Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamics of the European sovereign bonds and the identification of crisis periods

  • Published:
Empirical Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We develop an empirical model of heterogeneous agents to study the dynamics of the European sovereign bonds market. Agents make use of different information from the CDS market and historical price movements of the sovereign bonds for their trading decisions. Subject to the perceived sovereign risk, agents exhibit changing trading behaviors in high-risk periods and tranquil times. To compare the ability of our model to identify crises periods, we also run a generalized sup ADF test as suggested in Phillips et al. (Int Econ Rev 56(4):1043–1078, 2015). Our results indicate that the smooth transition regression framework may provide additional valuable information regarding the timing of crisis events.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For the four level time series, \(\mathrm{BS}_\mathrm{Ge}\), \(\mathrm{BS}_\mathrm{Gr}\), \(\mathrm{CDS}_\mathrm{Ge}\) and \(\mathrm{CDS}_\mathrm{Gr}\), unit root tests already suggest that all these time series are I(1) processes.

  2. While the extant literature mainly uses I(0) process variables as transition variables such that spurious regressions could be avoided in the linearity test, Lundbergh et al. (2003) propose a two-regime model with a non-stationary transition variable. Battaglia and Protopapas (2011, 2012) propose a procedure based on genetic algorithms to evaluate time-varying multi-regimes models with non-stationary transition variables and apply in the investigation of global warming. In our case, the German and Greek CDS spreads are I(1) processes. We verify that the residuals of each linearity regression are I(0) processes, and therefore, the concern is eased for the spurious regression in the linearity test.

  3. Given the high persistence of \(\mathrm{ERR}_{i,t}\) statements about statistical significance of the estimated coefficients have to be taken with caution, since t-statistics may be unreliable, see, for instance, Phillips and Lee (2013).

References

  • Arghyrou MG, Kontonikas A (2012) The emu sovereign-debt crisis: fundamentals, expectations and contagion. J Int Financ Mark Inst Money 22(4):658–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badaoui S, Cathcart L, El-Jahel L (2013) Do sovereign credit default swaps represent a clean measure of sovereign default risk? A factor model approach. J Bank Finance 37(7):2392–2407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battaglia F, Protopapas M (2011) Time-varying multi-regime models fitting by genetic algorithms. J Time Ser Anal 32(3):237–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battaglia F, Protopapas M (2012) An analysis of global warming in the alpine region based on nonlinear nonstationary time series models. Stat Methods Appl 21(3):315–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beirne J, Fratzscher M (2013) The pricing of sovereign risk and contagion during the European sovereign debt crisis. J Int Money Finance 34:60–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blommestein, HJ, Eijffinger SCW, Qian Z (2012) Animal spirits in the euro area sovereign cds market (2012). CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP9092. SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2153542

  • Caspi I (2013) Rtadf: testing for bubbles with eviews. MPRA Paper 58791, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 06 Sep 2014

  • Chen Z, Huang W, Zheng H (2018) Estimating heterogeneous agents behavior in a two-market financial system. J Econ Interact Coord 13(3):491–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiarella C, ter Ellen S, He X-Z, Wu E (2015) Fear or fundamentals? Heterogeneous beliefs in the European sovereign CDS market. J Empir Finance 32:19–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connolly R, Stivers C, Sun L (2005) Stock market uncertainty and the stock-bond return relation. J Financ Quant Anal 40(1):161–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Jong E, Verschoor WF, Zwinkels RC (2009) Behavioural heterogeneity and shift-contagion: evidence from the Asian crisis. J Econ Dyn Control 33(11):1929–1944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dieci R, Westerhoff F (2010) Heterogeneous speculators, endogenous fluctuations and interacting markets: a model of stock prices and exchange rates. J Econ Dyn Control 34(4):743–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffie D (1999) Credit swap valuation. Financ Anal J 55(1):73–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escribano Á, Jordá O (2001) Testing nonlinearity: decision rules for selecting between logistic and exponential star models. Span Econ Rev 3(3):193–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frijns B, Zwinkels RC (2016) Speculation in European sovereign debt markets. SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2725975 or https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2725975

  • Ghosh AR, Ostry JD, Qureshi MS (2013) Fiscal space and sovereign risk pricing in a currency union. J Int Money Finance 34:131–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homm U, Breitung J (2012) Testing for speculative bubbles in stock markets: a comparison of alternative methods. J Financ Econom 10(1):198–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang W, Chen Z (2014) Modeling regional linkage of financial markets. J Econ Behav Organ 99:18–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaramillo L, Weber A (2013) Bond yields in emerging economies: it matters what state you are in. Emerg Markets Rev 17:169–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leppin JS, Reitz S (2016) The role of a changing market environment for credit default swap pricing. Int J Finance Econ 21(3):209–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lof M (2012) Heterogeneity in stock prices: a STAR model with multivariate transition function. J Econ Dyn Control 36(12):1845–1854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundbergh S, Teräsvirta T (1998) Modeling economic high frequency time series with star garch models. Stockholm School of Economics WP No. 291

  • Lundbergh S, Teräsvirta T, van Dijk D (2003) Time-varying smooth transition autoregressive models. J Bus Econ Stat 21(1):104–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palladini G, Portes R (2011) Sovereign CDS and bond pricing dynamics in the euro-area. Working Paper 17586, National Bureau of Economic Research

  • Phillips PC, Lee JH (2013) Predictive regression under various degrees of persistence and robust long-horizon regression. J Econom 177(2):250–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips PC, Shi S-P, Yu J (2015) Testing for multiple bubbles: historical episodes of exuberance and collapse in the s&p 500. Int Econ Rev 56(4):1043–1078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reitz S, Westerhoff F (2007) Commodity price cycles and heterogeneous speculators: a star-garch model. Empir Econ 33(2):231–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reitz S, Rülke J-C, Stadtmann G (2012) Nonlinear expectations in speculative markets—evidence from the ecb survey of professional forecasters. J Econ Dyn Control 36(9):1349–1363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt N, Westerhoff F (2014) Speculative behavior and the dynamics of interacting stock markets. J Econ Dyn Control 45:262–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teräsvirta T (1994) Specification, estimation, and evaluation of smooth transition autoregressive models. J Am Stat Assoc 89(425):208–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Teräsvirta T (1998) Modelling economic relationships with smooth transition regressions. In: Giles D, Ullah A (eds) Handbook of applied economic statistics. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 507–522

    Google Scholar 

  • Westerhoff FH, Dieci R (2006) The effectiveness of Keynes–Tobin transaction taxes when heterogeneous agents can trade in different markets: a behavioral finance approach. J Econ Dyn Control 30(2):293–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu E, Erdem M, Kalotychou E, Remolona E (2016) The anatomy of sovereign risk contagion. J Int Money Finance 69:264–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiong W, Yan H (2010) Heterogeneous expectations and bond markets. Rev Financ Stud 23(4):1433–1466

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the anonymous reviewer for extraordinary valuable comments on earlier version of this article. We are grateful of the guidance received from editor Bertrand Candelon. We also thank Donald Lien for the valuable suggestions and Annalee McWilliams for excellent research assistance. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration (Grant Agreement No. 612955), the Youth Foundation of the Humanities and Social Sciences Research of the Ministry of Education of China (Grant No. 17YJC790016) and the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China (Grant No. 2017A030310314).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhenxi Chen.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, Z., Reitz, S. Dynamics of the European sovereign bonds and the identification of crisis periods. Empir Econ 58, 2761–2781 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-019-01653-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-019-01653-0

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation