Abstract
We propose measuring business conditions via estimating a smooth function of time that serves as a common factor for explaining the comovement of economic indicators across the occurred business cycles. This smooth measure is useful for reducing the noises in assessing the state of business conditions, and can be easily established using mixed-frequency indicators and updated in real time. We also conduct an empirical study to show its usefulness in real data.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability Statement
The data used in this study are publicly available. (See Table 1.)
Notes
See also Sect. 5.2 for the estimated \(\ell _i(t)\)’s for a set of indicators for the U.S. economy.
References
Altissimo F, Cristadoro R, Forni M, Lippi M, Veronese G. New Eurocoin: tracking economic growth in real time. Rev Econ Stat. 2010;92:1024–34.
Andreou E, Ghysels E, Kourtellos A. Forecasting with mixed-frequency data. In: Clements M, Hendry D, editors. Oxford handbook of economic forecasting. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011.
Aruoba SB, Diebold FX. Real-time macroeconomic monitoring: real activity, inflation, and interactions. Am Econ Rev Pap Proc. 2010;100:20–4.
Aruoba SB, Diebold FX, Scotti C. Real-time measurement of business conditions. J Bus Econ Stat. 2009;27:417–27.
Bai J, Ng S. Large dimensional factor analysis. Found Trends Econ. 2008;3:89–163.
Bańbura M, Giannone D, Moduhno M, Reichlin L. Now-casting and the real-time data flow. In: Elliott G, Granger C, Timmermann A, editors. Handbook of economic forecasting. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2013.
Baxter M, King RG. Measuring business cycles: approximate band-pass filters for economic time series. Rev Econ Stat. 1999;81:575–93.
Beber A, Brandt MW, Luisi M. Distilling the macroeconomic news flow. J Financ Econ. 2015;117:489–507.
Berge TJ, Jordá Ó. Evaluating the classification of economic activity into recessions and expansions. Am Econ J Macroecon. 2011;3:246–77.
Brave S, Butters A. Monitoring financial stability: a financial conditions index approach. Econ Perspect. 2011;35:22–43.
Burns AF, Mitchell WC. Measuring business cycles. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research; 1946.
Camacho M, Martinez-Martin J. Real-time forecasting US GDP from small-scale factor models. Empir Econ. 2014;47:347–64.
Canova F. Detrending and business cycle facts. J Monet Econ. 1998;41:475–512.
Christiano LJ, Fitzgerald TJ. The band pass filter. Int Econ Rev. 2003;44:435–65.
Cogley T, Nason JM. Effects of the Hodrick–Prescott filter on trend and difference stationary time series—implications for business cycle research. J Econ Dyn Control. 1995;19:253–78.
Cogley T. Data filters. In: Durlauf SN, Blume LE, editors. The new Palgrave dictionary of economics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2008.
Cooley TF, Prescott EC. Economic growth and business cycles. In: Cooley TF, editor. Front Bus Cycle Res. Princeton: University Press; 1995.
Evans CL, Liu CT, Pham-Kanter G. The 2001 recession and the Chicago fed national activity index: identifying business cycle turning points. Econ Perspect. 2002;3Q:26–43.
Evans MDD. Where are we now? Real time estimates of the macro economy. Int J Central Ban. 2005;1:127–75.
Fan J, Gijbels I. Local polynomial modelling and its applications. London: Chapman & Hall; 1996.
Foroni C, Marcellino M. A comparison of mixed frequency approaches for nowcasting Euro area macroeconomic aggregates. Int J Forecast. 2014;30:554–68.
Galvão AB. Changes in predictive ability with mixed frequency data. Int J Forecast. 2013;29:395–410.
Ghysels E, Sinko A, Valkanov R. MIDAS regressions: further results and new directions. Econ Rev. 2006;26:53–90.
Giannone D, Reichlin L, Small D. Nowcasting: the real time informational content of macroeconomic data. J Monet Econ. 2008;55:665–76.
Hamilton J. Why you should never use the Hodrick–Prescott filter. Rev Econ Stat. 2018;100:831–43.
Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J. The elements of statistical learning- data mining, inference, and prediction. New York: Springer; 2009.
Hodrick RJ, Prescott EC. Business cycles: an empirical investigation, postwar U.S. J Money Credit Bank. 1997;29:1–16.
Kaiser R, Maravall A. Measuring business cycles in economic time series. New York: Springer; 2001.
Marcellino M, Schumacher C. Factor MIDAS for nowcasting and forecasting with ragged-edge data: a model comparison for German GDP. Oxf Bull Econ Stat. 2010;72:518–49.
Mariano RS, Murasawa Y. A new coincident index of business cycles based on monthly and quarterly series. J Appl Econ. 2003;18:427–43.
Mariano RS, Murasawa Y. A coincident index, common factors, and monthly real GDP. Oxf Bull Econ Stat. 2010;72:27–46.
Stock JH, Watson MW. New indexes of coincident and leading economic indicators. NBER Macroecon Annu. 1989;4:351–94.
Stock JH, Watson MW. A probability model of the coincident economic indicators. In: Lahiri K, Moore G, editors. Leading economic indicators: new approaches and forecasting records. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1991. p. 63–89.
Stock JH, Watson MW. Forecasting inflation. J Monet Econ. 1999a;44:293–335.
Stock JH, Watson MW. Business cycle fluctuations in US macroeconomic time series. In: Taylor JB, Woodford M, editors. Handbook of macroeconomics. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1999b.
Stock JH, Watson MW. Macroeconomic forecasting using diffusion indexes. J Bus Econ Stat. 2002;20:147–62.
Suits D, Mason A, Chan L. Spline functions fitted by standard regression methods. Rev Econ Stat. 1978;60:132–9.
Thorsrud LA. Words are the new numbers: a newsy coincident index of the business cycle. J Bus Econ Stat. 2020;38:393–409.
Wallis KF. Forecasting with an econometric model: the ‘ragged edge’ problem. J Forecast. 1986;5:1–13.
Acknowledgements
The author is indebted to the Editor, Robert M. Kunst, and two anonymous referees for their comments and suggestions that led to substantial improvements in this paper. The author also thanks the participants of the 2017 Annual Conference of the International Association of Applied Econometrics and the 2017 European Meeting of the Econometric Society for helpful comments on an earlier version of this paper.
Funding
This study was funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology in Taiwan (MOST103-2410-H-001-009) and supported by the Center for Research in Econometric Theory and Applications (Grant No. 109L9002) from the Featured Areas Research Center Program within the framework of the Higher Education Sprout Project by the Ministry of Education (MOE) in Taiwan and MOST 109-2634-F-002-045.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by the author.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, YT. A mixed-frequency smooth measure for business conditions. Empir Econ 61, 1699–1724 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-020-01937-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-020-01937-w