, doi:10.1029/2001JB000561
Altamimi Z (2003) Consistency of multi-technique combination of TRF and EOP, EGS-AGU-EUG Joint Assembly. Geophys Res Abstr 5:02908
Altamimi Z, Boucher C (2003) Multi-technique combination of time series of station positions and Earth orientation parameters. In: Richter B, Schwegmann W, Dick WR (eds) Proceedings of the IERS workshop on combination research and global geophysical fluids, IERS Technical Note No. 30. Verlag des Bundesamts für Kartographie und Geodäsie, Frankfurt am Main, pp 102–106
Barnes RTH, Hide R, White AA, Wilson CA (1983) Atmospheric angular momentum fluctuations, length-of-day changes and polar motion. Proc R Soc Lond A 387:31–73
Ferland R (2004) Reference Frame Working Group technical report. In: Gowey K, Neilan R, Moore A (eds) IGS 2001–2002 Technical Reports. Jet Propulsion Laboratory Publication 04–017, Pasadena, California, pp 25–33
Gross R (2004) Combinations of Earth orientation measurements: SPACE2003, COMB2003, and POLE2003. Jet Propulsion Laboratory Publication 04–12, Pasadena California, p 28
International VLBI Service for Geodesy and Astrometry (IVS) (2004) Products and publications available at http://ivscc.gsfc.nasa.gov/
Kalnay E et al (1996) The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 77:437–471
Kouba J (2005) Comparison of polar motion with oceanic and atmospheric angular momentum time series for 2-day to Chandler periods. J Geodesy doi:10.1007/s00190-005-0440-7
Kouba J, Ray J, Watkins M (1998) IGS reference frame realization. In: Dow JM, Kouba J, Springer T (eds) 1998 IGS Analysis Center Workshop Proceedings. European Space Operations Centre, Darmstadt, Germany, pp 139–171
McCarthy DD, Petit G (eds) (2004) IERS Conventions (2003), IERS Technical Note No. 32. Verlag des Bundesamts für Kartographie und Geodäsie, Frankfurt am Main, p 127
Mireault Y, Kouba J, Ray J (1999) IGS Earth rotation parameters. GPS Solut 3(1):59–72
Ponte RM (1993) Variability in a homogeneous global ocean forced by barometric pressure. Dyn Atmos Oceans 18:209–234
Ponte RM, Ali AH (2002) Rapid ocean signals in polar motion and length of day. Geophys Res Lett 29(15), doi:10.1029/2002GL015312
Ray J (1996) Measurements of length of day using the Global Positioning System. J Geophys Res 101(B9):20141–20149
Ray J, Kouba J (2003) Comparisons of single- and multi-technique combinations of polar motion observations, EGS-AGU-EUG Joint Assembly. Geophys Res Abstr 5:05937
Ray J, Altamimi Z (2005) Evaluation of co-location ties relating the VLBI and GPS frames. J Geod 79(4–5):189–195, doi:10.1007/s00190-005—0456-z
Richter B, Schwegmann W, Dick WR (eds) (2003) In: Proceedings of the IERS workshop on combination research and global geophysical fluids, IERS Technical Note No. 30. Verlag des Bundesamts für Kartographie und Geodäsie, Frankfurt am Main, p 235
Robertson DS, Carter WE, Campbell J, Schuh H (1985) Daily Earth rotation determinations from IRIS very long baseline interferometry. Nature 316:424–427
Rothacher M, Beutler G, Herring TA, Weber R (1999) Estimation of nutation using the Global Positioning System. J Geophys Res 104(B3):4835–4860
Yoder CF, Williams JG, Parke ME (1981) Tidal variations of Earth rotation. J Geophys Res 86:881–891
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ray, J., Kouba, J. & Altamimi, Z. Is there utility in rigorous combinations of VLBI and GPS Earth orientation parameters?. J Geodesy 79, 505–511 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-005-0007-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-005-0007-7