Abstract
We consider the problem of determining an optimal strategy for electricity injection that faces an uncertain power demand stream. This demand stream is modeled via an Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process with an additional jump component, whereas the power flow is represented by the linear transport equation. We analytically determine the optimal amount of power supply for different levels of available information and compare the results to each other. For numerical purposes, we reformulate the original problem in terms of the cost function such that classical optimization solvers can be directly applied. The computational results are illustrated for different scenarios.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
https://www.next-kraftwerke.com/knowledge/intraday-trading, last checked: 2nd of April, 2019.
https://de.mathworks.com/help/optim/ug/fmincon.html, last checked: Sept 21, 2018.
References
Aïd R, Campi L, Huu AN, Touzi N (2009) A structural risk-neutral model of electricity prices. Int J Theor Appl Financ 12:925–947
Annunziato M, Borzì A (2013) A Fokker–Planck control framework for multidimensional stochastic processes. J Comput Appl Math 237:487–507
Annunziato M, Borzì A (2018) A Fokker–Planck control framework for stochastic systems. EMS Surv Math Sci 5:65–98
Applebaum D (2009) Lévy processes and stochastic calculus, vol. 116 of Cambridge studies in advanced mathematics, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Barlow MT (2002) A diffusion model for electricity prices. Math Financ 12:287–298
Benth F, Benth J, Koekebakker S (2008) Stochastic modelling of electricity and related markets, vol. 11 of advanced series on statistical science & applied probability. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., Hackensack
Breitenbach T, Annunziato M, Borzì A (2018) On the optimal control of a random walk with jumps and barriers. Methodol Comput Appl Probab 20:435–462
Gaviraghi B, Annunziato M, Borzì A (2017) A Fokker–Planck based approach to control jump processes. In: Ehrhardt M, Günther M, ter Maten EJW (eds) Novel methods in computational finance, vol. 25 of mathematics in industry. Springer, Cham, pp 423–439
Göttlich S, Herty M, Schillen P (2016) Electric transmission lines: control and numerical discretization. Optim Control Appl Methods 37:980–995
Göttlich S, Teuber C (2018) Space mapping techniques for the optimal inflow control of transmission lines. Optim Methods Softw 33:120–139
Kiesel R, Schindlmayr G, Börger RH (2009) A two-factor model for the electricity forward market. Quant Financ 9:279–287
Klenke A (2008) Probability theory: a comprehensive course. Springer, London
Korn R, Korn E, Kroisandt G (2010) Monte Carlo methods and models in finance and insurance. Chapman & Hall/CRC Financial Mathematics Series, CRC Press, Boca Raton
La Marca M, Armbruster D, Herty M, Ringhofer C (2010) Control of continuum models of production systems. IEEE Trans Automat Control 55:2511–2526
LeVeque RJ (1990) Numerical methods for conservation laws, lectures in mathematics ETH Zürich. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel
Lucia JJ, Schwartz ES (2002) Electricity prices and power derivatives: evidence from the Nordic power exchange. Rev Deriv Res 5:5–50
Mikosch T (2009) Non-life insurance mathematics: an introduction with the Poisson process, 2nd edn. Universitext, Springer, Berlin
Roy S, Annunziato M, Borzì A, Klingenberg C (2018) A Fokker–Planck approach to control collective motion. Comput Optim Appl 69:423–459
Schwartz E, Smith JE (2000) Short-term variations and long-term dynamics in commodity prices. Manag Sci 46:893–911
Wagner A (2014) Residual demand modeling and application to electricity pricing. Energy J 35:45–73
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful for the support of the German Research Foundation (DFG) within the Project “Novel models and control for networked problems: from discrete event to continuous dynamics” (GO1920/4-1) and the BMBF within the Project ENets.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
6 Appendix
6 Appendix
The detailed calculation of the second moment of the JDP used in Sect. 4.1 is as follows:
For a better readability, we evaluate A, B, and C in expectation separately:
For the diffusion- and jump-driven quadratic term B, we calculate
Note that the expectation of the integral with respect to the Brownian motion is zero. It remains to calculate the expectation of the mixed summand C:
Again the expectation of the integral with respect to the Brownian motion vanishes. Note that the second moment of the time-dependent OUP is obtained by setting \(\gamma _{\tau _i} \equiv 0\) for all jump times \(\tau _i\).
Thus, it remains to calculate \({\mathbb {E}}\left[ \left( \sum _{i=1}^{N_t}\gamma _{\tau _i} e^{-\kappa (t-\tau _i)}\right) ^2\right] \). Note that \({\mathbb {E}}\left[ \gamma \right] ^2=\bar{\gamma }^2\).
We know from (Mikosch 2009, Prop. 2. 1. 16) that \(\tau _i \sim {\mathcal {U}}[0,t]\). Thus, we calculate
We can then deduce
It remains to compute the mixed-term expectation.
Thus, we have
Finally, the closed-form expression is
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Göttlich, S., Korn, R. & Lux, K. Optimal control of electricity input given an uncertain demand. Math Meth Oper Res 90, 301–328 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00186-019-00678-6
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00186-019-00678-6