Skip to main content
Log in

Are there asymmetric relations between real interest rates and agricultural commodity prices? Testing for threshold effects of US real interest rates and adjusted wheat, corn, and soybean prices

  • Published:
Empirical Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article analyzes whether there are asymmetric relations between real interest rates and agricultural commodity prices using quarterly data of US interest rates and agricultural commodity prices over the period of 1983q1–2014q4. While the literature has identified statistically significant negative relations between real interest rates and agricultural commodity prices, this article extends the analysis by testing for threshold effects using Hansen’s (J Econom 93(2):345–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(99)00025-1, 1999) fixed-effect panel threshold model and testing procedure. The empirical results indicate that real interest rates and agricultural commodity prices follow a U-shaped relationship, with − 1.45 being the turning point from negative to positive effects. Specifically, if real interest rates below the threshold of − 1.45 are increased by 1%, agricultural commodity prices will decrease by 8.1%, and if real interest rates are equal or above − 1.45 and are increased by 1%, agricultural commodity prices will increase by 3.4%. As the literature suggests an inverse proportional relation between real interest rates and agricultural commodity prices, a theoretical explanation for this phenomenon has yet to be found but is probably related to assumptions about market participants’ expectations and risk behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Source: Author’s estimations

Fig. 2

Source: Author’s estimations

Fig. 3

Source: Author’s estimations

Fig. 4

Source: Author’s estimations

Fig. 5

Source: Author’s estimations

Fig. 6

Source: Author’s estimations

Fig. 7

Source: Author’s estimations

Fig. 8

Source: Author’s estimations

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Data is available at Thomson Reuters (accessed 30.04.2015).

  2. Data is available at https://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/ (accessed 15.05.2015).

  3. Data is available at https://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/ (accessed 15.05.2015).

  4. Data is available at http://quickstats.nass.usda.gov/ (accessed 07.02.2015).

  5. Data is available at Thomson Reuters (accessed 30.04.2015).

  6. Data is available at https://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/ (accessed 15.05.2015).

  7. Data is available at Thomson Reuters (accessed 30.04.2015).

  8. Data is available at https://www.federalreserve.gov/ (accessed 13.04.2015).

  9. Production data/1.000.000.000; inventory/1.000.000.000; futures open contracts/100.000; real GDP/1.000; oil Price/100.

  10. Data is available at https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/teleconnections/enso/indicators/soi/ (accessed 21.02.2017).

  11. The results are available upon request.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank Thomas Bittmann for gathering the data for this article. I am very grateful to Jeffrey Frankel, James Vercammen, David Roodman, and Jens-Peter Loy for useful comments. I also would like to thank the anonymous referee for useful comments and suggestions on the development of this paper. Last but not least, I thank Edward Yiu for giving me the inspiration for writing this article. The usual disclaimer applies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bente Castro Campos.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Bente Castro Campos declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Human and animal rights

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by the author.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Castro Campos, B. Are there asymmetric relations between real interest rates and agricultural commodity prices? Testing for threshold effects of US real interest rates and adjusted wheat, corn, and soybean prices. Empir Econ 59, 371–394 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-019-01636-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-019-01636-1

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation