Skip to main content
Log in

Robustness and sensitivity analyses for stochastic volatility models under uncertain data structure

  • Published:
Empirical Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we perform robustness and sensitivity analysis of several continuous-time stochastic volatility (SV) models with respect to the process of market calibration. The analyses should validate the hypothesis on importance of the jump part in the underlying model dynamics. Also an impact of the long memory parameter is measured for the approximative fractional SV model (FSV). For the first time, the robustness of calibrated models is measured using bootstrapping methods on market data and Monte Carlo filtering techniques. In contrast to several other sensitivity analysis approaches for SV models, the newly proposed methodology does not require independence of calibrated parameters—an assumption that is typically not satisfied in practice. Empirical study is performed on a data set of Apple Inc. equity options traded in four different days in April and May 2015. In particular, the results for Heston, Bates and approximative FSV models are provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For more details on the arbitrage pricing see, for instance, Shreve (2004).

  2. Alternatively one can estimate the parameters from time-series data.

  3. The weight functions introduced by Mrázek et al. (2016) were considered.

  4. For instance, if \(N = 6\) one might obtain \(\mathbf{X}^{\dagger } = (X_2, X_1,X_4,X_4,X_3,X_2)\) where \(X_j=(K_j,T_j)\).

  5. For more details on Monte Carlo filtering approaches see, for instance Saltelli et al. (2008).

  6. In this case, we will not be able to decide whether the parameters lead to a good or bad description of the modelled market.

  7. For all trials we use “standard” \(\alpha = 5\%\) level of significance. In most of the trials we could have even lower \(\alpha \) and still we would reject the null hypothesis.

  8. See, e.g., www.mathworks.com/help/stats/kstest2.html.

  9. All results and data are available in supplementary materials.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the GACR Grant 14-11559S Analysis of Fractional Stochastic Volatility Models and their Grid Implementation. Computational resources were provided by the CESNET LM2015042 and the CERIT Scientific Cloud LM2015085, provided under the programme “Projects of Large Research, Development, and Innovations Infrastructures”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Pospíšil.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pospíšil, J., Sobotka, T. & Ziegler, P. Robustness and sensitivity analyses for stochastic volatility models under uncertain data structure. Empir Econ 57, 1935–1958 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-018-1535-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-018-1535-3

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

JEL Classification

Navigation