Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Socioeconomic factors and happiness: evidence from self-reported mental health data

  • Published:
Empirical Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigates socioeconomic and health-related factors that contribute to well-being in America, partially replicating the analysis of Oswald and Wu (Rev Econ Stat 93(4):1118–1134, 2011) using many more years’ worth of data. In particular, data from more than 2 decades of Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System surveys were used to investigate to what degree various factors explain the self-reported number of bad mental health days in the past month. We find that self-reported mental health changes most with age, employment situation, and marital status. Mental health was worse when income was less than peer group average or weight was more than peer group average, and the strength of these effects differed by gender. Because data spanned several decades, we were able to estimate generational effects and time trends, unlike otherwise similar analyses of BRFSS data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Recently, Layard (2013) has showed that mental health is highly correlated with other measures of life satisfaction.

  2. That is, symptoms relating to anxiety, including: having trouble sleeping, thinking, or remembering; feeling overwhelmed; and having shortness of breath

  3. Recently, however, Stevenson and Wolfers (2008) have cast doubt on the Easterlin paradox by providing evidence that absolute income indeed matters on its own.

  4. This is reminiscent of the U-bend shape reported by others (see, e.g., The Economist, December 18–25, 2010); the earlier peak that we observe may be due at least in part to a different definition of utility. Indeed, Oswald and Wu (2011) observed the peak in the mid-thirties for the mental health response and in the fifties for the life satisfaction response.

  5. http://news.gallup.com/poll/122453/understanding-gallup-uses-cantril-scale.aspx

References

  • Abel AB (1990) Asset prices under habit formation and catching up with the Joneses. Am Econ Rev 80(2):38–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Alesina A, Di Tella R, MacCulloch R (2004) Inequality and happiness: are Europeans and Americans different? J Pub Econ 88(9–10):2009–2042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bautista A, Chen C, Raisch D (2016) PCN151—impact of exercise on mental-health related quality of life among cancer survivors who have completed treatment using Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (Brfss) 2014. Value Health 19:A161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bridges S, Disney R (2010) Debt and depression. J Health Econ 29(3):388–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantril H (1965) The patterns of human concern. Rutgers University Press, New Brunsick

    Google Scholar 

  • Castellanos E, Nikpay S (2017) Self-reported health and access to care among cancer caregivers: analysis of the 2015 behavioral risk factor surveillance system (BRFSS). J Clin Oncol 35:6573–6573. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2017.35.15_suppl.6573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark AE, Oswald AJ (1994) Unhappiness and unemployment. Econ J 104(424):648–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark AE, Oswald AJ (1996) Satisfaction and comparison income. J Pub Econ 61(3):359–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark A, Fleche S, Layard R, Powdthavee N, Ward G (2017) The key determinants of happiness and misery. Discussion Paper 1485, CEP

  • Cohen S, Janicki-Deverts D (2012) Who’s stressed? Distributions of psychological stress in the United States in probability samples from 1983, 2006, and 2009. J Appl Soc Psychol 42(6):1320–1334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly MC, Wilson DJ (2006) Keeping up with the Joneses and staying ahead of the Smiths: evidence from suicide data. Working Paper Series 2006-12, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco

  • Deaton A (2008) Income, aging, health and wellbeing around the world: evidence from the gallup world poll. J Econ Perspect 22:53–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener E, Emmons R, Larsen R, Griffin S (1985) The satisfaction with life scale. J Personal Assess 49:71–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dooley D, Prause J, Ham-Rowbottom K (2000) Underemployment and depression: longitudinal relationships. J Health Soc Behav 41:421–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drentea P (2000) Age, debt and anxiety. J Health Soc Behav 41(4):437–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duesenberry J (1949) Income, savings and the theory of consumer behavior. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Dynan KE, Ravina E (2007) Increasing income inequality, external habits, and self-reported happiness. Am Econ Rev 97(2):226–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin RA (1974) Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. Nations Househ Econ Growth 89:89–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg D, Golberstein E, Hunt J (2009) Mental health and academic success in college. BE J Econ Anal Policy 9(1 – Article 40):1–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrer-i Carbonell A (2005) Income and well-being: an empirical analysis of the comparison income effect. J Pub Econ 89(5–6):997–1019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey BS, Stutzer A (2002) What can economists learn from happiness research? J Econ Lit 40(2):402–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gathergood J (2012) Debt and depression: causal links and social norm effects. Econ J 122(563):1094–1114. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2012.02519.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg D, Blackwell B (1970) Psychiatric illness in general practice: a deteailed studying using a new method of case identification. Br Med J 2(5707):439–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenleaf A, Roessger K (2017) Effectiveness of care farming on veterans’ life satisfaction, optimism, and perceived loneliness. J Humanis Couns 56:86–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamermesh DS, Abrevaya J (2013) Beauty is the promise of happiness? Eur Econ Rev 64(C):351–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoeymans N, Garssen AA, Westert GP, Verhaak PF (2004) Measuring mental health of the dutch population: a comparison of the ghq-12 and the mhi-5. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2(1):23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hojman DA, Miranda l, Ruiz-Tagle J (2016) Debt trajectories and mental health. Soc Sci Med 167(C):54–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Layard R (2013) Mental health: the new frontier for labour economics. IZA J Lab Policy 2(1):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40173-015-0043-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Layard R, Mayraz G, Nickell S (2008) The marginal utility of income. J Pub Econ 92(8–9):1846–1857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ljungqvist L, Uhlig H (2000) Tax policy and aggregate demand management under catching up with the joneses. Am Econ Rev 90(3):356–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lumley T, Diehr P, Emerson S, Chen L (2002) The importance of the normality assumption in large public health data sets. Ann Rev Pub Health 23:151–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe CJ, Thomas KJ, Brazier JE, Coleman P (1996) Measuring the mental health status of a population: a comparison of the ghq12 and the sf36 (mhi5). Br J Psychiatry 169(4):517521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miech R, Shanahan M (2000) Socioeconomic status and depression over the life course. J Health Soc Behav 41(2):162–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montagnoli A, Moro M (2014) Everybody hurts: banking crises and individual wellbeing. Working Papers 2014010, The University of Sheffield, Department of Economics

  • Moriarty D, Zack M, Holt J, Chapman D, Safran M (2009) Geographic patterns of frequent mental distress: U.S. adults, 1993–2001 and 2003–2006. Am J Prevent Med 36(6):497–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neugarten B, Havighurst R, Tobin S (1961) The measurement of life satisfaction. J Gerontol 16:134–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oswald AJ, Wu S (2011) Well-being across America. Rev Econ Stat 93(4):1118–1134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prause J, Dooley D, Huh J (2009) Income volatility and psychological depression. Am J Commun Psychol 43(1–2):57–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rentfrow PJ, Mellander C, Florida R (2009) Happy states of America: A state-level analysis of psychological, economic, and social well-being. J Res Personal 43(6):1073–1082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.08.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson B, Wolfers J (2008) Economic growth and subjective well-being: reassessing the Easterlin paradox. Brook Pap Econ Act 39(1 (Spring):1–102

  • Stutzer A (2004) The role of income aspirations in individual happiness. J Econ Behav Organ 54(1):89–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Twenge J (2017) Have smartphones destroyed a generation? The Atlantic September

  • Twenge J (2014) Time period and birth cohort differences in depressive symptoms in the U.S., 1982–2013. Soc Indic Res 121(2):437–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ware J, Sherbourne C (1992) The mos 36-item short-form health survey (sf-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30:473–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams D (1990) Socioeconomic differentials in health: a review and redirection. Soc Psychol Q 53:81–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winkelmann L, Winkelmann R (1998) Why are the unemployed so unhappy? Evidence panel data. Economica 65(257):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood V, Wylie M, Sheafor B (1969) An analysis of a short self-report measure of life satisfaction: correlation with rater judgments. J Gerontol 24:465–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclaimer

The views expressed are those of the authors’ and do not represent the views of the US Government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacek Rothert.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

7 Appendix

7 Appendix

 

Coef

Std.Err.

p value

   Female

0.830

0.007

0.000

   Physical health

0.236

0.000

0.000

   Pre-WWII

\(-\) 0.329

0.013

0.000

Health plan

   No coverage

0.507

0.010

0.000

   Don’t know

\(-\) 0.068

0.070

0.336

   Refused

\(-\) 0.326

0.103

0.002

Marital status

   Divorced

0.796

0.009

0.000

   Widowed

0.429

0.011

0.000

   Separated

2.134

0.019

0.000

   Never married

0.277

0.010

0.000

   Member of unmarried couple

0.757

0.019

0.000

   Refused

0.373

0.058

0.000

Education

   Elementary

0.056

0.072

0.435

   Some high school

0.287

0.071

0.000

   High school graduate

\(-\) 0.044

0.070

0.528

   Some college

0.092

0.071

0.194

   College graduate

\(-\) 0.245

0.071

0.001

   Refused

\(-\) 0.104

0.104

0.316

Race

   Black

\(-\) 0.792

0.011

0.000

   Hispanic

\(-\) 0.684

0.013

0.000

   Other

\(-\) 0.072

0.013

0.000

   Refused or didn’t know

0.156

0.031

0.000

Employment

   Self-employed

0.051

0.011

0.000

   Out of work for \(\ge \) 1 year

2.246

0.020

0.000

   Out of work for < 1 year

1.773

0.019

0.000

   Homemaker

0.085

0.012

0.000

   Student

0.291

0.020

0.000

   Retired

0.285

0.010

0.000

   Unable to work

4.138

0.014

0.000

Refused

0.497

0.055

0.000

Relative income

   Male

\(-\) 0.537

0.007

0.000

   Female

\(-\) 0.766

0.006

0.000

   Male—unknown

0.345

0.023

0.000

   Female—unknown

0.309

0.015

0.000

   Male—hidden

\(-\) 0.174

0.019

0.000

   Female—hidden

\(-\) 0.524

0.015

0.000

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rothert, J., VanDerwerken, D. & White, E. Socioeconomic factors and happiness: evidence from self-reported mental health data. Empir Econ 58, 3101–3123 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-019-01655-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-019-01655-y

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation