Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Erratum to: Empirical Economics (2004) 29:5–20 DOI 10.1007/s00181-003-0188-y
The first displayed (unnumbered) equation on page 11 in Abbring and van den Berg (2004) gives an expression for \(\hbox {Pr}(T_{m}> t, T_p > t_{p}|x)\) that is incorrect. Under the assumption (implicit in the paper) that the distribution of \(T_{p}|x\) is not defective,
with
If \(t_p \ge t\), this does not depend on the treatment effect \(\Delta (t|t_p, x)\) and gives the expression on page 11. If \(t_p < t\), however, the expression on page 11 is incorrect. This is an isolated and inconsequential error in the sense that the equation is not referred to elsewhere in the paper and does not affect the text. We are grateful to Sumedha Gupta for drawing our attention to this error (first online draft of this erratum dated 2011).
The affiliation of the authors have also been updated and provided in the erratum.
References
Abbring JH, van den Berg GJ (2004) Analyzing the effect of dynamically assigned treatments using duration models, binary treatment models, and panel data models. Empir Econ 29:5–20
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.1007/s00181-003-0188-y.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Abbring, J.H., van den Berg, G.J. Erratum to: Analyzing the effect of dynamically assigned treatments using duration models, binary treatment models, and panel data models. Empir Econ 54, 883–884 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-016-1226-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-016-1226-x