Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Income inequality, financial flows and political institution: sub-Saharan African financial network

  • Published:
Empirical Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using firm-level loan contracts, we generate aggregate measures of financial connections and examine how these indices relate to income inequality in sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries. The results reveal that more connectedness is not beneficial for these economies as shown by the degree and the eigenvector indices. Betweenness centrality worsens income inequality such that the act of intermediation in the provision of financing remains detrimental to net and market income inequalities. Independent access to funding has no significant effect on income inequality. While accounting for the influence of political instability, the results reveal that financial connectedness is beneficial in reducing income inequality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Some of these studies include von Peter (2007) and Hale (2012).

  2. Some supporting and opposing views can be seen in Demirgüç-Kunt and Levine (2008) and Claessens and Perotti (2007). Crespo Cuaresma et al. (2017) re-examine the relationship between income inequality and aggregate consumption.

  3. The measures of financial development have been used in (Bhattacharya et al. 2018a).

  4. See Papageorgiou et al. (2008) on international financial market and welfare performance. Studies in international financial flows include. The link between finance and welfare is also present in the literature (see for example, Inekwe 2015).

  5. The relationship between FDI and income inequality is examined in Deng and Lin (2013).

  6. Roe and Siegel (2011) reveal the importance of political instability in financial development and income inequality.

  7. An explanation on how inequality index should be aggregated is provided in Gobbin et al. (2007). Hartog (1983) examines income distribution relative to income tax.

  8. For more description visit http://www.wider.unu.edu/research/WIID3-0B/en_GB/wiid/.

  9. These and more complex measures of network are described in Newman (2010).

  10. This is not the system GMM.

  11. The borrowers and lenders are identified by following Ivashina (2009) and Inekwe et al. (2018a).

  12. Hub centrality is scaled by 10,000, betweenness and eigenvector indices are scaled by 1000, and closeness centrality is scaled by 1,000,000,000.

  13. These are similar to the determinants of financial integration as listed in Bhattacharya et al. (2018b).

  14. The relationship between income inequality and democracy is explored in Islam (2016).

References

  • Alderson AS, Nielsen F (2002) Globalization and the great u-turn: income inequality trends in 16 oecd countries1. Am J Sociol 107:1244–1299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson E (2005) Openness and inequality in developing countries: a review of theory and recent evidence. World Dev 33:1045–1063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee AV, Duflo E (2005) Growth theory through the lens of development economics. Handb Econ Growth 1:473–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee AV, Newman AF (1993) Occupational choice and the process of development. J Polit Econ 101:274–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baum CF, Schaffer ME, Stillman S (2007) IVREG2: stata module for extended instrumental variables/2SLS, Gmm and AC/HAC, LIML, and k-class regression. Stata J 7:465–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck T, Demirgüç-Kunt A, Levine R (2007) Finance, inequality and the poor. J Econ Growth 12:27–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck T, Levine R, Levkov A (2010) Big bad banks? The winners and losers from bank deregulation in the united states. J Finance 65:1637–1667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckfield J (2006) European integration and income inequality. Am Soc Rev 71:964–985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya M, Inekwe J, Paramati SR (2018a) Remittances and financial development: Empirical evidence from heterogeneous panel of countries. Appl Econ 50:4099–4112

  • Bhattacharya M, Inekwe JN, Valenzuela MR (2018b) Financial integration in africa: new evidence using network approach. Econ Model 72:379–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowles S (2000) Globalization and redistribution: feasible egalitarianism in a competitive world. PERI working papers, p 20

  • Chong A, Calderón C (2000) Institutional quality and income distribution. Econ Dev Cult Change 48:761–786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen BV (2014) Financial integration in africa: Implications for monetary policy and financial stability. BIS paper

  • Claessens S, Perotti E (2007) Finance and inequality: channels and evidence. J Comp Econ 35:748–773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornia GA (2000) Inequality and poverty in the era of liberalisation and globalisation. Helsinki UNU WIDER Disponible en http://www.unu.edu/millennium/cornia.pdf

  • Cornia GA (ed) (2004) Inequality, growth, and poverty in an era of liberalization and globalization. Oxford University Press for UNU/WIDER (United Nations University/World Institute for Development Economic Research)

  • Crespo Cuaresma J, Kubala J, Petrikova K (2017) Does income inequality affect aggregate consumption? Revisiting the evidence. Empir Econ 55:905–915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deininger K, Squire L (1996) A new data set measuring income inequality. World Bank Econ Rev 10:565–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demirguc-Kunt A, Levine R (2009) Finance and inequality: theory and evidence. National Bureau of Economic Research

  • Demirgüç-Kunt A, Levine R (2008) Finance and opportunity. World bank policy research paper

  • Deng W-S, Lin Y-C (2013) Parameter heterogeneity in the foreign direct investment-income inequality relationship: a semiparametric regression analysis. Empir Econ 45:845–872

    Google Scholar 

  • Dollar D, Kraay A (2002a) Growth is good for the poor. J Econ Growth 7:195–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dollar D, Kraay A (2002b) Spreading the wealth. Foreign Aff NY 81:120–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Firebaugh G (2003) The new geography of global income inequality. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Galor O, Zeira J (1993) Income distribution and macroeconomics. Rev Econ Stud 60:35–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gobbin N, Rayp G, Van de gaer D (2007) Inequality and growth: from micro theory to macro empirics. Scot J Polit Econ 54:508–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goesling B, Baker DP (2008) Three faces of international inequality. Res Soc Stratif Mob 26:183–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood J, Jovanovic B (1990) Financial development, growth, and the distribution of income. J Polit Econ 98:1076–1107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hale G (2012) Bank relationships, business cycles, and financial crises. J Int Econ 88:312–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartog J (1983) Inequality reduction by income taxes: just how much? An investigation for the netherlands, 1914–1973. Empir Econ 8:9–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang HC, Lin YC, Yeh CC (2009) Joint determinations of inequality and growth. Econ Lett 103:163–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2009.03.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inekwe JN (2015) Financial distress, employees’ welfare and entrepreneurship among smes. Soc Indic Res 129:1135–1153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inekwe JN, Jin Y, Valenzuela MR (2018a) Global financial network and liquidity risk. Aust J Manag 43:593–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inekwe JN, Jin Y, Valenzuela MR (2018b) A new approach to financial integration and market income inequality. Emerg Mark Rev 2:1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2018.07.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Islam MN (2016) Does democracy reduce income inequality? Empir Econ 51:1299–1318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivashina V (2009) Asymmetric information effects on loan spreads. J Financ Econ 92:300–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinberg JM (1999) Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. J ACM (JACM) 46:604–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane PR (2016) International financial flows and macro-financial risk in ssa. J Afr Econ 25:580–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane PR, Milesi-Ferretti GM (2007) The external wealth of nations mark ii: revised and extended estimates of foreign assets and liabilities, 1970–2004. J Int Econ 73:223–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewbel A (2012) Using heteroscedasticity to identify and estimate mismeasured and endogenous regressor models. J Bus Econ Stat 30:67–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsuyama K (2004) Financial market globalization, symmetry-breaking, and endogenous inequality of nations. Econometrica 72:853–884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milanovic B (2011) Worlds apart: measuring international and global inequality. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mills M (2009) Globalization and inequality. Eur Sociol Rev 25:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miura H (2012) Stata graph library for network analysis. Stata J 12:94–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nafziger EW (1997) The economics of developing countries. Pearson College Division, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman M (2010) Networks: an introduction. Oxford University Press Inc., Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nissanke M, Thorbecke E (2006) Channels and policy debate in the globalization–inequality–poverty nexus. World Dev 34:1338–1360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olea JLM, Pflueger C (2013) A robust test for weak instruments. J Bus Econ Stat 31:358–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papageorgiou C, Lall MS, Jaumotte MF (2008) Rising income inequality: technology, or trade and financial globalization? vol 8–185. International Monetary Fund

  • Rodrik D (1997) Has globalization gone too far? Calif Manag Rev 39:29–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roe MJ, Siegel JI (2011) Political instability: effects on financial development, roots in the severity of economic inequality. J Comp Econ 39:279–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sala-I-Martin X (2006) The world distribution of income: falling poverty and… convergence, period. Quart J Econ 121:351–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M, Loganathan N, Tiwari AK, Sherafatian-Jahromi R (2015) Financial development and income inequality: is there any financial kuznets curve in iran? Soc Indic Res 124:357–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smeeding TM (2005) Public policy, economic inequality, and poverty: the united states in comparative perspective*. Soc Sci Q 86:955–983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solt F (2009) Standardizing the world income inequality database*. Soc Sci Quart 90:231–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spilimbergo A, Londoño JL, Székely M (1999) Income distribution, factor endowments, and trade openness. J Dev Econ 59:77–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strange S (1996) The retreat of the state: the diffusion of power in the world economy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • The standardized world income inequality database (2014) Harvard Dataverse.http://hdl.handle.net/1902.1/11992

  • Thorbecke E (2013) The interrelationship linking growth, inequality and poverty in sub-saharan africa. J Afr Econ 22:i15–i48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorbecke E, Charumilind C (2002) Economic inequality and its socioeconomic impact. World Devel 30:1477–1495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Peter G (2007) International banking centres: a network perspective. Int Bank Financ Mark Dev 3:33

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade RH (2004) Is globalization reducing poverty and inequality? World Dev 32:567–589

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Nkwoma Inekwe.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest in this paper.

Human and animal rights

This article does not contain any studies with animals nor human beings performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The views expressed in this article are those of the authors.

Appendix

Appendix

See Figs. 1, 2 and Tables 7, 8.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Financial integration of sub-Saharan African economies (2008–2009). This is produced using the Stata package developed by Miura (2012). This presents the visualization of the network. We graph the period of the global financial crisis (GFC: 2008–2009), and the network formation is extremely scanty. This corresponds with the findings of Hale (2012) who show that the GFC period is marked by a reduction in the integration of the global markets as evident in the reduction of loan syndication. Firms are used in this representation, and their names are abbreviated

Fig. 2
figure 2

Loan amount for sub-Saharan Africa

Table 7 Rank of countries by their various connectedness
Table 8 The correlation matrix of network indices

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Inekwe, J.N., Jin, Y. & Valenzuela, M.R. Income inequality, financial flows and political institution: sub-Saharan African financial network. Empir Econ 58, 2635–2665 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-019-01634-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-019-01634-3

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation