Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Export sophistication increases income in sub-Saharan Africa: evidence from 1981–2000

  • Published:
Empirical Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous studies on export diversification show that sub-Saharan African countries are at the lowest end in export diversification in the world. Recent literature also indicates the importance of export sophistication on economic development. This raises an important question whether export sophistication contributes to the income improvement in sub-Saharan African. The paper examines the causal effect of export sophistication on income in sub-Saharan Africa with panel data. By employing instrumental variables techniques and heteroskedasticity identification strategy that correct for endogeneity bias, the findings show that within-country variations in export sophistication lead to income growth. That is, a 1 % point increase in the export sophistication index is associated with an increase in GDP per capita of approximately 0.08 % points in the long run.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Mishra et al. (2011) also show that sophistication in service exports lead to economic growth.

  2. See Miguel et al. (2004), Barrios et al. (2010), Brückner and Ciccone (2011), Miguel and Satyanath (2011), Ciccone (2011), as well as Arezki and Brückner (2012).

  3. The figure is based on WDI (2010).

  4. Similar estimation strategy has already been used in the literature, e.g., Blanchard and Perotti (2002), Brückner and Lederman (2012), and Brückner (2013).

  5. For instance, Van Biesebroeck (2005) demonstrates that exporting increases firms’ productivity in SSA. Brückner and Lederman (2012) show that trade openness contributes to economic growth substantially in SSA. Lin and Sim (2013) also show that trade is pivotal for economic development in 48 least developed courtiers (LDCs) listed by United Nations, 33 of which locate in SSA.

  6. In 1965, SSA and Asian economies had similar export sophistication indexes.

  7. We will introduce the construction of these measures in more detail in robust check section.

  8. Due to data (historical) limitation, we are able to calculate export sophistication index for only 36 SSAs. In addition, in these 36 countries, the export data are highly incomplete for some countries, e.g., Benin, Liberia and Somalia.

  9. This instrument has been used in previous works introduced in footnote 2.

  10. NASA GPCP rainfall estimates are based on data from gauge stations, and microwave, infrared and sounder data from satellites. Specifically, the NASA GPCP combines special sensor microwave imager emission and scattering algorithms, a geostationary orbital environmental satellite precipitation index, and an outgoing long wave precipitation index, information from Tiros operational vertical sounders and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration polar orbiting satellites, and measurements from gauge stations to obtain monthly rainfall estimates on a \(2.5^{\circ } \times 2.5^{\circ }\) latitude–longitude grid (Source: Brückner and Ciccone 2011).

  11. The main results are also robust when GDP per capita at purchasing power parity (PPP) is used. Detailed results are available upon request.

  12. Similarly, the relevant agriculture value-added ratio over GDP is 31 % (mean) and minimum (maximum) of 2.2 % (69.33 %) in SSA.

  13. In addition to the negative response of income to export sophistication in SSA context, an interesting question to tackle would have been to know whether there is nonlinear effect, and thus, we include income square to the regression and use rainfall square as instrument, we find that the income square estimates is negative (\(-0.186\)), while income is positive (0.782) but both are only significant at 0.1 significance levels, which implies that the nonlinear effect is not very strong or we can say that if there is a nonlinear effect, there could be some optimal levels of sophistication.

  14. It seems clear that the savings rate is not as exogenous to politico-economic conditions as is rainfall. This is the main reason why our instrumental variables analysis relies on rainfall as an instrument for GDP growth. Also, as is well understood, tests of the exclusion restriction are not bulletproof evidence that indeed instruments are valid. This is because these are joint tests and they require at least one valid instrument.

  15. These controls actually enter insignificantly in the second stage.

  16. Ulimwengu and Badibanga (2012) as well as Cottet et al. (2012) discuss the heterogeneity of export transformation (sophistication) in African Countries.

  17. The reported estimates in Fig. 3 are based on the sample (36 countries during 1980–2000).

References

  • Arbache J, Go D, Page J (2008) Is Africa’s economy at a turning point? World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 4519

  • Acemoglu D, Johnson S, Robinson J, Yared P (2008) Income and democracy. Am Econ Rev 98:808–842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu D, Johnson S, Robinson J, Yared P (2009) Reevaluating the modernization hypothesis. J Monet Econ 56:1043–1058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu D, Johnson S (2005) Unbundling institutions. J Polit Econ 113:949–995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arezki R, Brückner M (2012) Rainfall, financial development, and remittances: evidence from sub-Saharan Africa. J Int Econ 87:377–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrios S, Bertinelli L, Strobl E (2010) Trends in rainfall and economic growth in Africa: a neglected cause of the African growth tragedy. Rev Econ Stat 92:350–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baum C, Lewbel A, Schaffer M, Oleksandr T (2012) Instrumental variables estimation using heteroskedasticity-based instruments. UK Stata Users Group Meetings. http://119.90.25.26/repec.org/usug2012/UK12_baum.pdf. Accessed 20 July 2013

  • Bebczuk R, Berrettoni D (2006) Explaining export diversification: An empirical analysis. http://econpapers.repec.org/paper/lapwpaper/065.htm. Accessed 20 July 2012

  • Blanchard O, Perotti R (2002) An empirical characterization of the dynamic effects of changes in government spending and taxes on output. Q J Econ 117:1329–1368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brückner M (2013) On the simultaneity problem in the aid and growth debate. J Appl Econom 28:126–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brückner M, Ciccone A (2011) Rain and the democratic window of opportunity. Econometrica 79:923–947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brückner M, Lederman D (2012) Trade causes growth in sub-Saharan Africa. The World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 6007

  • Chen S, Ravallion M (2010) The developing world is poorer than we thought, but no less successful in the fight against poverty. Q J Econ 125:1577–1625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciccone A (2011) Economic shocks and civil conflict: a comment. Am Econ J Appl Econ 3:215–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cottet C, Madariaga N, Jegou N (2012) Export diversification in the franc zone: its extent, sophistication and dynamics. Agence Française de Développement Web. http://119.90.25.26/www.afd.fr/webdav/site/afd/shared/PUBLICATIONS/RECHERCHE/Scientifiques/Macrodev/03-VA-Macrodev.pdf. Accessed 26 June 2012

  • Deaton A (2005) Measuring poverty in a growing world (or measuring growth in a poor world). Rev Econ Stat 87:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dollar D (2008) Lessons from China for Africa. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 4531

  • Emran M, Hou Z (2013) Access to markets and rural poverty: evidence from household consumption in China. Rev Econ Stat 95:682–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feenstra R, Li Z, Yu M (2014) Exports and credit constraints under incomplete information: theory and evidence from China. Rev Econ Stat 96:729–744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feenstra R, Kee H (2008) Export variety and country productivity: estimating the monopolistic competition model with endogenous productivity. J Int Econ 74:500–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feenstra R, Lipsey R, Deng H, Ma A, Mo H (2005) World trade flows: 1962–2000. National Bureau Economic Research Working Paper No.11040

  • Finger J, Kreinin M (1979) A measure of ‘export similarity’ and its possible uses. Econ J 89:905–912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta S, Pattillo C, Smita W (2009) Effect of remittances on poverty and financial development in sub-Saharan Africa. World Dev 37:104–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassan K, Sanchez B, Yu J (2011) Financial development and economic growth: new evidence from panel data. Q Rev Econ Finance 51:88–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hausmann R, Hwang J, Rodrik D (2007) What you export matters. J Econ Growth 12:1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hesse H (2008) Export diversification and economic growth. World Bank Commission on Growth and Development Working Paper No. 21

  • Joachim J, Poncet S (2012) Export sophistication and economic growth: evidence from China. J Dev Econ 97:281–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleibergen F, Paap R (2006) Generalized reduced rank tests using the singular value decomposition. J Econom 133:97–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein R, Francis V (2010) Estimating a class of triangular simultaneous equations models without exclusion restrictions. J Econom 154:154–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewbel A (2012) Using heteroscedasticity to identify and estimate mis-measured and endogenous regressor models. J Bus Econ Stat 30:67–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin F, Sim N (2013) Trade, income and Baltic Dry Index. Eur Econ Rev 59:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manova K (2013) Credit constraints, heterogeneous firms, and international trade. Rev Econ Stud 80:711–744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall M, Jaggers K (2009) Polity IV project: Dataset users’ manual. Center for Systemic Peace, Center for Global Policy, George Mason University. http://www.systemicpeace.org/polityproject.html. Accessed 21 July 2012

  • Martincus C, Gallo A (2009) Institutions and export specialization: just direct effects? Kyklos 62:129–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miguel E, Satyanath S, Sergenti E (2004) Economic shocks and civil conflict: an instrumental variables approach. J Polit Econ 112:725–753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miguel E, Satyanath S (2011) Re-examining economic shocks and civil conflict: a comment. Am Econ J Appl Econ 3:228–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra S, Lundstrom S, Anand R (2011) Service export sophistication and economic growth. The World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 5606

  • Nair-Reichert U, Weinhold D (2001) Causality tests for cross-country panels: a new look at FDI and economic growth in developing countries. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 63:153–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran M, Smith R (1995) Estimating long-run relationships from dynamic heterogeneous panels. J Econom 68:79–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rigobon R (2003) Identification through heteroskedasticity. Rev Econ Stat 85:777–792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schott P (2008) The relative sophistication of Chinese exports. Econ Policy 23:5–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Small D (2007) Sensitivity analysis for instrumental variables regression with overidentifying restrictions. J Am Stat Assoc 102:1049–1058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staiger D, Stock J (1997) Instrumental variables regression with weak instruments. Econometrica 65:557–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stock J, Wright J, Yogo M (2002) A survey of weak instruments and weak identification in generalized method of moments. J Bus Econ Stat 20:518–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stock J, Yogo M (2005) Testing for weak instruments in linear IV regression. In: Andrews D, Stock J (eds) Identification and inference for econometric models: essays in honor of Thomas Rothenberg, 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 80–108

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ulimwengu J, Badibanga T (2012) The sophistication and diversification of the African agricultural sector: A Product Space Approach. https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea12/124498.html. Accessed 21 July 2012

  • Van Biesebroeck J (2005) Exporting raises productivity in sub-Saharan African manufacturing firms. J Int Econ 67:373–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Zhi, Wei S (2010) What accounts for the rising sophistication of China’s exports. In: Feenstra R, Wei S (eds) Chinas growing role in world trade, 1st edn. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 63–104

    Google Scholar 

  • WDI (2009) World Development Indicators. http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators. Accessed 1 May 2012

  • WDI (2010) World Development Indicators. http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators. Accessed 1 May 2012

  • Weldemicael E (2012) Determinants of export sophistication. Dissertation. The University of Melbourne

  • Xu B (2010) The sophistication of exports: Is China special? China Econ Rev 21:482–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu B, Lu J (2009) Foreign direct investment, processing trade, and the sophistication of China’s exports. China Econ Rev 20:425–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao S (2009) Why are Chinese exports not so special? China World Econ 17:47–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Faqin Lin.

Additional information

We are grateful to the Coordinating Editor Professor Robert M. Kunst and two anonymous referees for valuable comments and suggestions. Faqin Lin acknowledges that the work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (71503281) and Major Project Program of the National Social Science Fund of China (Nos. 12&ZD097 and 14ZDB120). The work is also supported by program for innovation research in Central University of Finance and Economics, which is highly appreciated by Faqin Lin. Xiaosong Wang acknowledges the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71473254).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, F., Weldemicael, E.O. & Wang, X. Export sophistication increases income in sub-Saharan Africa: evidence from 1981–2000. Empir Econ 52, 1627–1649 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-016-1103-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-016-1103-7

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation