Skip to main content
Log in

Performance of periodic time series models in forecasting

  • Published:
Empirical Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

The paper provides a comparison of alternative univariate time series models that are advocated for the analysis of seasonal data. Consumption and income series from (West-) Germany, United Kingdom, Japan and Sweden are investigated. The performance of competing models in forecasting is used to assess the adequacy of a specific model. To account for nonstationarity first and annual differences of the series are investigated. In addition, time series models assuming periodic integration are evaluated. To describe the stationary dynamics (standard) time invariant parametrizations are compared with periodic time series models conditioning the data generating process on the season. Periodic models improve the in-sample fit considerably but in most cases under study this model class involves a loss in ex-ante forecasting relative to nonperiodic models. Inference on unit-roots indicates that the nonstationary characteristics of consumption and income data may differ. For German and Swedish data forecasting exercises yield a unique recommendation of unit roots in consumption and income data which is an important (initial) result for multivariate analysis. Time series models assuming periodic integration are parsimonious to specify but often involve correlated one-step-ahead forecast errors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

First version received: April 1996/final version received: January 1998

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Herwartz, H. Performance of periodic time series models in forecasting. Empirical Economics 24, 271–301 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/s001810050055

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001810050055

Navigation