Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Critical success factors of strategic cost reduction

Results from an empirical survey of German cost reduction projects

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Management Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cost reduction is usually confronted with conflicts and resistance. Besides planning and controlling measures the management accounting literature discusses behavioral and organizational factors (e.g., top management commitment, participation, cost culture) in order to overcome this resistance. Thus, from a theoretical perspective different concepts exist for implementing an effective long-term cost reduction. However, only little empirical research can be found that investigates the relative importance of “soft” behavioral and implementation factors compared to general planning and control measures. This study examines the role of behavioral and organizational (“soft”) factors in comparison to planning and control (“hard”) factors in cost reduction projects. Target costing or activity-based costing projects represent examples for strategic cost reduction projects which are considered in this study. The sample comprises 131 chief management accountants of medium-size and large German companies which were involved in such strategic cost reduction projects. Structural equation modeling is used for deriving the results. The results show that cost culture, top management commitment, and participation are of particular importance for the success of cost reductions. Their influence drives significantly planning and controlling measures which in turn determine the effectiveness of cost reduction measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albers, S., & Hildebrandt, L. (2006). Methodische Probleme bei der Erfolgsfaktorenforschung – Messfehler, formative und reflektive Indikatoren und die Wahl des Strukturgleichungs-Modells. ZFBF. Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, 58(2), 2–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, S. W., & Young, M. S. (1999). The impact of contextual and process factors on the evaluation of activity-based costing systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 24(7), 525–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ansari, S. L., & Bell, J. E. (1997). Target costing: the next frontier in strategic cost management. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aranda, C., & Arellano, J. (2010). Consensus and link structure in strategic performance measurement systems: a field study. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 22, 271–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. (1980). Causal models in marketing. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bart, C. K. (1993). Controlling new product R&D projects. R & D Management, 23, 187–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belsley, D., Kuh, E., & Welsch, R. (1980). Regression diagnostics: identifying influential data and sources of collinearity. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bettencourt, L., & Brown, S. (1997). Contact employees: relationships among workplace fairness, job satisfaction and prosocial service behaviors. Journal of Retailing, 73(1), 39–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourne, M., Mills, J., Wilcox, M., Neely, A., & Platts, K. (2000). Designing, implementing and updating performance measurement systems. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 20(7), 754–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, B. K. (1991). Strategic planning and financial performance—a meta-analytical review. Journal of Management Studies, 28, 353–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campion, M., Medsker, G., & Higgs, A. (1993). Relations between work team characteristics and effectiveness: implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psychology, 46(Winter), 823–850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, S., & Price, B. (1977). Regression analysis by example. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chenhall, R. H. (2004). The role of cognitive and affective conflict in early implementation of activity-based cost management. Behavioral Research in Accounting , 16, 19–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chenhall, R. H. (2005). Integrative strategic performance measurement systems, strategic alignment of manufacturing, learning and strategic outcomes: an exploratory study. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 30, 395–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chenhall, R. H., Kallunki, J. P., & Silvola, H. (2011). Exploring the relationships between strategy, innovation, and management control systems: the role of social networking, organic innovative culture, and formal controls. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 23, 99–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin, W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In G. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business res (pp. 295–336). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R., & Slagmulder, R. (2004). Interorganizational cost management and relational context. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29(1), 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cugini, A., Carù, A., & Zerbini, F. (2007). The cost of customer satisfaction: a framework for strategic cost management in service industries. European Accounting Review, 16(3), 499–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davila, A., & Wouters, M. (2004). Designing cost-competitive technology products through cost management. Accounting Horizons, 18(1), 13–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (1991). An exploratory analysis relating the software project management process to project success. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 38(4), 365–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamantopoulos, A., & Winklhofer, H. (2001). Index construction with formative indicators: an alternative to scale development. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 269–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, T., & McIntyre, R. (1997). A conceptual framework for teamwork measurement. In M. Brannick, E. Salas, & C. Prince (Eds.), Team performance assessment and measurement: theory, methods and applications (pp. 19–44). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. (1993). An introduction to the bootstrap. Boca Raton: Chapmann & Hall/CRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erez, M., Earley, P. C., & Hulin, C. L. (1985). The impact of participation on goal acceptance and performance: a two-step model. Academy of Management Journal, 28(1), 50–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewert, R., & Ernst, C. (1999). Target costing, co-ordination and strategic cost management. European Accounting Review, 8(1), 23–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, G., & Swenson, D. W. (1997). Measuring the success of activity-based cost management and its determinants. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 9, 109–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, M. (1993). Strategic cost management. Journal of Strategic Change, 2, 261–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedl, B. (2009). Kostenmanagement. Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosselin, M. (1997). The effects of strategy and organizational structure on the adoption and implementation of activity-based costing. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 22(2), 105–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, C., Johnson, M. D., Herrmann, A., & Huber, F. (2002). Capturing customer heterogeneity using a finite mixture PLS approach. Schmalenbach Business Review, 54(3), 243–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Mena, J. A. (2012). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40, 414–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, G. (1993). Quantitative Wirtschaftsforschung. Munich.

  • Harman, H. H. (1967). Modern factor analysis. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Himme, A. (2010). Cost management projects in Germany. Journal of Cost Management, 24(1), 24–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Himme, A. (2009). Kostenmanagement: Bestandsaufnahme und kritische Beurteilung der empirischen Forschung. Zeitschrift fur Betriebswirtschaft, 79(9), 1051–1098.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoozée, S., & Bruggemann, W. (2010). Identifying operational improvements during the design process of a time-driven ABC system: the role of collective worker participation and leadership style. Management Accounting Research, 21, 185–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Innes, J., & Mitchell, F. (1995). A survey of activity-based costing: a survey of CIMA members. Management Accounting Research, 6, 137–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Innes, J., Mitchell, F., & Sinclair, D. (2000). Activity-based costing in the U.K.’s largest companies: a comparison of 1994 and 1999 survey results. Management Accounting Research, 11, 349–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ittner, C. D., Lanen, W. N., & Larcker, D. F. (2002). The association between activity-based costing and manufacturing performance. Journal of Accounting Research, 40(3), 711–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackman Jarvis, C., MacKenzie, S., & Podsakoff, P. (2003). A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(2), 199–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, H., & Kaplan, R. (1991). Relevance lost. The rise and fall of management accounting. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G., & Wold, H. (1982). The ML and PLS techniques for modeling with latent variables: historical and comparative aspects. In K. G. Jöreskog & H. Wold (Eds.), Systems under indirect observation: part I (pp. 263–270). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kajüter, P. (2005). Kostenmanagement in der deutschen Unternehmenspraxis. Empirische Befunde einer branchenübergreifenden Feldstudie. ZFBF. Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift fur Betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, 57(1), 79–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, R. (2001). Cross-functional project groups in research and new product development: diversity, communications, job stress, and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 44(3), 547–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, I., Ansari, S., Bell, J., & Swenson, D. (2002). Target costing practices in the united states. Control, 14(11), 607–614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, H. J. (1989). An integrated control theory of work motivation. The Academy of Management Review, 22, 150–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • KPMG (2007). Kostenstrukturen überdenken – Nachhaltige Wettbewerbsvorteile schaffen, Wien.

  • Lukka, K., & Granlund, M. (1996). Cost accounting in Finland: current practice and trends of development. European Accounting Review, 5(1), 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G., & Sutton, R. I. (1997). Organizational performance as a dependent variable. Organization Science, 8(6), 698–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGowan, A. S. (1998). Perceived benefits of ABCM implementation. Accounting Horizons, 12(1), 31–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGowan, A. S., & Klammer, T. P. (1997). Satisfaction with Activity-Based cost management implementation. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 9, 217–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNair, C. J., Polutnik, L., & Silvi, R. (2001). Cost management and value creation: the missing link. European Accounting Review, 10(1), 33–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H., Raisinghani, D., & Theoret, A. (1976). The structure of unstructured decision processes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 192–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolaou, A. (2003). Manufacturing strategy implementation and cost management systems effectiveness. European Accounting Review, 12(1), 175–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrenga, M. (1990). Activities: the focal point of total cost management. Management Accounting, 71, 42–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, L. W. (1981). Assessing measurement error in key informant reports: a methodological note on organizational analysis in marketing. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 395–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinto, J. (1986). Project implementation: a determination of its critical success factors, moderators and their relative importance across the product life cycle. University of Pittsburgh

  • Pinto, J., & Slevin, D. (1987). Critical factors in successful project implementation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 34(1), 22–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P., MacKenzie, S., Jeong-Yeon, L., & Podsakoff, N. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PwC (2007). Kostenmanagement in der Automobilindustrie: Bestandsaufnahmen und Zukunftspotenziale, Stuttgart/Hannover.

  • Richardson, P. (1988). Cost containment: the ultimate advantage. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Will, A. (2005). SmartPLS 2.0 (M3) Beta, Hamburg. http://www.smartpls.de.

  • Selto, F. (1995). Implementing Activity-Based management. Journal of Cost Management, 9(Summer), 36–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shank, J., & Govindarajan, V. (1993). Strategic cost management: the new tool for competitive advantage. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shields, M. D. (1995). An empirical analysis of firms’ implementation experiences with activity-based costing. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 7, 148–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shields, M. D. (1997). Research in management accounting by North Americans in the 1990s. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 9, 3–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shields, M. D., & Young, S. (1989). A behavioral model for implementing cost management systems. Journal of Cost Management, 3(4), 17–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shields, M. D., & Young, S. (1992). Effective long-term cost reduction: a strategic perspective. Journal of Cost Management, 6(1), 16–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shields, M. D., & Young, S. (1993). Antecedents and consequences of participative budgeting: evidence on the effects of asymmetrical information. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 5(Fall), 265–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shields, M. D., & Young, S. (1994). Managing innovation costs: a study of cost conscious behavior by R&D professionals. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 9, 175–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector, P. E. (2006). Method variance in organizational research. Truth or urban legend? Organizational Research Methods, 9(2), 221–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, A. C., & Smith, K. V. (1993). What really is happening to cost management systems in US manufacturing? The Review of Business Studies, 2, 51–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swenson, D. (1995). The benefits of activity-based cost management to the manufacturing industry. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 7, 167–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swenson, D., & Flesher, D. (1996). Are you satisfied with your cost management system? Management Accounting, 77(March), 49–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swenson, D., Ansari, S., Bell, J., & Kim, I. (2003). Best practices in target costing. Management Accounting Quarterly, 4(2), 12–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tani, T., Okano, H., Shimizu, N., Iwabuchi, Y., Fukuda, J., & Cooray, S. (1994). Target cost management in Japanese companies: current state of the art. Management Accounting Research, 5(1), 67–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thune, S. S., & House, R. J. (1970). Where long-range planning pays off. Business Horizons, 13(4), 81–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vroom, V. H., & Jago, A. G. (1988). The new leadership—managing participation in organisations. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, J., & Hirsch, B. (2005). Kostensenkungsmaßnahmen und die Rolle des Controllings – Empirische Erkenntnisse aus deutschen Unternehmen. Zeitschrift für Controlling und Management, 49(1), 11–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weißenberger, B. E., & Angelkort, H. (2011). Integration of financial and management accounting systems: the mediating influence of a consistent financial language on controllership effectiveness. Management Accounting Research, 22, 160–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wouters, M., & Wilderom, C. (2008). Developing performance-measurement systems as enabling formalization: a longitudinal field study of a logistics department. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(4–5), 488–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Faculty of Management, Economics, and Social Sciences, Chair for Marketing and Market Research, University of Cologne, Albertus-Magnus-Platz, 50923, Cologne, Germany

    Alexander Himme

Authors
  1. Alexander Himme
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander Himme.

Appendix: Table 3

Appendix: Table 3

Table 3 Operationalization of constructs (indicators in italic are combined in an index because of multicollinearity)
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Himme, A. Critical success factors of strategic cost reduction. J Manag Control 23, 183–210 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-012-0157-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-012-0157-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation