Skip to main content
Log in

Mutual funds’ selective participation and subsequent performance of seasoned equity offerings

  • Published:
Empirical Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We study the stock-picking ability of the mutual fund industry in China based on its selective participation in the SEO market. Mutual funds, as an industry, have selection ability if SEO firms with more subscriptions by mutual funds have better future performance than those with fewer subscriptions. To isolate the effect of mutual funds’ favorable opinions about the future performance of an SEO firm, we use a statistical model to exclude the impact of a set of extensive factors on the decision to subscribe to an SEO. We use the model residuals as the ex ante favorable expectations about SEO firms by the mutual fund industry. Our findings suggest that those SEO firms being favored by the mutual fund industry perform statistically and economically significantly better than those SEO firms not favored by the industry. Investors can draw valuable inferences from mutual funds’ aggregate decision to participate in the SEO offer market.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In addition to participating in SEO subscription, these mutual funds would purchase proportionately more shares of the successful SEOs. However, such data are not available. We sincerely thank an anonymous reviewer to raise this point.

  2. We acknowledge the reviewer for raising this point.

  3. We thank the reviewer for helping us clarify its definition.

  4. We also use the weighted number of mutual funds, where the weight is computed as the ratio of a fund’s SEO purchase over its total assets, the results are quantitatively the same.

  5. When we include other variables on SEO firms, such as board size, independent directors ratio, the separation of Chair and CEO, the variance of the firm’s return using the last 200 days, a firm’s turnover during the prior year, analyst coverage during the prior year, the main results in this study remain qualitatively the same.

  6. We greatly acknowledge an anonymous referee for his valuable suggestion.

  7. Using alternative thresholds, such as 5%, 10%, 20%, do not change our results.

  8. A fixed income mutual fund invests at least 80% of their assets in fixed income securities, whereas a balance mutual fund has flexibility to invest in any stocks and fixed income securities.

References

  • Baker M, Litov L, Wachter J, Wurgler J (2010) Can mutual fund managers pick stocks? Evidence from their trades prior to earnings announcements. J Financ Quant Anal 45:1111–1131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertin W, Prather L (2009) Management structure and the performance of funds of mutual funds. J Bus Res 62:1364–1369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carhart M (1997) On persistence in mutual fund performance. J Fin 52:57–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter R, Manaster S (1990) Initial public offerings and underwriter reputation. J Finance 45:1045–1067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter R, Dark F, Singh A (1998) Underwriter reputation, initial returns, and the long-run performance of IPO stocks. J Finance 53:285–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan C, Chen H, Chiang Y, Lai C (2017) Fund selection in target date funds. N Am J Econ Finance 39:197–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chemmanur T, Hu G, Huang J (2010) The role of institutional investors in initial public offerings. Rev Financ Stud 23:4496–4540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z, Ke B, Yang Z (2013) Minority shareholders’ control rights and the quality of corporate decisions in weak investor protection countries: a natural experiment in China. Acct Rev 88:1211–1238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen H, Lai C, Wu S (2016) Mutual fund selection and performance persistence in 401(k). N Am J Econ Finance 35:78–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chou D, Huang P, Lai C (2016) New mutual fund managers: why do they alter portfolios? J Bus Res 69:2167–2175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooney J Jr, Kato H, Schalheim J (2003) Underwriter certification and Japanese seasoned equity issues. Rev Finance Stud 16:949–982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corwin S (2003) The determinants of underpricing for seasoned equity offers. J Finance 58:2249–2279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das S, Guo R, Zhang H (2006) Analysts’ selective coverage and subsequent performance of newly public firms. J Finance 61:1159–1185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama E (1970) Efficient capital markets: a review of theory and empirical work. J Finance 25:383–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama E, French K (2010) Luck versus skill in the cross-section of mutual fund returns. J Finance 65:1915–1947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng X, Johansson A (2015) Can mutual funds pick stocks in China? Evidence from the IPO market. J Bank Finance 55:170–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Firth M, Chen L, Zou H (2010) Friend or foe? The role of state and mutual fund ownership in the split share structure reform in China. J Financ Quant Anal 45:685–706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson S, Safieddine A, Sonti R (2004) Smart investments by smart money: evidence from seasoned equity offerings. J Finance Econ 72:581–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grinblatt M, Titman S (1989) Mutual fund performance: an analysis of quarterly portfolio holdings. J Bus 62:394–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grinblatt M, Titman S (1993) Performance measurement without benchmark: an examination of mutual fund returns. J Bus 66:47–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grinblatt M, Titman S, Wermers R (1995) Momentum investment strategies, portfolio performance, and herding: a study of mutual fund behavior. Am Econ Rev 95:1088–1105

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber M (1996) Another puzzle: the growth in actively managed mutual funds. J Fin 51:783–810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong H, Lim T, Stein J (2000) Bad news travels slowly: size, analyst coverage, and the profitability of momentum strategies. J Finance 55:265–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim K, Shin H (2004) The puzzling increase in the underpricing of seasoned equity offerings. Financ Rev 39:343–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu C, Chung C (2013) SEO underpricing in China’s stock market: a stochastic frontier approach. Appl Finance Econ 23:393–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu C, Yao L, Hu N, Liu L (2011) The impact of IFRS on accounting quality in a regulated market: an empirical study of China. J Account Audit Finance 26:659–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loughran T, Ritter J (1995) The new issues puzzle. J Finance 50:23–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo W, Rao P, Yue H (2010) Information risk and underwriter switching in SEOs: evidence from China. J Bus Finance Account 37:905–928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Megginson W, Weiss K (1991) Venture capitalist certification in initial public offerings. J Finance 46:879–903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mola S, Loughran T (2004) Discounting and clustering in seasoned equity offering prices. J Financ Quan Analysis 39:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nain A, Yao T (2013) Mutual fund skills and the performance of corporate acquirers. J Finance Econ 110:437–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newey WK, West KD (1987) Hypothesis testing with efficient method of moments estimation. Int Econ Rev 28:777–786

    Google Scholar 

  • Poon W, Chan K, Firth M (2013) Does having a credit rating leave less money on the table when raising capital? A study of credit ratings and seasoned equity offerings in China. Pac-Basin Finance J 22:88–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soucik V, Allen D (1999) Long run underperformance of seasoned equity offerings: Fact or an illusion? In: Working paper. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.172633

  • Tang K, Wang W, Xu R (2012) Size and performance of Chinese mutual funds: the role of economy of scale and liquidity. Pac-Basin Finance J 20:228–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wermers R (2000) Mutual fund performance: an empirical decomposition into stock-picking talent, style, transaction costs, and expenses. J Finance 55:1655–1695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiang E, Tian G, Yang F, Liu Z (2014) Do mutual funds have information advantage? Evidence from seasoned equity offerings in China. Int Rev Financ Anal 31:70–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang J, Chi J, Young M (2014) Mutual funds’ investment strategies and their preferences: evidence from China. Chin Econ 47:5–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu F (2008) Analyst coverage and earnings management. J Finance Econ 88:245–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan R, Xiao JZ, Zou H (2008) Mutual funds’ ownership and firm performance: evidence from China. J Bank Finance 32:1552–1565

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Feng acknowledges the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 71672147). The usual caveats apply.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kam C. Chan.

Appendices

Appendix 1

See Table 7.

Table 7 Mutual fund industry in China

Appendix 2

See Table 8.

Table 8 Variable definitions

Appendix 3

See Table 9.

Table 9 Analysis of SEO long-run stock performance with a time trend

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Feng, X., Chan, K.C. Mutual funds’ selective participation and subsequent performance of seasoned equity offerings. Empir Econ 56, 1797–1822 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-018-1420-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-018-1420-0

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation