Skip to main content
Log in

Price relationship among domestic and imported beef products in South Korea

  • Published:
Empirical Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines a price relationship among domestic South Korean (hereafter, Korea) premium beef, “Hanwoo,” non-premium beef, “Yukwoo,” and imported beef from the USA and Australia. In our study, we utilize monthly data from Korea Institute for Animal Products Quality Evaluation and the Global Trade Atlas from the period between January 2009 and December 2016. We model a directed acyclic graph and employ the Granger causality test and variance decomposition methods. The results show that based on the price relationship, the imported beef products compete with Yukwoo, and not with Hanwoo. Our findings imply that Korean consumers consider Hanwoo to be different from imported beef.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Source: Korea Trade Statistics Promotion Institute

Fig. 2

Source: Korea Trade Statistics Promotion Institute

Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. www.kmta.or.kr/html/sub6-1.html?scode=11.

  2. “Yukwoo” in Korean means dairy beef cattle. Dependent almost entirely on Holstein bull calves, it accounts for about 10% of the domestic beef production in Korea.

  3. The stone index utilized by the linear approximation of AIDS causes certain econometric and theoretical problems (Henningsen 2017).

  4. http://www.ekapepia.com/home/homeIndex.do.

References

  • Awokuse TO, Xie R (2015) Does agriculture really matter for economic growth in developing countries? Can J Agric Econ/Revue canadienne d’agroeconomie 63(1):77–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bessler DA, Akleman DG (1998) Farm prices, retail prices, and directed graphs: results for pork and beef. Am J Agric Econ 80(5):1144–1149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen B, Saghaian SH (2016) Market integration and price transmission in the world rice export markets. J Agric Resour Econ 41(3):444

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer GP (2015) The Johansen tests for cointegration. White Paper

  • Engle RF, Granger CW (1987) Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econom J Econ Soc 55:251–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Granger CW (1969) Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econom J Econom Soc 37:424–438

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassanzoy N, Ito S, Isoda H, Amekawa Y (2017) Cointegration and spatial price transmission among wheat and wheat-flour markets in Afghanistan. Appl Econ 49(30):2939–2955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes DJ, Wahl TI, Williams GW (1990) Testing restrictions on a model of Japanese meat demand. Am J Agric Econ 72(3):556–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henningsen A (2017) Demand analysis with the “Almost Ideal Demand System” in R: Package micEconAids. https://rdrr.io/cran/micEconAids/f/inst/doc/micEconAids_vignette.pdf

  • Hur SJ, Park GB, Joo ST (2008) A comparison of the meat qualities from the Hanwoo (Korean native cattle) and Holstein steer. Food Bioprocess Technol 1(2):196–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansen S (1988) Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. J Econ Dyn Control 12(2–3):231–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansen S, Juselius K (1990) Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration—with applications to the demand for money. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 52(2):169–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John A (2013) Price relations between export and domestic rice markets in Thailand. Food Policy 42:48–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim G, Mark T (2017) Impacts of corn price and imported beef price on domestic beef price in South Korea. Agric Food Econ 5(1):5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim BC, Rhee MS, Ryu YC, Imm JY, Koh KC (2001) Early postmortem processing conditions on meat quality of Hanwoo (Korean Native Cattle) beef during storage. Asian-Aust J Anim Sci 14(12):1763–1768

  • KREI (2017) Agriculture Outlook 2017 Korea. Korea Rural Economic Institute (KREI), Seoul

    Google Scholar 

  • KREI (2018) Agriculture Outlook 2018 Korea. Korea Rural Economic Institute (KREI), Seoul

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearl J (1995) Causal diagrams for empirical research. Biometrika 82(4):669–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perron P (1989) The great crash, the oil price shock, and the unit root hypothesis. Econom J Econom Soc 57:1361–1401

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips PC, Perron P (1988) Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika 75(2):335–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapsomanikis G, Hallam D, Conforti P (2006) Market integration and price transmission in selected food and cash crop markets of developing countries: review and applications. In: Agricultural commodity markets and trade, pp 187–217

  • Ryan T, Cheetham A (2017) The Korean beef market: insights and prospects from an Australian perspective. Meat & Livestock Australia Market Information Report, 6(11)

  • Saghaian SH, Hasan MF, Reed MR (2002) Overshooting of agricultural prices in four Asian economies. J Agric Appl Econ 34(1):95–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seok JH, Kim G, Reed MR, Kim S-E (2018) The impact of avian influenza on the Korean egg market: who benefited? J Policy Model 40(1):151–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zivot E, Andrews DWK (2002) Further evidence on the great crash, the oil-price shock, and the unit-root hypothesis. J Bus Econ Stat 20(1):25–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jun Ho Seok.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors whose names are listed immediately below certify that they have NO affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or nonfinancial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moon, H., Seok, J.H. Price relationship among domestic and imported beef products in South Korea. Empir Econ 61, 3541–3555 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-021-02014-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-021-02014-6

Keywords

Navigation