Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Does democracy dampen the effect of finance on economic growth?

  • Published:
Empirical Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although a large empirical literature seeks to explain the effect of financial development in promoting economic growth, there is surprisingly little evidence for the impact of political institutions on the growth–finance relationship. This paper finds that political institutions condition the effect of financial development on economic growth. Using a dynamic panel estimator and a sample of 78 developing and emerging economies for the years 1982–2011, the paper investigates the impact of democracy on the relationship between financial development and economic growth. The paper finds that democracy does not enhance the effect of financial development on economic growth. This finding is consistent with a view that democracy can be captured by political elites or other special interests in developing and emerging economies, where institutions are relatively weak.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. These potentially omitted fixed factors are cross-country differences in geography, colonial heritage, and other historical factors that jointly determine the interaction between financial development and democracy and growth.

  2. The data on debt to GDP ratio have extensive gaps for most of the countries in the sample: To maintain the dataset, the paper uses debt to GNI ratio. But the main focus of this paper is the impact of democracy on the growth effect of finance.

  3. As \(T > 15\) the bias becomes negligible and converges to 0.

  4. Studies on the finance–growth relationship use 5-year averaged data, and do not consider this additional source of bias.

  5. This number is computed: \(0.5(0.17) + (-0.18 \times 0.15 \times 0.50\)) for China; Rica.

  6. With 5-year averaged data, the estimates are very similar to columns 1 and 3. The estimates for liquid liabilities, Pol2, and the interaction term in column 2 are qualitatively similar, though they are statistically insignificant at conventional levels with averaged data. Column 4 estimates are different with averaged data, but this is not surprising, as Aghion et al. (2005) and Levine et al. (2000) find that private credit by deposit banks is the most robust predictor of growth.

  7. According to the private interest view of financial deepening, ‘politicians do not intervene into the financial system to further public welfare but to divert the flow of credit to politically connected firms’ (Beck 2013: 19).

  8. Acemoglu et al. (2008) use the Freedom House Political Rights Index as their main measure of democratic political institutions to investigate the modernization hypothesis. Cavallo and Cavallo (2010) use the Polity2 subindex of democracy to examine the impact of democracy on the growth effect of crises.

  9. Five-year averaged results are similar to fifth year data for the main estimates, and the results for the control variables are stronger with 5-year averaged data. But, again, we prefer our data to 5-year averages, because of the additional serial correlation it introduces in the regressions.

  10. Data on total population are from the World Bank, World Development Indicators.

  11. Data on remittances are from the IMF and include: current transfers by migrant workers and wages and salary earned by nonresident workers.

  12. Gross capital formation is from the World Bank, World Development Indicators.

  13. These results are available upon request.

References

  • Abdih Y, Chami R, Dagher J (2012) Remittances and institutions: are remittances a curse? World Dev 40(4):657–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu D, Johnson S, Robinson J, Yared P (2008) Income and democracy. Am Econ Rev 98(3):808–842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu D, Naidu S, Restrepo P, Robinson J (2013) Democracy does cause growth. NBER working paper series no. 20004

  • Acemoglu D, Robinson J (2008) Persistence of power, elites, and institutions. Am Econ Rev 98(1):267–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu D, Robinson J (2012) Why nations fail: the origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. Crown Business, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Aghion P, Howitt P, Mayer-Foulkes D (2005) The effect of financial development on convergence: theory and evidence. Q J Econ 120(1):173–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Aghion P, Bacchetta P, Ranciere R, Rogoff K (2009) Exchange rate volatility and productivity growth: the role of financial development. J Monet Econ 56(4):494–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alesina A, Rodrik D (1994) Distributive politics and economic growth. Q J Econ 109(2):465–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arcand J, Berkes E, Panizza U (2012) Too much finance? IMF working paper, WP/12/161

  • Arestis P, Demetriades P (1997) Financial development and economic growth: assessing the evidence. Econ J 107(442):783–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagehot W (1873) Lombard street: a description of the money market. McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought

  • Barro RJ (2012) Convergence and modernization revisited. NBER working paper series no. 18295

  • Beck T (2013) Finance, growth and fragility: the role of government. CEPR discussion paper series no. 9597

  • Beck T, Levine R (2004) Stock markets, banks, and growth: panel evidence. J Bank Financ 28(3):423–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker G, Stigler G (1974) Law enforcement, malfeasance, and compensation of enforcers. J Leg Stud 3(1):1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharyya S (2013) Political origins of financial structure. J Comp Econ 41(4):979–994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharyya S, Holder R (2014) Do natural resource revenue hinder financial development? The role of political institutions. World Dev 57:101–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blundell R, Bond S (1998) Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. J Econom 87(1):115–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catrinescu N, Leon-Ledesma M, Piracha M, Quillin B (2009) Remittances, institutions, and economic growth. World Dev 37(1):81–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavallo AF, Cavallo EA (2009) Are crises good for long-term growth? The role of political institutions. J Macroecon 32(3):838–857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cecchetti SG, Kharroubi E (2013) Why does financial sector growth crowd out real economic growth? Bank for International Settlements

  • Cecchetti SG, Kharroubi E (2012) Reassessing the impact of finance on growth. Bank for International Settlements

  • Chami R, Fullenkamp C, Jahjah S (2005) Are remittance flows a source of capital for development? IMF Staff Pap 52:55–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Ćihák M, Demirgüč-Kunt S, Feyen E, Levine R (2013) Financial development in 205 economies, 1960 to 2010. NBER working paper series no. 18946

  • Choong C (2012) Does domestic financial development enhance the linkages between foreign direct investment and economic growth? Empir Econ 42(3):819–834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Gregorio J, Guidotti PE (1995) Financial development and economic growth. World Dev 23(3):433–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demetriades P, Hussein KA (1996) Does financial development cause economic growth? Time-series evidence from 16 countries. J Dev Econ 51(2):387–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang Y (2010) Political institutions and financial development: an empirical study. World Dev 38(12):1667–1677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaunky VC (2013) Democracy and economic growth in sub-Saharan Africa: a panel data approach. Empir Econ 45(2):987–1008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khawaja AI, Mian A (2005) Do lenders favor politically connected firms? Rent provision in an emerging financial market. Q J Econ 120(4):1371–1411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King RG, Levine R (1993) Finance and growth: Schumpeter might be right. Q J Econ 108(3):717–738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine R (2005) Finance and growth: theory and evidence. In: Aghion P, Durlauf S, Durlauf N (eds) Handbook of economic growth. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp 865–934

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine R, Loayza N, Beck T (2000) Financial intermediation and growth: causality and causes. J Monet Econ 46(1):31–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine R, Renelt D (1992) A sensitivity analysis of cross-country growth regressions. Am Econ Rev 82(4):942–963

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas R (1988) On the mechanics of economic development. J Monet Econ 22(1):3–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mankiw GN (2010) Macroeconomics. Worth Publisher, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mankiw GN, Romer D, Weil DN (1992) A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. Q J Econ 107(2):407–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall MG, Jagger K, Gurr TR (2011) Polity IV project. University of Maryland

  • Nickell S (1981) Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects. Econometrica 49(6):1417–1426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson M (1982) The rise and decline of nations. Yale University Press, New Heaven

    Google Scholar 

  • Papaioannou E, Siourounis G (2008) Democratisation and growth. Econ J 118(532):1520–1551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson T, Tabellini G (1994) Is inequality harmful to growth? Am Econ Rev 84(3):600–621

    Google Scholar 

  • Rioja F, Valev N (2004a) Finance and the sources of growth at various stages of economic development. Econ Inq 42(1):127–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rioja F, Valev N (2004b) Does one size fit all?: A reexamination of the finance and growth relationship. J Dev Econ 74(2):429–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau PL, Wachte P (2002) Inflation thresholds and the financial-growth nexus. J Int Money Financ 21:777–793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau PL, Wachtel P (2011) What is happening to the impact of financial deepening on economic growth. Econ Inq 49(1):276–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter JA (1911) A theory of economic development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavares J, Wacziarg R (2001) How democracy affects growth. Eur Econ Rev 45(8):1341–1378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Windmeijer F (2005) A finite sample correction for the variance of linear efficient two-step GMM estimators. J Econom 126(1):25–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Wang L, Wang S (2012) Financial development and economic growth: recent evidence from China. J Comp Econ 20(3):393–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I thank Sophia Preston, Zachary Williams, an anonymous referee, and the editor, Robert Kunst, for helpful suggestions and comments. All errors are, of course, my own.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin Williams.

Appendix

Appendix

1.1 Sample

Algeria, Argentina, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Bolivia, Botswana, Brazil, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cameroon, Cape Verde, Central African Republic, Chad, China, Colombia, Congo Democratic Republic, Costa Rica, Cote d’Ivoire, Dominica Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador, Ethiopia, Fiji, Gabon, The Gambia, Georgia, Ghana, Guatemala, Guinea Bissau, Guyana, Haiti, Honduras, India, Indonesia, Iran, Jamaica, Jordan, Kenya, South Korea, Kuwait, Lesotho, Madagascar, Malawi, Malaysia, Mali, Mauritius, Mexico, Mongolia, Morocco, Mozambique, Nepal, Nigeria, Pakistan, Panama, Papa New Guinea, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Rwanda, Senegal, South Africa, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Surinam, Swaziland, Syria, Tanzania, Thailand, Togo, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Turkey, Uganda, Uruguay, Zambia, Zimbabwe.

1.2 Definition of variables

1.2.1 Financial development variables

  • Bank private credit to GDP (private credit): The financial resources provided to the private sector by domestic money bank as a share of GDP. Source: Ćihák et al. (2013).

  • Liquid liabilities to GDP (liquid liabilities): Broad money or M3. Source: Ćihák et al. (2013).

  • Private credit by deposit banks and other financial institutions to GDP (Pcdbfin). Source: Ćihák et al. (2013).

  • Bank deposit to GDP (Bankdeposit): The total value of demand, time and saving deposits at domestic deposit money banks as a share of GDP. Source: Ćihák et al. (2013).

1.2.2 Democracy variables

  • Polity2 Index (Pol2): A composite index of autocracy and democracy, where the autocracy scores are subtracted from the democracy scores. The index ranges from -10 (strongly autocratic) to 10 (strongly democratic). This index is transformed to range from 1 to 0, where 1 is most democratic. Source: Marshall et al. (2011).

  • Polity2 subindex (Dem2): Institutionalized democracy. The democracy scores range from 0 to 10 and is transformed to 1–0, where 1 is the most democratic. Source: Marshall et al. (2011).

  • Freedom House Political Rights Index (FH): Ranges from 1 to 7 and transformed to 1–0, where 1 is the highest freedom. Source: Freedom House.

1.2.3 Other variables

  • GDP per capita (Lagged[logGDPpc]): GDP per capita in constant 2000USD lagged one period. Source: World Bank, WDI.

  • General government final expenditure to GDP (Govconsumption). Source: World Bank, WDI.

  • Consumer price index (Log[1+inflation]). Source: World Bank, WDI.

  • Imports and exports to GDP (Trade openness). Source: World Bank, WDI.

  • Foreign direct investment to GDP (FDI, net inflows). Source: World Bank, WDI

  • Remittance inflows to GDP (Remittance). Transfers by migrant workers and wages and salaries earned by nonresident workers. Source: IMF.

  • Total population (Log[population]). Source: World Bank, WDI.

  • Total debt service to GNI (Debt). Source: World Bank, WDI.

  • Gross capital formation to GDP (Investment). Source: World Bank, WDI.

1.3 Summary statistics

See Table A1.

Table 7 This table contains summary statistics

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Williams, K. Does democracy dampen the effect of finance on economic growth?. Empir Econ 52, 635–658 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-016-1089-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-016-1089-1

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation