Skip to main content

Trend/Cycle Decomposition

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics
  • 68 Accesses

Abstract

The decomposition of economic time series is motivated by the idea that distinct forces account for long-term growth, for variation over a time frame associated with the business cycle, and though the seasons. While the latter is typically suppressed by ‘seasonal adjustment’, the issue of how to separate trend from cycle in series such as GDP has been hotly debated since the 1970s and remains unsettled. Surprisingly varied patterns follow from alternative approaches, some placing the bulk of variation into the cycle/trend following a smooth line, others attributing shifts in level to ‘permanent shocks’ to the trend.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 8,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Beveridge, S., and C.R. Nelson. 1981. A new approach to decomposition of economic time series into permanent and transitory components with particular attention to measurement of the business cycle. Journal of Monetary Economics 7: 151–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, P.K. 1987. The cyclical component of U.S. economic activity. Quarterly Journal of Economics 102: 797–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, A.C. 1985. Trends and cycles in macroeconomic time series. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 3: 216–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodrick, R.J., and E.C. Prescott. 1980. Postwar US business cycles: An empirical investigation, Working paper. Pittsburgh: Carnegie-Mellon University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodrick, R.J., and E.C. Prescott. 1997. Postwar U.S. business cycles: An empirical investigation. Journal of Money Credit and Banking 29: 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morley, J.C., C.R. Nelson, and E. Zivot. 2003. Why are the Beveridge–Nelson and unobserved-components decompositions of GDP so different? Review of Economics and Statistics 85: 235–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perron, P. 1989. The great crash, the oil price shock, and the unit root hypothesis. Econometrica 57: 1361–1401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Copyright information

© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Nelson, C.R. (2018). Trend/Cycle Decomposition. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2396

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics