Skip to main content
Log in

Players behind the scenes: common ownership in the hospital industry

  • Published:
Empirical Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Publicly traded firms being held by common owners may affect product prices set by these firms. Common ownership usually refers to a scenario when a few competing firms from the same industry and competing firms are also held by large common owners. Previous literature has studied the anticompetitive effects of common ownership in a few industries. In this paper, we use comprehensive data on 6200 hospitals in the U.S. from the American Hospital Association, Healthcare Cost Report Information System, and Wharton Research Data Services, and we test whether the presence of common ownership in the hospital industry affects hospitals’ charges. We find that common ownership in the hospital industry has anticompetitive effects on hospital prices. Our estimates are also robust to controlling for other compounding effects and under a range of alternative specifications of the model. Specifically, both lagged regressions and difference-in-differences strategies yield statistically significant positive impacts of common ownership on hospital prices, while economic magnitudes of the difference-in-differences results are much larger with more observations in analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. An institutional investor usually has a portfolio in which it holds stock shares of a number of competing firms in the same industry.

  2. For example, consumers could choose to drive if airline ticket prices are high and choose to hold cash if bank deposit interest rates are low.

  3. The hospital referral region (HRR) code is constructed by the Dartmouth Atlas Project. HRRs represent regional healthcare markets for tertiary medical care. Each HRR contains at least one hospital that performs major cardiovascular procedures and neurosurgery. HRRs were defined by assigning local hospital care markets to the region where the greatest proportion of major cardiovascular procedures were performed, with minor modifications to achieve geographic contiguity, a minimum population size of 120,000, and a high localization index.

  4. Psychiatric Solutions (94 hospitals) was acquired by the Universal Health Service (127 hospitals) in 2009. RehabCare Group was acquired by Kindred Healthcare in 2011. The $3.9 billion acquisition of Health Management (71 hospitals) by Community Health Systems (135 hospitals) occurred in 2014 (Dafny et al. 2016).

  5. The intuitive example of MHHIdelta as the measure of common ownership is illustrated in Table 4.

  6. The primary services include different types such as general medical and surgical, surgical, psychiatric, obstetrics and gynecology, rehabilitation, orthopedic, other specialty treatment, children’s psychiatric, acute long-term care, alcoholism, and other chemical dependency.

  7. According to Azar et al. (2018), following the financial crisis that began in 2007, Barclays tried for several months to strengthen its balance sheet. On March 16, 2009, Barclays had received a \(\$4\) billion bid by CVC Capital Partners for its iShares family of exchange-traded funds, along with an option to solicit competing offers. BlackRock announced a bid to acquire iShares’ parent division Barclays Global Investors (BGI) for \(\$13.5\) billion on June 11, 2009. The bid was successful, and the acquisition was formally completed in December 2009.

References

  • Amel-Zadeh A, Kasperk F, Schmalz M (2022) Mavericks, universal, and common owners: the largest shareholders of US public firms. In: CESifo Working Paper, No. 9926, Center for Economic Studies and ifo Institute (CESifo), Munich

  • Anton M, Ederer F, Gine M et al (2021) Innovation: the bright side of common ownership? SSRN Electron J. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3099578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antón M, Ederer F, Giné M et al (2023) Common ownership, competition, and top management incentives. J Polit Econ 131(5):1294–1355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azar J (2011) A new look at oligopoly: implicit collusion through portfolio diversification. SSRN Electron J. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1993364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azar J, Schmalz MC, Tecu I (2018) Anticompetitive effects of common ownership. J Finance 73(4):1513–1565. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azar J, Raina S, Schmalz M (2022) Ultimate ownership and bank competition. Financ Manage 51(1):227–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Backus M, Conlon C, Sinkinson M (2021) Common ownership in America: 1980–2017. Am Econ J: Microecon 13(3):273–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Backus M, Conlon C, Sinkinson M (2018) The common ownership hypothesis: theory and evidence. In: Brookings working paper

  • Backus M, Conlon C, Sinkinson M (2021b) Common ownership and competition in the ready-to-eat cereal industry (no. w28350). National Bureau of Economic Research

  • Bertrand M, Mullainathan S (2003) Enjoying the quiet life? Corporate governance and managerial preferences. J Polit Econ 111(5):1043–1075. https://doi.org/10.1086/376950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brav A, Jiang W, Kim H (2015) The real effects of hedge fund activism: productivity, asset allocation, and labor outcomes. Rev Financ Stud 28(10):2723–2769. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhv037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brav A, Jiang W, Li T et al (2020) Picking friends before picking (proxy) fights: how mutual fund voting shapes proxy contests. Tech. rep, Columbia Business School Research Paper, pp 16–18

  • Bresnahan TF, Salop SC (1986) Quantifying the competitive effects of production joint ventures. Int J Ind Organ 4(2):155–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-7187(86)90028-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connor RA, Feldman RD, Dowd BE (1998) The effects of market concentration and horizontal mergers on hospital costs and prices. Int J Econ Bus 5(2):159–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/13571519884495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornett MM, Hovakimian G, Palia D et al (2003) The impact of the manager–shareholder conflict on acquiring bank returns. J Bank Financ 27(1):103–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-4266(01)00210-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutler DM (1990) Empirical evidence on hospital delivery under prospective payment. Unpublished Paper

  • Cutler DM (1995) The incidence of adverse medical outcomes under prospective payment. Econometrica 63(1):29–50

  • Dafny L (2005) How do hospitals respond to price changes? Am Econ Rev 95(5):1525–1547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dafny L (2009) Estimation and identification of merger effects: an application to hospital mergers. J Law Econ 52(3):523–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dafny L, Ho K, Lee RS (2016) The price effects of cross-market hospital mergers (no. w22106). Tech. rep., National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w22106

  • Dewatripont M, Tirole J (1994) A theory of debt and equity: diversity of securities and manager-shareholder congruence. Q J Econ 109(4):1027–1054. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dranove D, Lindrooth R (2003) Hospital consolidation and costs: another look at the evidence. J Health Econ 22(6):983–997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2003.05.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dranove D, White WD (1994) Recent theory and evidence on competition in hospital markets. J Econ Manag Strategy 3(1):169–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaynor M, Vogt WB (2003) Competition among hospitals (no. w9471). National bureau of economic research. Document Object Identifier https://doi.org/10.3386/w9471

  • Gilman BH (2000) Hospital response to DRG refinements: the impact of multiple reimbursement incentives on inpatient length of stay. Health Econ 9(4):277–294

  • Gowrisankaran G, Nevo A, Town R (2015) Mergers when prices are negotiated: evidence from the hospital industry. Am Econ Rev 105(1):172–203. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20130223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gramlich J, Grundl S (2017) Estimating the competitive effects of common ownership. Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2017(029r1). https://doi.org/10.17016/feds.2017.029r1

  • Haas-Wilson D, Garmon C (2011) Hospital mergers and competitive effects: two retrospective analyses. Int J Econ Bus 18(1):17–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart OD (1979) On shareholder unanimity in large stock market economies. Econometrica: J Econom Soc 1057–1083. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911950

  • He JJ, Huang J (2017) Product market competition in a world of cross-ownership: evidence from institutional blockholdings. Rev Financ Stud 30(8):2674–2718. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhx028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janakiraman S, Radhakrishnan S, Tsang A (2010) Institutional investors, managerial ownership, and executive compensation. J Account Audit Finance 25(4):673–707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis MS, Pflum KE (2017) Hospital systems and bargaining power: evidence from out-of-market acquisitions. RAND J Econ 48(3):579–610. https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-2171.12186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mccahery JA, Sautner Z, Starks LT (2016) Behind the scenes: the corporate governance preferences of institutional investors. J Finance 71(6):2905–2932. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melnick G, Keeler E, Zwanziger J (1999) Market power and hospital pricing: are nonprofits different? Health Aff 18(3):167–173. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.18.3.167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotemberg J (1984) Financial transaction costs and industrial performance

  • Schmitt M (2017) Do hospital mergers reduce costs? J Health Econ 52:74–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lu Yao.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, M., Yao, L. Players behind the scenes: common ownership in the hospital industry. Empir Econ 66, 2277–2309 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-023-02519-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-023-02519-2

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation