Skip to main content
Log in

Monetary policy in Brazil: evidence of a reaction function with time-varying parameters and endogenous regressors

  • Published:
Empirical Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper estimates a forward-looking reaction function with time-varying parameters to examine changes in the Brazilian monetary policy under the inflation-targeting regime. As the monetary policy rule has endogenous regressors, the conventional Kalman filter cannot be applied. Thus, the two-step procedure proposed by Kim and Nelson (J Monet Econ 53:1949–1966, 2006) is used for consistent estimation of the hyper-parameters of the model. The results indicate that the reaction function parameters of the Central Bank of Brazil are time-varying and that the regressors of that function are endogenous. Besides, we observed that: (i) the monetary policy interest rate (Selic rate) responses to current inflation and the inflationary expectations present considerable changes and have diminished with the passing of time; (ii) since mid-2010, policy rule has violated the Taylor principle; (iii) the implicit target for the Selic interest rate has shown a decline over time; and (iv) the degree of interest rate smoothing has shown a relative stability. Finally, the policy instrument response to the output gap presents an increasing trend over the 2010–2011 period.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The aggregate behavioral equations (1) and (2) are explicitly derived from optimizing behavior of firms and households, in an economy with nominal rigidities of prices and currency (Clarida et al. 1999).

  2. The interest rate smoothing is justified for several reason, such as: (i) presence of uncertainties regarding the value of the data and coefficients of the macroeconomic model; (ii) great changes in the interest rate might destabilize financial markets and foreign exchange; (iii) constant variation in the short term interest rate, even if small, would cause great effect on aggregate demand and inflation. For a theoretical and empirical research on the interest rate smoothing of monetary policy, see Clarida et al. (1998), Sack (2000), Woodford (1999, 2003) and Sack and Wieland (2000).

  3. Palma and Portugal (2011) found evidence in favor of a discretionary monetary policy in Brazil during the 2000–2010 period.

  4. Examples of other works that suppose the parameters of the model follow a random walk are Cogley and Sargent (2001, 2005), Boivin (2006) and Kim and Nelson (2006).

  5. As suggested by an anonymous referee, we estimated (13) and (14) assuming that \(\delta _{1}\) and \(\delta _{2}\) follow a random walk. However, the results of the likelihood ratio (LR) tests showed that the null hypothesis of constants parameters into (13) and (14) cannot be rejected at a significance level of 10 %. These results are available from the authors upon request.

  6. Regarding the determinants of the inflation expectations in Brazil, see Bevilaqua et al. (2008) and Carvalho and Minella (2012).

  7. Although the sample begins in January 2000, the observations used to estimate the reaction function (in step two) begin in November 2001. This is due to the use of the first 12 observations as initial values in the regressions, estimated in the first step, and of the following ten observations to obtain the initial values of the regression coefficients in step two. This last procedure was suggested by Kim and Nelson (1999, 2006) to diminish the effect of arbitrary initial values of the \(\beta \) parameters on the value of the log-likelihood function.

  8. The IPCA is calculated by the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE) and is the price index used as reference for the inflation-targeting regime.

  9. In the construction of the inflation-targeting regime series, it was taken into account that the CBB pursued a set goal of 8.5 % in 2003 and 5.5 % in 2004, as well as a target of 5.1 % in 2005. For details about the set goals and the announced goal for 2005, see Open Letters of 2003 and 2004 sent by the CBB to the Minister of Finance and the notes of the meeting of the Monetary Policy Committee (Copom) of September 2004.

  10. We used a smoothing parameter of \({\uplambda } = 14,400\) in the HP filter. In addition, we followed Ravn and Uhlig (2002) and estimated the regressions using \({\uplambda } = 129600\). The results were similar to those described in this article. These results are available from the authors upon request.

  11. The exchange rate is the percentage variation of the nominal exchange rate real/dollar (period average).

  12. These dummies were inserted to capture the strong current inflation increase and inflationary expectations at the end of 2002, the economic crisis of 2008 and an outlier (2002:10) in the output gap series.

  13. Initially, we estimated (13)–(14) and (37)–(38) without the time dummies, but the residuals usually showed problems of serial autocorrelation and non-normality. As this violates the assumptions about the errors, we chose to include the dummies in the regressions. Furthermore, the results for the \(\upbeta _t\!\)’s showed no significant changes when using the forecast errors arising from the regressions (13)–(14) and (37)–(38) without the time dummies.

  14. See, for example, Perron (1989).

  15. Perron and Yabu (2009) introduce tests for structural breaks in the tendency function that do not need, a priori knowledge, if the noise component of the series is stationary or presents a root unit. These authors also show that, in the case in which the structural break is unknown, the functional Exp-W\(_\mathrm{FS}\) of the Wald test produces a test with nearly identical limit distributions for the case of a noisy component I(0) or I(1). Due to this, the test procedures, with nearly the same size, can be obtained for both cases.

  16. The log-likelihood value for the model with constant parameters and bias correction terms was \(-\)93.88.

  17. See Kim and Nelson (1999, 2006).

  18. Regarding the H statistic, see Commandeur and Koopman (2007).

  19. In this case, the specification with constant parameters and bias correction terms presented a log-likelihood equal to \(-68\).

  20. It is worth while pointing out that the confidence interval does not allow asserting that \(\beta _{1}\) was significantly lower than zero during this period.

References

  • Aragón EKdaSB, Portugal MS (2010) Nonlinearities in Central Bank of Brazil’s reaction function: the case of asymmetric preferences. Estud Econ 40(2):373–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bevilaqua AS, Mesquita M, Minella A (2008) Brazil: taming inflation expectation. In: Bank for International Settlements (ed) Transmission mechanisms for monetary policy in emerging market economies, BIS Papers, vol 35. pp. 139–158

  • Boivin J (2006) Has U.S. monetary policy changed? Evidence from drifting coefficients and real-time data. J Money Credit Bank 38(5):1149–1173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calvo G (1983) Staggered prices in a utility-maximizing framework. J Monet Econ 12(3):383–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrion-i-Silvestre JL, Kim D, Perron P (2009) GLS-based unit root tests with multiple structural breaks both under the null and the alternative hypotheses. Econ Theory 25:1754–1792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho FA, Minella A (2012) Survey forecasts in Brazil: a prismatic assessment of epidemiology, performance, and determinants. J Int Money Finance 31(6):1371–1391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarida R, Galí J, Gertler M (1998) Monetary policy rules in practice: some international evidence. Eur Econ Rev 42:1033–1067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarida R, Galí J, Gertler M (1999) The science of monetary policy: a new Keynesian perspective. J Econ Lit 37(4):1661–1707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarida R, Galí J, Gertler M (2000) Monetary policy rules and macroeconomic stability: evidence and some theory. Q J Econ 115(1):147–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cogley T, Sargent T (2001) Evolving Post World War II U.S. inflation dynamics. NBER Macroecon Ann 16:331–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cogley T, Sargent T (2005) Drifts and volatilities: monetary policies and outcomes in the post WWII U.S. Rev Econ Dyn 8(2):262–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commandeur JJF, Koopman SJ (2007) An introduction to state space time series analysis. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooley T, Precostt E (1976) Estimation in the presence of stochastic parameter variation. Econometrica 44(1):167–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davig T, Leeper EM (2007) Generalizing the Taylor Principle. Am Econ Rev 97:607–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Mello L, Moccero D (2009) Monetary policy and inflation expectations in Latin America: long-run effects and volatility spillovers. J Money Credit Bank 41:1671–1690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott G, Rothenberg TJ, Stock JH (1996) Efficient tests for an autoregressive unit root. Econometrica 64(4):813–836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman JJ (1976) The common structure of statistical models of truncation, sample selection, and limited dependent variables and simple estimator for such models. In: Berg SV (ed) Ann Econ Soc Meas, vol 5(4). NBER, New York, pp 475–492

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim CJ (2006) Time-varying-parameter models with endogenous regressors. Econ Lett 91:21–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim CJ, Nelson CR (1999) State-space models with regime switching classical and gibbs-sampling approaches with applications. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim CJ, Nelson CR (2006) Estimation of a forward-looking monetary policy rule: a time-varying parameter model using ex post data. J Monet Econ 53:1949–1966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwiatkowski D, Phillips PCB, Schmidt P, Shin Y (1992) Testing the null hypothesis of stationary against the alternative of a unit root. J Econ 54:159–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas RE (1976) Econometric policy evaluation: a critique. Carnegie-Rochester Conf Ser Public Policy 1(1):19–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minella A, Freitas PS, Goldfajn I, Muinhos MK (2003) Inflation targeting in Brazil: constructing credibility under exchange rate volatility. J Int Money Finance 22(7):1015–1040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minella A, Souza-Sobrinho NF (2013) Monetary policy in Brazil through the Lens of a Semi-Structural Model. Econ Model 30:405–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moura ML, Carvalho Ade (2010) What can Taylor rules say about monetary policy in Latin America? J Macroecon 32(1):392–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng S, Perron P (2001) Lag length selection and the construction of unit root tests with good size and power. Econometrica 69(6):1519–1554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palma AA, Portugal MS (2011) Preferences of the Central Bank of Brazil under the inflation targeting regime: commitment vs. discretion. Rev Bras Econ 65(4):347–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perron P (1989) The great crash, the oil price shock and the unit root hypothesis. Econometrica 57(6):1361–1401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perron P, Ng S (1996) Useful modifications to some unit root tests with dependent errors and their local asymptotic properties. Rev Econ Stud 63(3):435–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perron P, Yabu T (2009) Testing for shifts in the trend with an integrated or stationary noise component. J Bus Econ Stat 27:369–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravn M, Uhlig H (2002) On adjusting the Hodrick–Prescott filter for the frequency of observations. Rev Econ Stat 84:371–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sack B (2000) Does the fed act gradually? A VAR analysis. J Monet Econ 46:229–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sack B, Wieland V (2000) Interest-rate smoothing and optimal monetary policy: a review of recent empirical evidence. J Econ Bus 52(1–2):205–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saiger D, Stock JH (1997) Instrumental variables regression with weak instruments. Econometrica 65(3):557–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-Fung JR (2011) Estimating monetary policy reaction functions for emerging market economies: the case of Brazil. Econ Model 28(4):1730–1738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor JB (1993) Discretion versus policy rules in practice. Carnegie-Rochester Conf Ser Public Policy 39:195–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodford M (1999) Optimal monetary policy inertia. NBER Working Paper 7261

  • Woodford M (2001) The Taylor rule and optimal monetary policy. Am Econ Rev 91(2):232–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodford M (2003) Optimal interest-rate smoothing. Rev Econ Stud 70(4):861–886

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the editor, two anonymous referees, Marcelo S. Portugal and the participants of the \(40^{\circ }\) Brazilian Economics Meeting for their helpful comments and suggestions. Edilean Aragón acknowledges the support of the Graduate Program in Economics at the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul during your visit in 2012. Edilean Aragón acknowledges financial support (postdoctoral fellowship) from the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Level Personnel (CAPES). Gabriela Medeiros acknowledges the financial supports provided by the National the Brazilian Council of Science and Technology (CNPq).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edilean Kleber da Silva Bejarano Aragón.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

da Silva Bejarano Aragón, E.K., de Medeiros, G.B. Monetary policy in Brazil: evidence of a reaction function with time-varying parameters and endogenous regressors. Empir Econ 48, 557–575 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-013-0791-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-013-0791-5

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation