Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Trade and employment volatility of firms during the global financial crisis and post-crisis

  • Published:
Empirical Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There exists a theoretically ambiguous relationship between employment volatility and trade. Using a 2006–2015 firm-level unbalanced panel dataset for South Korea, this study investigates whether the globalization of firms transmits foreign shocks to domestic employment volatility and examines how foreign shocks that affect domestic employment are transmitted during both a crisis period and a post-crisis period. My empirical findings show that foreign demand shocks to domestic employment are transmitted through inter-firm exports during a post-crisis period window, while foreign demand and supply shocks on domestic employment are transmitted through intra-firm two-way trade and intra-firm imports during a crisis period window. These results show the asymmetric response of intra-firm trade and inter-firm trade to shocks during the crisis and post-crisis periods. Therefore, these results imply structural changes to the transmission channels of foreign shocks that impact domestic employment volatility after the crisis period. In addition, foreign direct investment has a positive effect on employment volatility. This implies higher employment volatility if a firm has overseas production plants, as presence abroad prompts the firm to substitute foreign workers for domestic workers. These findings may have significant implications for policy makers seeking to identify sources of labor market instability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Note: The first window indicates the period of 2006–2010, and the second window indicates the period of 2011–2015

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The dynamic panel model for employment growth model includes all firms during each window period.

  2. Kiyota et al.’s (2020) study held that the estimation of the firm fixed effect possibly results in the situation that all time-invariant effects are absorbed by the firm fixed effect.

References

  • Ackerberg DA, Caves K, Frazer G (2015) Identification properties of recent production function estimators. Econometrica 83:2411–2451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin RE (ed.) (2009) The great trade collapse: causes, consequences and prospects. Cepr

  • Bems R, Johnson RC, Yi KM (2010) Demand spillovers and the collapse of trade in the global recession. IMF Econ Rev 58:295–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bems R, Johnson RC, Yi KM (2011) Vertical linkages and the collapse of global trade. Am Econ Rev 101:308–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard O, Simon J (2001) The long and large decline in US output volatility. Brookings Pap Econ Act 1:135–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blundell R, Bond S (1998) Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. J Econom 87(1):115–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braconier H, Ekholm K (2000) Swedish multinationals and competition from high- and low-wage locations. Rev Int Econ 8:448–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buch CM, Döpke J, Strotmann H (2009) Does export openness increase firm-level output volatility? World Econom 32(4):531–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caselli F, Koren M, Lisicky M, Tenreyro S (2020) Diversification through trade. Q J Econ 135(1):449–502

  • Čede U, Chiriacescu B, Harasztosi P, Lalinsky T, Meriküll J (2018) Export characteristics and output volatility: comparative firm-level evidence for CEE countries. Rev World Econ 154(2):347–376

  • Choi MJ, Eum J (2019) Intra-firm and arm’s length trade during the global financial crisis: evidence from Korean manufacturing firms. Bank of Korea WP 2019–2013

  • Comin D, Mulani S (2006) Diverging trends in aggregate and firm volatility. Rev Econ Stat 88:374–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comin D, Philippon T (2005) The rise in firm-level volatility: Causes and consequences. NBER Macroecon Annu 20:167–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comin D, Groshen EL, Rabin B (2009) Turbulent firms, turbulent wages? J Monet Econ 56:109–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis SJ, Haltiwanger JC, Schuh S (1996) Job creation and destruction. MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Escaith H, Lindenberg N, Miroudot S (2010) International supply chains and trade elasticity in times of global crisis. World Trade Organization (Economic Research and Statistics Division) Staff Working Paper ERSD-2010–08

  • Kim M (2021) Firms’ globalization and wage elasticity of labor demand in South Korea. Appl Econ 53(7):820–829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiyota K, Matsuura T, Higuchi Y (2020) Multinationals, intra-firm trade and employment volatility. Can J Econ Rev Canadienne Econ 53:982–1015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konings J, Murphy A (2001) Do multinational enterprises substitute parent jobs for foreign ones? evidence from European firm level panel data. Evidence from European Firm Level Panel Data (No. 2972). CEPR Discussion Papers

  • Kurz C, Senses MZ (2016) Importing, exporting and firm-level employment volatility. J Int Econ 98:160–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos C, Ohnsorge F (2017) Arm’s-length trade: a source of post-crisis trade weakness [policy research working paper]. 8144 World Bank, Washington, DC

  • Lanz R, Miroudot S (2011) Intra-firm trade: patterns, determinants and policy implications. OECD trade policy Papers, No. 114 OECD Publishing

  • Levinsohn J, Petrin A (2003) Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservables. Rev Econ Stud 70:317–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McConnell MM, Perez-Quiros G (2000) Output fluctuations in the United States: What has changed since the early 1980s. Am Econ Rev 90:1464–1476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagengast AJ, Stehrer R (2016) The great collapse in value added trade. Rev Int Econ 24:392–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik D (1997) Has globalization gone too far? Institute for International Economics, Washington, DC

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rovigatti G, Mollisi V (2018) Theory and practice of total-factor productivity estimation: The control function approach using Stata. Stand Genomic Sci 18(3):618–662

    Google Scholar 

  • Senses MZ (2010) The effects of offshoring on the elasticity of labor demand. J Int Econ 81:89–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter MJ (2001) International trade and labor-demand elasticities. J Int Econ 54:27–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Beveren I (2012) Total factor productivity estimation: A practical review. J Econ Surv 26:98–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vannoorenberghe G (2012) Firm-level volatility and exports. J Int Econ 86:57–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge JM (2009) On estimating firm-level production functions using proxy variables to control for unobservables. Econ Lett 104:112–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yi KM (2009) The collapse of global trade: The role of vertical specialization. In: Baldwin R, Evenett S (eds) The Collapse of Global Trade, Murky Protectionism, and the Crisis: Recommendations for the G20. CEPR, London, pp 45–48

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author is grateful to the participants of the 94th Annual Conference and 16th International Conference of the Western Economic Association International, 2019 Korea's Allied Economic Associations Annual Meeting, and 2019 National Balanced Development Seminar for their comments and suggestions. The author thanks the reviewers for their thoughtful suggestions and insights.

Funding

This work was supported by the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2019S1A5A8034490).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Minjung Kim.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by the author.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This research uses Remote Access Service of Microdata Integrated Service (MDIS, RAS19051603), provided by Statistics of Korea for data analysis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, M. Trade and employment volatility of firms during the global financial crisis and post-crisis. Empir Econ 62, 2091–2109 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-021-02096-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-021-02096-2

Keywords

JEL Classifications

Navigation