Skip to main content
Log in

Nonlinear attractors and asymmetries between non-life insurance premiums and financial markets

  • Published:
Empirical Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Understanding how macroeconomic factors influence the underwriting cycle is a critical component of modelling cyclical movements in insurance dynamics. The purpose of this paper was to examine this issue to determine whether macroeconomic factors and non-life insurance premiums share a long-run attractor to which the system tends to return over time. We find strong evidence of linear cointegration in Canada, France, Japan, the UK, and the USA, with nonlinear attractors characterized by asymmetry in Canada, France, and the USA. The results suggest macroeconomic factors have important effects on insurance dynamics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See SwissRe publication by Karl et al. (2012) and a summary at http://www.swissre.com/library/?searchByType=1086541&search=yes&searchByLanguage=851547&searchByCategory=1023505.

  2. See Diers et al. (2012), p. 322.

  3. We thank Fredj Jawadi for providing the exact data series used in their analysis and for helpful discussions.

  4. \(\hbox {MARS}^{\mathrm{TM}}\) is a registered trademark of Salford Systems; www.Salford-Systems.com.

  5. The inferences for Japan do not change when using the sample period examined by Jawadi et al. (2009). The Johansen test results found in Table 2 indicate that r \(=\) 2 for Japan while r \(=\) 1 for all other nations. The approach used to test for nonlinear cointegration in this paper does not allow for more than one cointegrating vector, which may be the cause of the conflicting result for Japan and is left as an area for future study.

References

  • Boubaker H, Sghaier J (2012) How do the interest rate and the inflation rate affect the non-life insurance premiums? Bull Fr D’Actuartiat 12(24):87–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Diers D, Eling M, Kraus C, Reuss A (2012) Market-consistent embedded value in non-life insurance: how to measure it and why. J Risk Finance 13(4):320–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman JH (1991) Multivariate adaptive regression splines. Ann Stat 19(1):1–67

  • Gonzalo J, Pitarakis JY (2002) Estimation and model selection based inference in single and multiple threshold models. J Econom 110(2):319–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gron A (1994) Evidence of capacity constraints in insurance markets. J Law Econ 37:349–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington S, Niehaus G (2000) Volatility and underwriting cycle. The Handbook of Insurance Economics. Kluwer Academic, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins M, Thistle P (2000) Capacity constraints and the dynamics of underwriting profits. Econ Inq 38(3):442–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobijn B, Franses PH, Ooms M (2004) Generalizations of the KPSS-test for stationarity. Stat Neerl 58(4):483–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jawadi F, Bruneau C, Sghaier N (2009) Nonlinear cointegration relationships between non-life insurance premiums and financial markets. J Risk Insur 76(3):753–783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang S, Nieh C (2012) Dynamics of underwriting profits: evidence from the U.S. insurance market. Int Rev Econ Finance 21:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karl K, Holzheu T, Wong C (2012) Global Insurance Review 2012 and Outlook 2013/14. Swiss Reinsurance Company Ltd., Economic Research & Consulting, Zuric, Switzerland. Retrieved February 2013, from http://www.swissre.com/library/?searchByType=1086541&search=yes&searchByLanguage=851547&searchByCategory=1023505

  • Lee C, Chiu Y (2012) The impact of real income on insurance premiums: evidence from panel data. Int Rev Econ Finance 21(1):246–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lobato IN, Velasco C (2007) Efficient Wald tests for fractional unit roots. Econometrica 75(2):575–589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maki D, Kitasaka S (2014) Residual-based tests for cointegration in three-regime TAR models. Empir Econ. doi:10.1007/s00181-014-0822-x

  • Milborrow S (2009) Earth: multivariate adaptive regression spline models. R Software Package. Retrieved February 2013 from http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/earth/index.html

  • Seo MH (2008) Unit root test in a threshold autoregression: asymptotic theory and residual-based block bootstrap. Econom Theor 24(6):1699–1716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sephton PS (1995) Response surface estimates of the KPSS stationarity test. Econ Lett 47(3):255–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sephton PS (2008) Critical values of the augmented fractional Dickey–Fuller test. Empir Econ 35(3):437–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sephton P, Mann J (2013a) Threshold cointegration: model selection and applications. J Econ Econom 56(2):54–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Sephton P, Mann J (2013b) Further evidence of an Environmental Kuznets Curve in Spain. Energy Econ 36:177–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Sephton.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sephton, P., Mann, J. Nonlinear attractors and asymmetries between non-life insurance premiums and financial markets. Empir Econ 49, 783–799 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-014-0894-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-014-0894-7

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation