Skip to main content
Log in

True or spurious long memory in the cryptocurrency markets: evidence from a multivariate test and other Whittle estimation methods

  • Published:
Empirical Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper applies a new proposed multivariate score-type test against spurious long memory to a group of cryptocurrency market returns. The test statistic developed by Sibbertsen et al. (J Econ 203(1): 33–49, 2018) is based on the multivariate local Whittle likelihood function and is proven to be consistent against the alternative two cases of random level shifts and smooth trends. We apply the test to the returns, absolute returns, and modified absolute returns. Overall, the recently developed test statistic fails to reject the null hypothesis of true long memory for most cryptocurrencies, except for the Stellar market. Therefore, applying the new test statistic supports the argument that the long memory in the cryptocurrency markets is real and is not a spurious one. Our results are further supported by applying other consistent local Whittle methods that allow for the estimation of the memory parameter by accounting for the presence of perturbations or low-frequency contaminations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

The data used for the study and codes are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Notes

  1. For recent literature on the cryptocurrencies, see Aslan and Sensoy (2020), Tran and Leirvik (2020), Long et al. (2020), Blau et al. (2020), Bariviera (2020), Noda (2020) and Werner et al. (2020) among many others.

  2. Similar to checking for a break in persistence, it is worth mentioning that some tests have also been proposed for checking for a change in mean to account for the case of long-memory processes. A review is given in Wenger et al. (2019). Examples of the tests fall under the CUSUM principle and include the CUSUM-LM test of Horváth and Kokoszka (1997) and Wang (2008), the (simple) CUSUM test based on fractionally differenced data by Wenger et al. (2018), and the CUSUM fixed bandwidth tests by Wenger and Leschinski (2019). We thank a referee of pointing at this kind of tests.

  3. Sibbertsen et al. (2018) show via simulations that the test works well in the low non-stationary range for d. The test is also proved not to be requiring Gaussianity, allowing for conditional heteroskedasticity, not requiring a precise specification of the low-frequency contamination and displaying high finite sample power results compared to competing tests (see Leccadito et al. 2015).

  4. Evidence provided by Diebold and Inoue (2001), Granger and Hyung (2004), Mikosch and Starica (2004), and Perron and Qu (2010) show that when the series are contaminated by smooth trends or mean shifts, they may display similar characteristics to those of long-memory processes.

  5. Estimators are provided in Appendix.

  6. Another approach that tries to approximate the perturbation by a constant rather than a polynomial is suggested by Hurvich and Ray (2003) who proposed the local polynomial Whittle estimator with noise.

  7. Hou and Perron (2014) provide an additional extension of the modified local Whittle estimator to account for both the perturbation and the low frequency contamination.

  8. Note that ADF test along with other standard unit roots methods have very low power under alternatives with fractional integration (Diebold and Rudebusch (1991); Hassler and Wolters (1994); Lee and Schmidt (1996)).

  9. Other proxies of volatility were used in the literature and include the log-squared returns ln(rt2 + a) as suggested by Stărică and Granger (2005) with the parameter a being close to zero such as 0.001.

  10. It is worth noting that a nonlinear process such as a Markov-switching model (MSW) and threshold autoregressive models can be mistaken for a long memory process (see Diebold and Inoue (2001) and Kuswanto and Sibbersten (2008). Studies conducted by Hyung and Franses (2005), Chung (2006), Baillie and Kapetanios (2007, 2008), and Kuswanto and Sibbersten (2008) have considered forecasting performance from models with both long memory and nonlinear features such as Smooth Transition Autoregressive (STAR), Self-Exciting Threshold Autoregressive (SETAR), Markov-switching (MSW) and artificial neural network. The proposed tests in this paper have some limitations in terms of accounting for nonlinearity in the data generating process. We thank a referee for pointing at this shortcoming.

  11. Other approaches that try to approximate the perturbation by a constant rather than a polynomial are, for example, suggested by Hurvich and Ray (2003) who proposed the local polynomial Whittle estimator with noise (LWN). This estimator is nested in the LPWN estimator if the polynomials are chosen of order zero.

References

  • Abuzayed B, Al-Fayoumi N, Charfeddine L (2018) Long range dependence in an emerging stock market’s sectors: volatility modelling and VAR forecasting. Appl Econ 50(23):2569–2599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Achard S, Gannaz I (2016) Multivariate wavelet whittle estimation in long-range dependence. J Time Ser Anal 37(4):476–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Achard S, Bassett DS, Meyer-Lindenberg A, Bullmore E (2008) Fractal connectivity of long-memory networks. Phys Rev E 77(3):036104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Yahyaee K, Walid M, Seong Min Y (2018) Efficiency, multifractality, and long-memory property of the Bitcoin market: a comparative analysis with stock, currency, and gold markets. Fin Res Lett 27:228–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews D, Sun WK (2004) Adaptive local polynomial whittle estimation of long-range dependence. Econometrica 72:569–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anyfantaki S, Arvanitis S, Topaloglou, N (2018) Diversification, integration and cryptocurrency market. Bank of Greece Working Paper No. 244.

  • Arteche J (2004) Gaussian semiparametric estimation in long memory in stochastic volatility and signal plus noise models. J Econom 119:131–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aslan A, Sensoy A (2020) Intraday efficiency-frequency nexus in the cryptocurrency markets. Fin Res Lett 35:101298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baillie RT, Kapetanios G (2007) Testing for neglected nonlinearity in long-memory models. J Bus Econ Stat 25:447–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baillie RT, Kapetanios G (2008) Nonlinear models for strongly dependent processes with financial applications. J Econom 147:60–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baillie RT, Morana C (2009) Modelling long memory and structural breaks in conditional variances: an adaptive FIGARCH approach. J Econ Dyn Control 33(8):1577–1592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balcilar M, Bouri E, Gupta R, Roubaud D (2017) Can volume predict bitcoin returns and volatility? A quantiles based approach. Econ Model 64:74–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bariviera AF (2017) The inefficiency of Bitcoin revisited: a dynamic approach. Econ Lett 161:1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bariviera AF (2020) One model is not enough: heterogeneity in cryptocurrencies’ multifractal profiles. Fin Res Lett 39:101649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bariviera A, Basgall M, Hasperue W, Naiouf M (2017) Some stylized facts of the bitcoin market. Phys A 484:82–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bariviera AF, Zunino L, Rosso OA (2018) An analysis of high-frequency cryptocurrencies prices dynamics using permutation-information-theory quantifiers. Chaos Interdiscip J Nonlinear Sci 28(7):075511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batten JA, Ellis C, Fetherston TA (2005) Return anomalies on the Nikkei: are they statistical illusions? Chaos Soliton Fract 23(4):1125–1136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batten JA, Ellis CA, Fethertson TA (2008) Sample period selection and long-term dependence: new evidence from the Dow Jones index. Chaos Soliton Fract 36(5):1126–1140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baur D, Lee A, Hong K (2015) Bitcoin: currency or investment? Working paper, SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2561183

  • Berkes I, Rorvath L, Kokoszka P, Shao QM (2006) On discriminating between long-range dependence and changes in mean. Ann Stat 34(3):1140–1165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau B (2017) Price dynamics and speculative trading in Bitcoin. Res Int Bus Fin 41:493–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau B, Griffith T, Whitby R (2020) Comovement in the cryptocurrency market. Econ Bull 40(1):448–455

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloomfield P (1973) An exponential model in the spectrum of a scalar time series. Biometrika 60:217–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouri E, Gupta R, Tiwari A, Roubaud D (2017) Does Bitcoin hedge global uncertainty? Evidence from wavelet based quantile-in-quantile regressions. Fin Res Lett 23:87–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caporale GM, Gil-Alana L, Plastun A (2018) Persistence in the cryptocurrency market. Res Int Bus Fin 46:141–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charfeddine L (2016) Breaks or long range dependence in the energy futures volatility: out-of-sample forecasting and VAR analysis. Econ Model 53:354–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charfeddine L, Guégan D (2012) Breaks or long memory behavior: an empirical investigation. Phys A 391(22):5712–5726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charfeddine L, Maouchi Y (2019) Are shocks on the returns and volatility of cryptocurrencies really persistent. Fin Res Lett 28:423–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheah ET, Mishra T, Parhi M, Zhang Z (2018) Long memory interdependency and inefficiency in Bitcoin markets. Econ Lett 167:18–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung S-K (2006) The out-of-sample forecasts of nonlinear long-memory models of the real exchange rate. Int J Fin Econ 11:355–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciaian P, Rajcaniova M, Kancs A (2018) Virtual relationships: Short-and long-run evidence from Bitcoin and altcoin markets. J Int Fin Mark Inst Money 52:173–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbet S, Lucey B, Yarovaya L (2018) Datestamping the Bitcoin and Ethereum bubbles. Fin Res Lett 26:81–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson J, Rambaccussing D (2015) A test of the long memory hypothesis based on self-similarity. J Time Ser Econ 7(2):115–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Deo RS, Hurvich CM (2001) On the log periodogram regression estimator of the memory parameter in long memory stochastic volatility models. Econ Theory 17:686–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diebold FX, Inoue A (2001) Long memory and regime switching. J Econ 105(1):131–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diebold FX, Rudebusch GD (1991) On the power of the Dickey Fuller test against fractional alternatives. Econ Lett 35(2):155–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolado JJ, Gonzalo J, Mayoral L (2005) What is what? A simple time-domain test of long-memory vs. structural breaks. Unpublished Manuscript, Department of Economics, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid.

  • Dwyer G (2015) The economics of Bitcoin and similar private digital currencies. J Finan Stabil 17:81–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyhrberg AH (2016) Bitcoin, gold and the dollar: a GARCH volatility analysis. Finan Res Lett 16:85–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frederiksen P, Nielsen FS, Nielsen M (2012) Local polynomial Whittle estimation of perturbed fractional processes. J Econ 167:426–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gil-Alana LA (2004) The use of the Bloomfield (1973) model as an approximation to ARMA processes in the context of fractional integration. Math Comput Model 39:429–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giraitis L, Kokoszka P, Leipus R, Teyssière G (2003) Rescaled variance and related tests for long memory in volatility and levels. J Econ 112(2):265–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gourieroux C, Jasiak J (2001) Memory and infrequent breaks. Econ Lett 70(1):29–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granger CW, Ding Z (1996) Varieties of long memory models. J Econ 73(1):61–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granger CW, Hyung N (2004) Occasional structural breaks and long memory with an application to the S&P 500 absolute stock returns. J Emp Fin 11(3):399–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haldrup N, Kruse R (2014) Discriminating between fractional integration and spurious long memory. Unpublished Manuscript, Department of Economics, University of Aarhus.

  • Hassler U, Wolters J (1994) On the power of unit roots against fractional integrated alternatives. Econ Lett 45(1):1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horváth L, Kokoszka P (1997) The effect of long-range dependence on change-point estimators. J Stat Plan Infer 64(1):57–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hou J, Perron P (2014) Modified local Whittle estimator for long memory processes in the presence of low frequency (and other) contaminations. J Econ 182:309–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurvich CM, Ray BK (2003) The local Whittle estimator of long-memory stochastic volatility. J Fin Econ 1:445–470

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurvich CM, Moulines E, Soulier P (2005) Estimating long memory in volatility. Econometrica 73:1283–1328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyung N, Franses PH (2005) Forecasting time series with long memory and level shifts. J Forecast 24:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iacone F (2010) Local Whittle estimation of the memory parameter in presence of deterministic components. J Time Ser Anal 31:37–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ji Q, Bourie E, Lau CK, Roubaud D (2019) Dynamic connectedness and integration in cryptocurrency markets. Int Rev Fin Anal 63:257–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang Y, Nie H, Ruan W (2018) Time-varying long-term memory in Bitcoin market. Fin Res Lett 25:280–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katsiampa P (2019) An empirical investigation of volatility dynamics in the cryptocurrency market. Res Int Bus Fin 50:322–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Künsch HR (1987) Statistical aspects of self-similar processes. Proc First World Congr Bernoulli Soc 1:67–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuswanto H, Sibbertsen P (2008) A study on “spurious long memory in nonlinear time series models. Appl Math Sci 2:2713–2734

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahmiri S, Bekiros S, Salvi A (2018) Long-range memory, distributional variation and randomness of Bitcoin volatility. Chaos Solitons Fract 107:43–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leccadito A, Rachedi O, Urga G (2015) True versus spurious long memory: Some theoretical results and a Monte Carlo comparison. Econ Rev 34(4):452–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee D, Schmidt P (1996) On the power of the KPSS test of stationarity against fractionally integrated alternatives. J Econ 73:285–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lobato IN (1999) A semiparametric two-step estimator in a multivariate long memory model. J Econ 90(1):129–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lobato IN, Savin NE (1998) Real and spurious long-memory properties of stock market data. J Bus Econ Stat 16(3):261–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Long H, Zaremba A, Demir E, Szczygielski JJ, Vasenin M (2020) Seasonality in the cross-section of cryptocurrency returns. Fin Res Lett 35:101566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu YK, Perron P (2010) Modeling and forecasting stock return volatility using a random level shift model. J Emp Fin 17(1):138–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey A, Perron P (2013) Memory parameter estimation in the presence of level shifts and deterministic trends. Econ Theory 29:1196–1237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mensi W, Al-Yahyaee KH, Kang SH (2019) Structural breaks and double long memory of cryptocurrency prices: a comparative analysis from Bitcoin and Ethereum. Fin Res Lett 29:222–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikosch T, Stărică C (2004) Nonstationarities in financial time series, the long range dependence, and the IGARCH effects. Rev Econ Stat 86(1):378–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mokni K, Ajmi AN (2021) Cryptocurrencies vs. US dollar: Evidence from causality in quantiles analysis. Econ Anal Policy 69:238–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mokni K, Ajmi AN, Bouri E, Vo XV (2020) Economic policy uncertainty and the Bitcoin-US stock nexus. J Multinatl Fin Manag 57:100656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadarajah S, Chu J (2017) On the inefficiency of Bitcoin. Econ Lett 150:6–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamoto S (2008) Bitcoin: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Unpublished Manuscript. http://pdos.csail.mit.edu/6.824/papers/bitcoin.pdf. Accessed on 26 March 2019

  • Nielsen MØ (2007) Local Whittle analysis of stationary fractional cointegration and the implied–realized volatility relation. J Bus Econ Stat 25(4):427–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noda A (2020) On the evolution of cryptocurrency market efficiency. Appl Econ Lett 28(6):433–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2020.1758617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohanissian A, Russell JR, Tsay RS (2008) True or spurious long memory? A new test. J Econ Stat 26(2):161–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Omane-Adjepong M, Alagidede P, Akosah N (2019) Wavelet time-scale persistence analysis of cryptocurrency market returns and volatility. Phys A 514:120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osterrieder J, Lorenz J, Strika M (2017) Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies-not for the faint-hearted. Int Fin Bank 4(1):56–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perron P, Qu Z (2010) Long-memory and level shifts in the volatility of stock market return indices. J Bus Econ Stat 28(2):275–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillip A, Jennifer C, Shelton P (2019) On long memory effects in the volatility measure of Cryptocurrencies. Fin Res Lett 28:95–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qu Z (2011) A test against spurious long memory. J Bus Econ Stat 29:423–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rambaccussing D, Mazibas M (2020) True versus spurious long memory in cryptocurrencies. J Risk Fin Manag 13(9):186

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson PM (1995) Gaussian semiparametric estimation of long range dependence. Ann Stat 23:1630–1661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson PM (2008) Multiple local Whittle estimation in stationary systems. Ann Stat 36(5):2508–2530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selmi R, Mensi W, Hammoudeh S, Bouoiyour M (2018) Is Bitcoin a hedge, a safe haven or a diversifier for oil price movements? A comparison with gold. Energy Econ 74:787–801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shimotsu K (2007) Gaussian semiparametric estimation of multivariate fractionally integrated processes. J Econ 137(2):277–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shimotsu K (2012) Exact local Whittle estimation of fractionally cointegrated systems. J Econ 169(2):266–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shimotsu K, Phillips PC (2005) Exact local Whittle estimation of fractional integration. Ann Stat 33(4):1890–1933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shimotsu K (2006) Simple (but effective) tests of long memory versus structural breaks. Department of Economics, Queen’s University. Working Paper 1101

  • Sibbertsen P, Leschinski CH, Holzhausen M (2018) A multivariate test against spurious long memory. J Econ 203(1):33–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soylu PK, Okur M, Çatıkkaş Ö, Altintig ZA (2020) Long memory in the volatility of selected cryptocurrencies: Bitcoin, ethereum and ripple. J Risk Fin Manag 13(6):107

    Google Scholar 

  • Stărică C, Granger C (2005) Nonstationarity in stock returns. Rev Econ Stat 87(3):503–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thies S, Molnár P (2018) Bayesian change point analysis of Bitcoin returns. Fin Res Lett 27:223–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiwari AK, Jana RK, Das D, Roubaud D (2018) Informational efficiency of bitcoin: an extension. Econ Lett 163:106–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tran VL, Leirvik T (2020) Efficiency in the markets of crypto-currencies. Fin Res Lett 35:101382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urquhart A (2016) The inefficiency of Bitcoin. Econ Lett 148:80–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urquhart A (2017) Price clustering in Bitcoin. Econ Lett 159:145–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandezande N (2017) Virtual currencies under EU anti-money laundering law. Comput Law Sec Rev 33:342–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang L (2008) Change-in-mean problem for long memory time series models with applications. J Stat Comput Simul 78(7):653–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wendt H, Roux SG, Jaffard S, Abry P (2009) Wavelet leaders and bootstrap for multifractal analysis of images. Sig Process 89(6):1100–1114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger K, Leschinski C, Sibbertsen P (2018) A simple test on structural change in long-memory time series. Econ Lett 163:90–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger K, Leschinski C, Sibbertsen P (2019) Change-in-mean tests in long-memory time series: a review of recent developments. AStA Adv Stat Anal 103(2):237–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger K, Leschinski C (2019) Fixed-bandwidth cusum tests under long memory. Econ Stat, Forthcoming.

  • Werner K, Bouri E, Tetsuya T (2020) Cryptocurrencies and equity funds: evidence from an asymmetric multifractal analysis. Phys A 545:123711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu J, Perron P (2014) Forecasting return volatility: Level shifts with varying jump probability and mean reversion. Int J Forecast 30(3):449–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yau CY, Davis RA (2012) Likelihood inference for discriminating between long memoryand change-point models. J Time Ser Anal 33(4):649–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yermack D (2015) Is Bitcoin a real currency? An economic appraisal. Handbook of digital currency. Academic Press, Cambridge, pp 31–43

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang YJ, Bouri E, Gupta R, Ma SJ (2020) Risk spillover between Bitcoin and conventional financial markets: an expectile-based approach. N Am J Econ Fin 55:101296

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research did not receive any grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AA did the coding, data analysis and empirical results. LG contributed to the literature, editing and supervision of the overall paper and helped in drafting the manuscript. KM contributed to the literature, editing, writing and supervision of the overall paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ata Assaf.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human participants or animals performed

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix: The local whittle estimator

Appendix: The local whittle estimator

The Whittle estimator is initially proposed by Künsch (1987) and then modified by Robinson (1995). It is used to estimate the long-memory parameter d. Ford ∈ (-1/2, 1/2), it is given by:

$$ \hat{d}_{{{\text{LW}}}} = \arg \min_{d} \left[ {\log \hat{G}(d) - \frac{2d}{m}\sum\limits_{j = 1}^{m} {\log \lambda_{j} } } \right] $$

where \(\hat{G}(d) = \frac{1}{m}\sum\nolimits_{j = 1}^{m} {\lambda_{j}^{2d} I_{T} ,y(\lambda_{j} ),I_{T} ,y} (\lambda_{j} ) = (2\pi T)^{ - 1} \left| {\sum\nolimits_{t = 1}^{T} {y_{t} e^{{it\lambda_{j} }} } } \right|^{2}\) is the periodogram of the series yt and \(\lambda_{j} = (\frac{2\pi j}{T})\) represent the Fourier frequencies.

Hou and Perron (2014) suggest a modified version and call it the modified local Whittle estimator. The local Whittle estimator is consistent in the case of two scenarios: the presence or absence of mean shifts and is given by:

$$ \hat{d}_{mLW} = \arg \min_{d,\theta } \left[ {\log \hat{G}(d,\theta ) + \frac{1}{m}\sum\limits_{j = 1}^{m} {\log \lambda^{ - 2d}_{j} + \theta \lambda_{j}^{ - 2} /T} } \right], $$

where \(\hat{G}(d,\theta ) = \frac{1}{m}\sum\nolimits_{j = 1}^{m} {\frac{{I_{T} ,y(\lambda_{j} )}}{{\lambda_{j}^{ - 2d} + \theta \lambda_{j}^{ - 2} /T}}}\) where θ reflects the scaling of the shifts. Hou and Perron (2014) prove the consistency and asymptotic normality of the modified local Whittle estimator for the case when m > T5/9.

Frederiksen et al. (2012) fit the following two polynomials: \(\log \phi_{y} \left( \lambda \right) \simeq \log G + h_{y} \left( {\theta_{y} ,\lambda } \right)\) and \(\log \phi_{w} \left( \lambda \right) \simeq \log G + \log \theta_{p} + h_{w} \left( {\theta_{w} ,\lambda } \right)\) to approximate the logarithms of \(\phi_{y} \left( \lambda \right)\) and \(\phi_{w} \left( \lambda \right)\) in\(f_{Z} \left( \lambda \right) = \phi_{y} \left( \lambda \right)\lambda^{ - 2d} + \phi_{w} \left( \lambda \right) + \phi_{u} \left( \lambda \right)\lambda^{ - 2} /T\). Here \(\theta = \left( {\theta^{\prime}_{y} ,\theta_{p} ,\theta^{\prime}_{w} } \right)^{^{\prime}}\), \(\theta_{p} = \phi_{w} \left( 0 \right)/\phi_{y} \left( 0 \right)\) is the long-run signal-to-noise ratio,\( {h}_{a}\left({\theta }_{a,}\lambda \right)=\sum_{r=1}^{{R}_{a}}{\theta }_{a,r}{\lambda }^{2r}\), and\( a \epsilon \left\{y,w\right\}\). Then, \({\widehat{G}}_{\mathrm{LPWN}}=\frac{1}{m}\sum_{j=1}^{m}\frac{{\lambda }_{j}^{2d}{I}_{\mathcal{z}}({\lambda }_{j})}{{g}_{\mathrm{LPWN}}(d,\theta ,{\lambda }_{j})}\). Then, \({g}_{\mathrm{LPWN}}\left(d,\theta ,\lambda \right)=\mathrm{exp}\left({h}_{y}\left({\theta }_{y},\lambda \right)\right)+{\theta }_{\rho }{\lambda }^{2d}\mathrm{exp}({h}_{w}\left({\theta }_{w},\lambda \right))\) and the estimator is given by:

$$\left({\widehat{d}}_{\mathrm{LPWN}},\widehat{\theta }\right)=\mathop{\mathrm{arg min}}\limits_{\mathit{d\epsilon }\left[{d}_{1},{d}_{2}\right],\mathit{\theta \epsilon }\Theta }{R}_{\mathrm{LPWN}}(d,\theta ),$$

where \(0<{d}_{1}<{d}_{2}<1\) is assumed to be stationary, and \(\Theta \) is a compact and convex set in \({\mathbb{R}}^{{R}_{y}}\times (0,\infty )\times {\mathbb{R}}^{{R}_{w}}\)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Assaf, A., Gil-Alana, L.A. & Mokni, K. True or spurious long memory in the cryptocurrency markets: evidence from a multivariate test and other Whittle estimation methods. Empir Econ 63, 1543–1570 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-021-02165-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-021-02165-6

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation